Examples of using To restrict the scope in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
To restrict the scope of the state.
Therefore, the rapporteur proposes to restrict the scope of this regulation to only LCVs operating internationally(which is only ca 10 percent of all LCVs).
Concerning family members of students, twelve Member States20 have notmade use of the option of Article 7(4) to restrict the scope only to the spouse and dependent children.
In this way, Member States could choose to restrict the scope of the reduced VAT rate or not, according to their national budgetary and fiscal choices.
Priority was given here to protecting workers and product users, albeit industry did succeed insecuring rather powerful political allies to restrict the scope of the legislation.
This decision and a number of other stringent measures to restrict the scope of gambling led to the fact that the number of gambling was gradually reduced in the country.
Given the additional complexities involved in an interoperability arrangement between CCPs clearing OTC derivative contracts,it is appropriate at this stage to restrict the scope of interoperability arrangements to cash securities.
It considered, inter alia, that the expression‘admission to events' in Article 53 of the VAT Directive had been included in orderto restrict the scope of exceptions and, correspondingly, to extend that of the general rule.
Like any other measure of secondary legislation adopted for the purposes of the application of Articles 87 EC and 88 EC,they cannot be interpreted in such a way as to restrict the scope of the rules laid down by the Treaty or to contravene the objectives it pursues.
Member States may adopt legislative measures to restrict the scope of the obligations and rights provided for in Articles 6(1), 10, 11(1), 12 and 21 when such a restriction constitutes a necessary measures to safeguard.
It maintains the substance of Article 15 of the ePrivacy Directive and aligns it with specific wording of Article 23 of the GDPR,which provides grounds for Member States to restrict the scope of the rights and obligations in specific articles of the ePrivacy Directive.
However, it would not be feasible to restrict the scope of the proposal so as to only aim at removing obstacles created by cross-border elements or to ease the resolution of only those disputes displaying a cross-border element, however defined.
We therefore call on you to support the proposal we are making to restrict the scope of delegated acts by voting against the paragraph on which we requested a separate roll call vote.
This Article shallnot affect the possibility of Member States to restrict the scope of the obligations and rights provided for in certain provisions of Regulation(EU) 2016/679 in accordance with Article 23 of that Regulation for the purposes listed in the first paragraph of that Article.
Accordingly, the word‘significant' is to be understood as intended to restrict the scope of the treatment, under the first subparagraph of Article 4(5) of the Sixth.
Article 13 enablesMember States to adopt legislative measures to restrict the scope of a number of obligations and rights provided for in Directive 95/46 when such a restriction constitutes a necessary measure to safeguard, in particular, national security, defence, public security and the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences.
Article 13 provides thatMember States may adopt measures to restrict the scope of the obligations and rights provided, inter alia, in Article 6(1) when such a restriction is necessary to safeguard certain interests, such as national security, defence or public security.
Next, the Court finds that while that directive enables Member States to restrict the scope of the obligation to ensure the confidentiality of communications and related traffic data, it cannot justify the exception to that obligation, and in particular to the prohibition on storage of data laid down by that directive, becoming the rule.
In the second, it is provided that MemberStates may adopt legislative measures to restrict the scope of the obligations and rights provided for in Articles 6(1), 10, 11(1), 12 and 21 of that directive, when such a restriction constitutes a necessary measure to safeguard, in particular, national security, defence, public security and the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences.