What is the translation of " CLEAR AND PRECISE RULES " in Slovenian?

• jasna in natančna pravila
• jasnih in natančnih pravil

Examples of using Clear and precise rules in English and their translations into Slovenian

Action has been taken and clear and precise rules introduced in this field.
Tudi na tem področju so bili sprejeti ukrepi in uvedena jasna in natančna pravila.

Market interconnection, which has been under way for some time, is becoming increasingly widespread: following the implementation of Directive 2004/39/EC and the European Code of conduct for clearing and settlement("the Code"), interconnection is covered by clear and precise rules, facilitating its broad introduction.
Medsebojna povezanost trgov, ki obstaja že nekaj časa, je vedno bolj razširjena: z Direktivo 2004/39/ES in Evropskim kodeksom ravnanja za kliring in poravnavo(v nadaljevanju: kodeks ravnanja) jo urejajo jasna in natančna pravila, ki olajšujejo njeno širjenje.

Directive 2006/24 does not lay down clear and precise rules governing the extent of the interference with the fundamental rights enshrined in Articles7and 8 of the Charter.
Da Odločba 2000/520 ne določa jasnih in natančnih pravil, ki bi urejala obseg poseganja v temeljne pravice, določene s členoma 7 in 8 Listine.

The good functioning of an internal market and the Community's commercial policy both on the internal and on the international level require that equal access to justice on the basis of clear and precise rules on international jurisdiction is ensured not only for defendants but also for claimants domiciled in the Community.
Dobro delovanje notranjega trga in trgovinska politika Skupnosti tako na ravni EU kot tudi mednarodni ravni zahtevata, da je enak dostop do sodnega varstva na podlagi jasnih in natančnih pravil o mednarodni pristojnosti zagotovljen ne samo tožencem, temveč tudi tožnikom s stalnim prebivališčem v Skupnosti.

A common supranational approach that establishes clear and precise rules on national jurisdiction will strengthen the public's legal protection and ensure that binding Community legislation is implemented harmoniously.
Enotni nadnacionalni pristop, ki določa jasna in natančna pravila o mednarodni pristojnosti, bo okrepil javno pravno varstvo in zagotovil usklajeno izvajanje zavezujoče zakonodaje Skupnosti.

Further, since the legislative measures referred to in Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58 must, in accordance with recital 11 of that directive,‘be subject to adequate safeguards', a data retention measure must, as follows from the case-law cited in paragraph 109 of this judgment, lay down clear and precise rules indicating in what circumstances and under which conditions the providers of electronic communications services must grant the competent national authorities access to the data.
Ker morajo biti poleg tega zakonski ukrepi iz člena 15(1) Direktive 2002/58 v skladu z uvodno izjavo 11 te direktive„predmet primernih zaščitnih ukrepov“, mora tak ukrep, kot izhaja iz sodne prakse, navedene v točki 109 te sodbe, določiti jasna in natančna pravila, ki določajo, v katerih okoliščinah in pod kakšnimi pogoji morajo ponudniki elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev pristojnim nacionalnim organom omogočiti dostop do podatkov.

According to the ECJ judgement each countries' national legislation must, first lay down clear and precise rules governing the scope and application of such data retention measure and imposing minimum safeguards so that the persons whose data has been retained have sufficient guarantees of the effective protection of their personal data against the risk of misuse.
Ta nacionalna ureditev mora za to, da ustreza zahtevam, navedenim v prejšnji točki te sodbe, prvič, določiti jasna in natančna pravila, ki urejajo obseg in uporabo takega ukrepa hrambe podatkov in ki določajo minimalne zahteve, tako da imajo osebe, katerih podatki so bili hranjeni, zadostno jamstvo, ki jim omogoča učinkovito varstvo njihovih osebnih podatkov pred tveganji zlorabe.

It follows from the foregoing that Decision 2000/520 does not lay down clear and precise rules governing the extent of the interference with the fundamental rights enshrined in Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter.
Iz navedenega izhaja, da Odločba 2000/520 ne določa jasnih in natančnih pravil, ki bi urejala obseg poseganja v temeljne pravice, določene s členoma 7 in 8 Listine.

