Examples of using Dnfbps in English and their translations into Serbian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
Obligations and decisions for financial institutions and DNFBPs 8.
Sanctions should be applicable not only to financial institutions and DNFBPs, but also to their directors and senior management.
This document is the result of intensive work and collaboration among relevant state authorities andrepresentatives of private sector(financial and DNFBPs).
This should not exempt financial institutions and DNFBPs from the requirement to apply enhanced measures when they identify higher risk scenarios.
Countries should consider measures to facilitate accessto beneficial ownership and control information by financial institutions and DNFBPs undertaking the requirements set out in Recommendations 10 and 22.
When assessing risk,financial institutions and DNFBPs should consider all the relevant risk factors before determining what is the level of overall risk and the appropriate level of mitigation to be applied.
Lower risk- Where lower risks are identified,countries may allow financial institutions and DNFBPs to take simplified measures to manage and mitigate those risks.
Countries should keep the assessments up-to-date, and should have mechanisms to provide appropriate information on the results to allrelevant competent authorities and self-regulatory bodies(SRBs), financial institutions and DNFBPs.
Higher risk- Where higher risks are identified financial institutions and DNFBPs should be required to take enhanced measures to manage and mitigate the risks.
Assessing risk- Financial institutions and DNFBPs should be required to take appropriate steps to identify and assess their money laundering and terrorist financing risks(for customers, countries or geographic areas; and products, services, transactions or delivery channels).
Countries should adopt appropriate measures for monitoring, and ensuring compliance by,financial institutions and DNFBPs with the relevant laws or enforceable means governing the obligations under Recommendation 7.
Financial institutions and DNFBPs should always understand their money laundering and terrorist financing risks, but competent authorities or SRBs may determine that individual documented risk assessments are not required, if the specific risks inherent to the sector are clearly identified and understood.
This should include powers to use compulsory measures for the production of records held by financial institutions, DNFBPs and other natural or legal persons, for the search of persons and premises, for taking witness statements, and for the seizure and obtaining of evidence.
Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs* Designated non-financial businesses and professions should be subject to regulatory and supervisory measures as set out below.(a) Casinos should be subject to a comprehensive regulatory and supervisory regime that ensures that they have effectively implemented the necessary AML/CFT measures.
The general principle of a RBA is that, where there are higher risks,countries should require financial institutions and DNFBPs to take enhanced measures to manage and mitigate those risks; and that, correspondingly, where the risks are lower, simplified measures may be permitted.
They explained that the national risk assessment in the Republic of Serbia was conducted according to the World Bank methodology which assesses the risks in five sectors; the volume of proceeds from crime is assessed, as well as compliance of the AML/CFT legislation at national level with international standards, banking sector, non-banking financial sector(capital market, insurance, leasing, voluntary pension funds) anddesignated non-financial businesses and professions(DNFBPs).
Supervision and monitoring of risk- Supervisors(or SRBs for relevant DNFBPs sectors) should ensure that financial institutions and DNFBPs are effectively implementing the obligations set out below.
Lower risk- Countries may decide to allow simplified measures for some of the FATF Recommendations requiring financial institutions or DNFBPs to take certain actions, provided that a lower risk has been identified, and this is consistent with the country's assessment of its money laundering and terrorist financing risks, as referred to in paragraph 3.
Independent of any decision to specify certain lower risk categories in line with the previous paragraph,countries may also allow financial institutions and DNFBPs to apply simplified customer due diligence(CDD) measures, provided that the requirements set out in section B below("Obligations and decisions for financial institutions and DNFBPs"), and in paragraph 7 below.