Examples of using Total aggregate emissions in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Total aggregate emissions including LULUCF decreased by 5.2 per cent from 17,459.6 to 16,547.1 Tg CO2 equivalent.
Figures 3 and 4 and table 4 show that for a number of Parties the total aggregate emissions have increased over the period 1990- 2002.
For Annex I non-EIT Parties, total aggregate emissions excluding LULUCF increased from 1990 to 2007 by 11.2 per cent and emissions including LULUCF increased by 12.8 per cent.
The reported aggregate GHG emissions of these gases expressed in CO2 equivalent represented only 1.7 per cent of the total aggregate emissions of Annex I Parties.
Total aggregate emissions for the eight Parties with economies in transition(EIT Parties) have decreased by almost 40 per cent, although seven of these Parties reported increasing CO2 emissions in 2001.
Figures 3 and 4 and tables 4 and5 show that for several Parties the total aggregate emissions(with and without LULUCF) have increased over the period 1990- 2003.
Categories include: total aggregate emissions, emissions from stationary and mobile sources, emissions by pollutant, emissions by subnational region, or emission by sectors.
The reported aggregate emissions of these gases expressed in CO2 equivalent(without LULUCF)represented only 1.7 per cent(1.9 per cent including LULUCF) of the total aggregate emissions of Annex I Parties.
Total aggregate emissions for the 14 Parties with economies in transition(EIT Parties) have decreased by almost 40 per cent, although seven of these Parties reported that CO2 emissions increased from 2001 to 2002.
The Parties listed in Annex I to the Convention shall cooperate to ensure that their total aggregate[annual average] net emissions of greenhouse gases for the first period from[20_ to 20_] is[]per cent lower than their total aggregate emissions of greenhouse gases for[19_] the period from 19_ to 19.
Total aggregate emissions for the 14 Parties with economies in transition(EIT Parties) have decreased by 39.6 per cent(45.2 per cent including LULUCF), but eight of these Parties reported increasing CO2 emissions in recent years 2001- 2003.
Second, the table showing the comparison of estimates reported in the previous and current years' reports was split between two sections of this document- the comparison of estimates of total aggregate emissions can be found in the section on recalculations(chapter II) andthe comparison of the changes in total aggregate emissions over the reported time series can be found in chapter III.
For the Annex I non-EIT Parties, total aggregate emissions excluding LULUCF increased from 13,005.8 Tg CO2 equivalent in 1990 to 14,295.8 Tg CO2 equivalent in 2006, an increase of 9.9 per cent; the increase in GHG emissions including LULUCF was 9.1 per cent.
For Annex I Parties with economies in transition(Annex I EIT Parties), total aggregate emissions excluding LULUCF decreased by 35.2 per cent, from 5,596.8 Tg CO2 equivalent in 1990 to 3,627.7 Tg CO2 equivalent in 2005 by 36.2 per cent for GHG emissions including LULUCF.
For the Annex I non-EIT Parties, total aggregate emissions excluding LULUCF increased from 13,112.4 Tg CO2 equivalent in 1990 to 14,553.6 Tg CO2 equivalent in 2005, representing an 11.0 per cent increase 10.0 per cent increase for GHG emissions including LULUCF.
For Annex I Parties with economies in transition(Annex I EIT Parties), total aggregate emissions excluding LULUCF decreased by 37.0 per cent, from 5,907.6 Tg CO2 equivalent in 1990 to 3,721.5 Tg CO2 equivalent in 2007; GHG emissions including LULUCF decreased by 42.2 per cent over the same period.
A comparison of the percentage changes in total aggregate emissions from 1990 to the latest available year reported in document FCCC/SBI/2012/31, using information from Annex I Parties' 2012 inventory submissions, and those reported in the present document, using information in those Parties' 2013 inventory submissions, is presented in table 4.
A comparison between the percentage changes in total aggregate emissions from 1990 to the latest available year reported in document FCCC/SBI/2011/9, based on Parties' 2011 submissions, and those reported in the present document, based on Parties' 2012 submissions.
Table 4 shows a comparison of the percentage changes in total aggregate emissions from 1990 to the latest available year reported in the document published in 2009, based on Parties' 2009 submissions, with those reported in the current document, based on Parties' 2010 submissions.
Table 4 shows a comparison between the percentage changes in total aggregate emissions from 1990 to the latest available year reported in document FCCC/SBI/2010/18, based on Parties' 2010 submissions, and those reported in the present document, based on Parties' 2011 submissions.
Although Parties report high uncertainty in the LUCF sector data,in the cross-regional aggregate there appears to be only a small difference(1.7 per cent) between the total aggregated emissions without LUCF(11.7 billion tonnes CO2 equivalent) and with LUCF 11.9 billion tonnes CO2 equivalent.
Total aggregate GHG emissions excluding LULUCF thousands of Tg CO2 eq.
Total aggregate GHG emissions excluding LULUCF thousands of Tg CO2 equivalent.
Total aggregate GHG emissions including LULUCF thousands of Tg CO2 eq.
Total aggregate GHG emissions without LULUCF in 1990 1,000 Tg CO2 equivalent.
Total aggregate GHG emissions of individual Annex I Parties, 1990 and 2001.
Changes in total aggregate GHG emissions excluding LULUCF from 1990 to the latest available year.
Changes in total aggregate GHG emissions excluding LULUCF from 1990 to the latest available year.
Figure 5 shows the trends in Annex I Parties' total aggregate GHG emissions by sector.
The changes in total aggregate GHG emissions from 1990 to 2005 varied considerably among countries.