The ECJ said that EU legislation must lay down clear and precise rules governing the scope and application of the measure in question and imposing minimum safeguards so that persons whose data have been retained have sufficient guarantees to effectively protect their personal data against the risk of abuse and against unlawful access and use of that data.
Zadevni predpisi Unije morajo tako določati jasna in natančna pravila, ki urejajo obseg in uporabo zadevnega ukrepa ter določajo minimalne zahteve, tako da imajo osebe, katerih podatki so bili hranjeni, zadostna jamstva, ki omogočajo učinkovito varovanje njihovih osebnih podatkov pred tveganji zlorabe in vsakršnim nezakonitim dostopom do teh podatkov ter njihovo nezakonito uporabo.

In order to satisfy the requirements set out in the preceding paragraph of the present judgment, that national legislation must, first, lay down clear and precise rules governing the scope and application of such a data retention measure and imposing minimum safeguards, so that the persons whose data has been retained have sufficient guarantees of the effective protection of their personal data against the risk of misuse.
Ta nacionalna ureditev mora za to, da ustreza zahtevam, navedenim v prejšnji točki te sodbe, prvič, določiti jasna in natančna pravila, ki urejajo obseg in uporabo takega ukrepa hrambe podatkov in ki določajo minimalne zahteve, tako da imajo osebe, katerih podatki so bili hranjeni, zadostno jamstvo, ki jim omogoča učinkovito varstvo njihovih osebnih podatkov pred tveganji zlorabe.

The Court of Justice then examines whether the EU regulation lays down clear and precise rules governing the scope and application of the measure in question and imposing minimum safeguards so that the persons whose data have been retained have sufficient guarantees to effectively protect their personal data against the risk of abuse and against any unlawful access and use of that data.
Zadevni predpisi Unije morajo tako določati jasna in natančna pravila, ki urejajo obseg in uporabo zadevnega ukrepa ter določajo minimalne zahteve, tako da imajo osebe, katerih podatki so bili hranjeni, zadostna jamstva, ki omogočajo učinkovito varovanje njihovih osebnih podatkov pred tveganji zlorabe in vsakršnim nezakonitim dostopom do teh podatkov ter njihovo nezakonito uporabo.

Urges military commanders to formulate sufficiently clear and precise rules of engagement so that soldiers can easily abide by the rules of international humanitarian law;
Poziva vojaške poveljnike, naj podajo ustrezno jasna in natančna pravila delovanja, da bodo lahko vojaki zlahka ravnali v skladu s pravili mednarodnega humanitarnega prava;

It concludes that in this case, Directive 2006/24 fails to lay down clear and precise rules governing the extent of the interference with the fundamental rights enshrined in Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter.
Iz navedenega izhaja, da Odločba 2000/520 ne določa jasnih in natančnih pravil, ki bi urejala obseg poseganja v temeljne pravice, določene s členoma 7 in 8 Listine.

It follows from the above that Directive 2006/24 does not lay down clear and precise rules governing the extent of the interference with the fundamental rights enshrined in Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter.
Iz navedenega izhaja, da Direktiva 2006/24 ne določa jasnih in natančnih pravil, ki bi urejala obseg poseganja v temeljne pravice, potrjene s členoma 7 in 8 Listine.

Accordingly, Section 1 of DRIPA is not compatible with the Charter as it does not lay down clear and precise rules providing for access to and use of retained data and because access to that data is not made dependent on prior review by a court or an independent administrative body.
Razdelek 1 DRIPA naj torej ne bi bil združljiv s členoma 7 in 8 Listine, ker naj ne bi določal jasnih in natančnih pravil v zvezi z dostopom in uporabo hranjenih podatkov in ker naj za dostop do teh podatkov ne bi določal predhodnega nadzora s strani sodišča ali neodvisnega upravnega organa.

In order to satisfy that requirement, the legislation in question which entails the interference must lay down clear and precise rules governing the scope and application of the measure in question and imposing minimum safeguards, so that the persons whose data has been transferred have sufficient guarantees to protect effectively their personal data against the risk of abuse.
Ta nacionalna ureditev mora za to, da ustreza zahtevam, navedenim v prejšnji točki te sodbe, prvič, določiti jasna in natančna pravila, ki urejajo obseg in uporabo takega ukrepa hrambe podatkov in ki določajo minimalne zahteve, tako da imajo osebe, katerih podatki so bili hranjeni, zadostno jamstvo, ki jim omogoča učinkovito varstvo njihovih osebnih podatkov pred tveganji zlorabe.

