Examples of using A fair value in English and their translations into Serbian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
A fair value measurement is for a particular asset or liability.
The initial positive ornegative difference of a fair value of a derivative is disclosed in the balance sheet as an asset or liability.
A fair value measurement requires an entity to determine all the.
In making their collective offer, Kevin told Ars that the pair"individually considered each game andassigned what we thought was a fair value.".
A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either.
People also translate
Unobservable inputs developed in the manner described above are considered market participant assumptions andmeet the objective of a fair value measurement.
A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction of selling the asset or transferring a liability occurs either.
For example, a share option with an exercise price of CU15,on a share with a fair value of CU20, has an intrinsic value of CU5.
A fair value measurement is the point within that range that is most representative of fair value in the circumstances.
However, any adjustment to the quoted price of the asset results in a fair value measurement categorised within a lower level of the fair value hierarchy.
A fair value measure would recognize these facts and protect the minority shareholders from being forced to accept an unfairly discounted price.
Even when there has been a significant decrease in the volume or level of activity for the asset or liability,the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same.
However, the use of an alternative pricing method results in a fair value measurement categorised within a lower level of the fair value hierarchy.
A fair value measurement should include a risk premium reflecting the amount that market participants would demand as compensation for the uncertainty inherent in the cash flows.
A fair value measurement using present value techniques is made under conditions of uncertainty because the cash flows used are estimates rather than known amounts.
The transaction is between related parties,although the price in a related party transaction may be used as an input into a fair value measurement if the entity has evidence that the transaction was entered into at market terms.
A fair value measurement of an asset or a liability using a present value technique captures all the following elements from the perspective of market.
However, a fair value measurement shall not incorporate a premium or discount that is inconsistent with the unit of account in the IFRS that requires or permits the fair value measurement(see paragraphs 13 and 14).
To increase consistency and compatibility in fair value measurements and related disclosures,IFRS 13 establishes a fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs to valuation techniques into 3 levels.
Related disclosures, this IFRS establishes a fair value hierarchy that categorises into three levels(see paragraphs 76-90) the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. .
They are independent of each other, that is, they are not related parties,although the price in a related-party transaction may be used as an input to a fair value measurement if the reporting entity has evidence that the transaction was entered into at market terms.
A fair value measurement assumes that a financial or non-financial liability or an entity's own equity instrument(eg equity interests issued as consideration in a business combination) is transferred to a market participant at the measurement date.
They are independent of each other, that is, they are not related parties,although the price in a related-party transaction may be used as an input to a fair value measurement if the reporting entity has evidence that the transaction was entered into at market terms.
In weighting a quoted price as an input to a fair value measurement, an entity places less weight(when compared with other indications of fair value that reflect the results of transactions) on quotes that do not reflect the result of transactions.
The Committee wishes to highlight that Paragraph 84 of MFRS 13 states that an adjustment to a Level 2 input that is significant to the entire measurement might result in a fair value measurement categorised within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy if the adjustment uses significant unobservable inputs.
A fair value measurement developed using a present value technique might be categorised within Level 2 or Level 3, depending on the inputs that are significant to the entire measurement and the level of the fair value hierarchy within which those inputs are categorised.
Adjustments to arrive at measurements based on fair value, such as costs to sell when measuring fair value less costs to sell,shall not be taken into account when determining the level of the fair value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement is categorised.
Even when there is no observable market to provide pricing information about the sale of an asset orthe transfer of a liability at the measurement date, a fair value measurement shall assume that a transaction takes place at that date, considered from the perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the liability.