Examples of using Closure of the programme in English and their translations into Slovenian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Official/political
-
Programming
Closure of the programme.
Payment of the balance and closure of the programme.
Closure of the programmes is ongoing;
Use of legacy resources after closure of the programme.
At closure of the programme, the eligible expenditure shall be the total amount of programme contributions paid to the financial instrument, corresponding:(a).
Article 99 Payment of the balance and closure of the programme.
Closure of the programmes is ongoing;the overall error rate for this programming period is best estimated by considering the years when the programme was at"cruising speed", i.e. from 2005 onwards.
Initial pre-financing should be totally cleared at closure of the programme.
At the closure of the programme, any undue payments not recovered other than those referred to under point(h), including any interests thereon, shall be deducted from the expenditure of the financial year in question;
Furthermore, all supporting documentsmust be kept available for three years after the closure of the programme.
Comprehensive checklists and models for the amendment and eventual closure of the programmes were prepared during 2004 as part of the drive to ensure sound financial management and to help identify best practices.
Regulation(EU) No 1083/2006 foresees that a share of 5% of the total EU allocation is retained until closure of the programme.
DG MARE dropped a reservation although the Member Statedid not accept the correction entirely because the closure of the programme concerned is ongoing and the necessary(full) financial correction will be made by the Commission in the closure exercise.
Pursuant to the monitoring mechanisms,income may be taken into account for as long as three years after closure of the programme.
(yy) providing a declaration at the closure of the programme assessing the validity of the application for payment of the final balance and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions covered by the final statement of expenditure supported by a final control report.
In the current legal framework,conformity clearance decisions can continue to be taken even after the closure of the programme.
If at the closure of the programme, the total amount spent on the operations referred to in paragraph 5a of this Article is lower than the amount referred to in Article 16a(3)(b), the difference shall be reimbursed by the Member State to the Community budget up to the amount by which the total allocations available for operations other than those referred to in Article 16a have been exceeded.
In the current legal framework for rural development,conformity clearance decisions can continue to be taken even after the closure of the programme.
If, at the closure of the programme, the actual amount of Community contribution spent on the operations referred to in Article 16a(1) is lower than the total of the amounts referred to in paragraph 5a of this Article, the difference shall be reimbursed by the Member State to the general budget of the European Communities up to the amount by which the total allocations available for operations other than those referred to in Article 16a(1) have been exceeded.
In addition, if, at the closure of the programme, the actual amount of Community contribution spent on the operations referred to in Article 16a(1)(a) to(f) is lower than the amount referred to in paragraph 5a of this Article for those types of operations, the difference shall be reimbursed by the Member State to the general budget of the European Communities up to the amount by which the allocations available for operations referred to in Article 16a(1)(g) have been exceeded.
As a general rule, the last commitment tranche(i.e. 2006)will be used to execute final payments once the closure of the programme is agreed between the Member State and the Commission services.
In rural development, however, programme expenditure was cleared annually and the Commissioncontinues its verifications of legality and regularity even after the formal closure of the programme.
As the Court rightly points it out, implementation of financial corrections, from the recent years,will mainly occur at the closure of the programme where the regulatory ceiling for interim payments has been reached.
Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to ensure that the capital resources and gains and other earnings or yields attributable to the support from the CSF Funds to financial instruments are used in accordance with the aims of the programme for aperiod of at least 10 years after the closure of the programme.
As mentioned by the Court itself in paragraph 1.44, most financial corrections in Cohesion accepted at this late stage of the programmingperiod 2000-2006 will be implemented at the closure of the programme, and not in the year when they were made or when the financial correction was confirmed.
Notwithstanding the validity of the principle stated in the second part of the Court's comment, it should be noted that, for instance, in the case of the financial engineering instruments(FEI's) the legal basis foreseesonly one eligibility check of the expenses incurred, at the closure of the programme or at the end of the programming period(whichever comes first).
Moreover, by way of derogation from the rule of carry over, it should be allowed to carry over commitment appropriations available at the end of the financial year,arising from repayments of payment on account, until the closure of the programme, and to use those commitment appropriations when other commitment appropriations are no longer available.