Examples of using Third directive in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
The European Union Third Directive.
The third Directive on money laundering should be adopted by the European Parliament and the Council as soon as possible.
Article 1: Amendment of the Third Directive.
The proposal for a third directive on driving licences(recast) introduces gradual access to the most powerful motorcycles;
The Commission has adopted a proposal for a third Directive on money laundering31.
Most modifications that are proposed in this article mirror those proposed for the Third Directive.
On 19 January 2013 the European Union Third Directive on driving licences came into force.
Point 1 contains the same change as the one proposed for the Third Directive.
The proposed right of access to a lawyer is the third Directive in a series of proposals to guarantee minimum rights to a fair trial anywhere in the European Union.
If the company accounts are already available, and comply with legislation, there is no need to duplicate them,but this is not the implication of Article 9(ii)(b) of the Third Directive, where the need to provide a report can be waived if shareholders unanimously agree.
The right to have access to a lawyer is the third directive so far in a series of proposals aimed at guaranteeing minimum rights for a fair trial anywhere in the European Union.
The law was followed by a second Directive on the right to information in criminal proceedings,adopted in 2012(IP/12/575), and by a third Directive on the right to access to a lawyer and communication upon arrest, adopted in 2013(IP/13/921).
However, the third directive follows very closely on the heels of the second directive, which itself had greatly expanded the scope of anti-money laundering provisions, and the range of sectors affected.
Points 8 to 12 aim at making the current Member State options,in Articles 24 to 29 Third Directive, to allow for simplified mergers mandatory for Member States.
In 1979, a third Directive(79/7/EEC), relating to the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment in matters of social security(statutory schemes), was adopted on the basis of ex-Article 235 EC.
In point 6,it is proposed to align the mechanism of the creditor protection under the Third Directive with the mechanism that was introduced into the Second Directive by Directive 2006/68/EC.
The initiative focuses on the Third Directive(Council Directive 78/855/EEC3) concerning mergers of public limited liability companies and the Sixth Directive(Council Directive 82/891/EEC4) concerning the division of public limited liability companies that deal with the modalities of domestic mergers and divisions.
Only on the possibility of shareholders to waive the reporting requirements, the technique of the proposals under points 3 and 5(with a view to Article 9(1)(c))differs slightly from that used in the case of the Third Directive, given that in the Sixth Directive, these possibilities for waivers are centralised in Article 10.
The right of access to a lawyer(IP/11/689) is the third Directive in a series of proposals- all of which have now been adopted- to guarantee minimum rights to a fair trial anywhere in the European Union.
Third, Directive 76/207 draws a distinction between discrimination directly on grounds of sex and‘indirect' discrimination inasmuch as only provisions, criteria or practices liable to constitute indirect discrimination can, by virtue of the second indent of Article 2(2) of that directive, avoid being classified as discriminatory if they are‘objectively justified by a legitimate aim, and the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary'.
The law was followed by a second Directive on the right to information in criminal proceedings, adopted in 2012(IP/12/575),and then by a third Directive on the right to access to a lawyer and on the right to communicate, when deprived of liberty, with family members and with consular authorities, adopted in 2013(IP/13/921).
The referring court further considers that the Member States are required, under the First and Third Directives, to adopt all appropriate measures to ensure that civil liability for damage caused by the use of motor vehicles habitually stationed in their territory is covered by insurance, in order to protect insured parties and the victims of accidents, and to ensure that compensation is paid for all loss or damage covered by compulsory motor vehicle insurance.
The law was followed by a second Directive on the right to information in criminal proceedings, adopted in 2012(see IP/12/575),and then by a third Directive on the right to access to a lawyer and on the right to communicate, when deprived of liberty, with third persons and with consular authorities, adopted in 2013(IP/13/921).
Under point 1, the list of companies to which the Third Directive and- via a reference in its Article 1(1)- also the Sixth Directive apply is adapted in order to reflect a change in the national law of Finland.
Two of the Directives that have been proposed for amendment havealready been the subject of simplification proposals: the Third Directive on mergers and the Sixth Directive that regulates divisions5 in relation to a key issue, the involvement of independent experts when public limited companies are merged or divided.
By its first question, the referring court asks, in essence, whether Article 3(1)of the First Directive and Article 1(1) of the Third Directive must be interpreted as meaning that compulsory insurance against civil liability resulting from the use of a motor vehicle must cover compensation for non-material damage suffered by the next of kin of deceased victims of a road traffic accident.