Examples of using The rfcs in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Prevent the RFCS from being undermined by other programmes.
This revision is required by the legislative Decision that created the RFCS.
In this regard, the RFCS is a vital and unique instrument.
Thus, it will include the main consensus-based topics for research to be pursued by the RFCS.
This article enumerates the RFCs that define Lightweight Directory Access Protocol(LDAP).
This revision is required by Council Decision 2003/76/EC, 2003/77/EC, 2003/78/EC of 1 February 2003,which created the RFCS.
In the Commission's view the RFCS has so far worked well and so a major overhaul is not required.
This recent tendency has been observed at atime when the new Member States are still participating relatively little in the RFCS programme.
Results of the first calls for tender following the expiry of the ECSC:a considerable fall in the number of successful proposals in the RFCS programme.
Any new requirements for the domain must meet the RFCs 1034, 1035, 1122 and 1123 standards and any standards superseding them.
More than two years since the publication of the above mentioned EESC opinion,some changes to the RFCS research programme are under way.
Whilst synergies between FP 7 and the RFCS should be availed of where possible,the role of the RFCS as a complementary and independent programme needs to be preserved(see Part one- B).
After a period of transition of three years, the RFCS research programme has proved to be efficient and effective, having substantially integrated the network of experts of the former ECSC Research programmes.
As the broader orientated European Mining Technology Platform will provide strategies and instruments for cross sectoral mining research,the complementary character of the RFCS programme should be retained and the programme should aim at specific coal mining RTD.
On 10 July 2007, after consultation with the Coal and Steel Programme Committee(COSCO), the European Commission adopted a proposal for aCouncil Decision on a revision of the technical guidelines on the RFCS research programme for spending funds on coal and steel research.
In relation to the Research Fund for Coal and Steel(RFCS), the Council Decision, under preparation,which lays down the multi-annual technical guidelines for the research programme of the RFCS, will lead to the first revision of the technical guidelines.
Collaborative research within the European steel sector, both within the RFCS and the Framework Programme, has been encouraged and strengthened over the past ten years.
A number of these administrative and technical constraints are being addressed through EU legislation in place or to be adopted(e.g. technical pillar of the 4th railway package, deployment of ERTMS)and specifically on the RFCs through the setting up of a certain number of specific working groups.
As far as the coal aspect is concerned,the level of funding allocated by the RFCS budget over the three last years has been of the order of EUR 16.13 million in 2003, 15.27 million in 2004 and 16.13 million for 2005.
A second version of the Strategic Research Agenda will set priorities and make proposals with regard to the placing of themes and research fields in the various European programmes: RFCS, RDFP(Framework programme, FP), Eureka, national and regional programmes, etc. Thus, it will include the mainconsensus-based topics for research to be pursued by the RFCS.
By means of the recent proposal to revise the technical guidelines for the RFCS programme, the Commission is now increasingly trying to adapt the formal procedures and structures to the 7th Research Framework Programme(FP7) of the EU.
Although for administrative reasons the RFCS Research programme includes both coal and steel, each sector has its specific characteristics and needs that should be managed in order to enhance the realisation of technical and scientific objectives of improving their competitiveness.
(4) It is appropriate to consider simpler funding rules to ease the participation of small andmedium-sized enterprises(SME) in the RFCS Programme and to permit the use of'unit costs' to calculate eligible staff costs for SME owners and other natural persons not receiving a salary.
By means of the recent proposal to revise the technical guidelines for the RFCS programme, the Commission is seeking to adapt, wherever deemed beneficial, the formal procedures and structures to those in use in the 7th Research Framework Programme(FP7) of the EU.
(4) It is appropriate to support the overall participation of small andmedium-sized enterprises(SME) in the RFCS Programme by, inter alia, simplifying the rules and to permit the use of'unit costs' to calculate eligible staff costs for SME owners and other natural persons not receiving a salary.
(4) It is appropriate to support the overall participation of small andmedium-sized enterprises(SME) in the RFCS Programme by, inter alia, simplifying the rules and to permit the use of'unit costs' to calculate eligible staff costs for SME owners and other natural persons not receiving a salary.