EU legislation involving interference with the fundamental rights guaranteed by Articles 7 and 8 of the CFR must, according to the court's settled case-law, lay down clear and precise rules governing the scope and application of a measure and imposing minimum safeguards, so that the persons whose personal data is concerned have sufficient guarantees enabling their data to be effectively protected against the risk of abuse and against any unlawful access and use of that data.
Predpis Unije, ki pomeni poseg v temeljne pravice, zagotovljene v členih 7 in 8 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, mora določati jasna in natančna pravila, ki urejajo obseg in uporabo ukrepa ter določajo minimalne zahteve, tako da imajo osebe, za osebne podatke katerih gre, zadostna jamstva, ki omogočajo učinkovito varovanje njihovih podatkov pred tveganjem nezakonitega dostopa do teh podatkov in njihove nezakonite uporabe.

I consider that the assessment of whether the national court faced a clear and precise rule of law is unconnected with the Court's choice of recourse to a simplified procedure in order to interpret such a rule..
Menim namreč, da presoja vprašanja, ali je nacionalno sodišče imelo na voljo jasno in natančno pravno pravilo, nima nobene povezave z odločitvijo Sodišča, da za razlago tega pravila uporabi poenostavljeno postopkovno obravnavo.

The general principle of legal certainty, which is a fundamental principle of European Union law, requires, in particular, that rules should be clear and precise, so that individuals may ascertain unequivocally what their rights and obligations are and may take steps accordingly.
V skladu s splošnim načelom pravne varnosti, ki predstavlja temeljno načelo prava Unije, morajo biti predpisi jasni in natančni, da se lahko posamezniki nedvoumno seznanijo s svojimi pravicami in obveznostmi ter ukrepajo v skladu z njimi.

If it were otherwise, there would be a risk of undermining the principle of legal certainty on which the rules on limitations periods specifically rely and which require that legal rules be clear and precise in order that interested parties can ascertain their position in situations and legal relationships governed by Community law(see, inter alia, Case C-63/93 Duff and Others[1996] ECR I-569, paragraph 20).
Sicer bi namreč to lahko �kodilo načelu pravne varnosti, na katerega se opirajo pravila zastaranja in s katerim se zahteva, da so pravna pravila prava Skupnosti jasna in določena ter da zagotavljajo predvidljivost dejanskih stanj in pravnih razmerij, ki izhajajo iz pravnega reda Skupnosti(glej zlasti sodbo z dne 15. februarja 1996 v zadevi Duff in drugi, C-63/93, Recueil, str. I-569, točka 20).

This rule introduces a clear and precise obligation on the taxable person making the intra-Community supply so that he may know without ambiguity what his rights and obligations are so that he can take measures accordingly.
To pravilo pomeni jasno in natančno obveznost za davčnega zavezanca, ki dobavlja znotraj Skupnosti, tako da je jasno seznanjen s pravicami in obveznostmi ter lahko ustrezno ukrepa.

First, as to whether the rule infringed is sufficiently clear and precise, it cannot be denied that a breach of EU law will clearly be sufficiently serious if it has persisted despite the delivery of a judgment declaring the infringement in question established, or a preliminary ruling or settled case-law of the Court on the matter from which it is clear that the conduct in question constituted an infringement.
Prvič, glede vprašanja, ali je kršeno pravilo dovolj jasno in natančno, ni mogoče zanikati, da je kršitev prava Unije očitno resna, kadar ni bila odpravljena, čeprav je bila razglašena sodba, v kateri je bila ugotovljena očitana neizpolnitev obveznosti, sodba o vprašanju za predhodno odločanje ali ustaljena sodna praksa Sodišča na zadevnem področju, iz katerih izhaja, da je obravnavano ravnanje kršitev.

Parents need to set clear, precise rules and be consistent in applying them.
Starš mora določiti jasna pravila, meje in biti dosleden pri njihovem izvrševanju.

This is an area where we need to draw up precise rules defining a clear framework.
To je področje, kjer moramo določiti natančna pravila, ki opredeljujejo jasen okvir.

The Commission adopted a two-tier approach to tackle these problems: infringement procedures to address incorrect implementation of the rules, and changes to the rules when they were not clear or precise enough.
Komisija je sprejela dvotirni pristop k reševanju teh problemov: s postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev je obravnavala nepravilno izvajanje pravil, pravila pa je spreminjala, kadar niso bila dovolj jasna ali natančna.

Rather there should be a reinforcement, with precise and clear rules being set by the European Union which should apply throughout China, and not just in some of the provinces, as the Member has just mentioned.
Namesto tega jih je treba okrepiti z natančnimi in jasnimi predpisi, ki jih določi Evropska unija in ki jih je treba uporabljati po vsej Kitajski in ne samo v nekaterih provincah, kot je pravkar omenil poslanec.