What is the translation of " TO THE LOCAL LOOP " in Slovenian?

• do krajevne zanke

Examples of using To the local loop in English and their translations into Slovenian

Conditions for unbundled access to the local loop.
Pogoji za razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke.

This Regulation shall apply to unbundled access to the local loops and related facilities of notified operators as defined in Article 2(a).
Ta uredba se uporablja za razvezani dostop do krajevnih zank in pripadajočih zmogljivosti prigla�enih obratovalcev, kot je določeno v členu 2(a).

The Communication on unbundled access to the local loop.
Sporočilo o razvezanem dostopu do krajevne zanke.

The principle that rates for unbundled access to the local loop are to be set on the basis of costorientation, laid down in Article 3(3) of Regulation No 2887/2000 on unbundled access to the local loop.
V skladu z načelom stro�kovne naravnanosti cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke iz člena 3(3) Uredbe �t. 2887/2000 o razvezanem dostopu do krajevne zanke.

Council of 18 December 2000 on unbundled access to the local loop 2(‘the regulation').
Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o razvezanem dostopu do krajevne zanke 2.

In fixing the tariffs for unbundled access to the local loop, account must be taken of the costs which the notified operator had to incur for the investments made in putting its local infrastructures in place.
Pri določanju cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke je namreč treba upo�tevati stro�ke, ki jih je imel prigla�eni obratovalec v okviru naložb, izvedenih za vzpostavitev krajevne infrastrukture.

Article 4 repeals Regulation(EC) No 2887/2000 on unbundled access to the local loop.
Člen 4 razveljavlja Uredbo(ES) št. 2887/2000 o razvezanem dostopu do krajevne zanke.

The first concerns the definition of the principle that rates for unbundled access to the local loop are to be set on the basis of costorientation, as laid down in Article 3(3) of Regulation No 2887/2000.
Prvi se nana�a na opredelitev načela stro�kovne naravnanosti cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke, kot je to določeno v členu 3(3) Uredbe �t. 2887/2000.

Access to the fixed public telephone network, including unbundled access to the local loop.
Dostop do fiksnega javnega telefonskega omrežja, vključno z razvezanim dostopom do krajevne zanke.

Approximation of laws- Telecommunications sector- Unbundled access to the local loop- Regulation No 2887/2000- Principle that rates for unbundled access to the local loop are to be set on the basis of costorientation.
Približevanje zakonodaj- Sektor za telekomunikacije- Razvezan dostop do krajevne zanke- Uredba št. 2887/2000- Načelo stroškovne naravnanosti cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke.

Passive network infrastructure: duct access, access to dark fibre and/or unbundled access to the local loop.
Za pasivno omrežno infrastrukturo: dostop do vodov, temnih vlaken in/ali razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke.

Telecommunications sector- Unbundled access to the local loop- Regulation No 2887/2000- Principle that rates for unbundled access to the local loop are to be set on the basis of cost-orientation- Application: judgment of 24 April 2008(Arcor, C-55/06).
Sektor za telekomunikacije- Razvezan dostop do krajevne zanke- Uredba �t. 2887/2000- Načelo stro�kovne naravnanosti cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke- Uporaba: sodba z dne 24. aprila 2008(Arcor, C-55/06).

ADSL-based broadband networks: unbundled access to the local loop, bitstream access.
Za širokopasovna omrežja, ki temeljijo na ADSL: razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke in dostop do bitnega toka.

The reference was made in the context of a dispute between Arcor AG& Co. KG(‘Arcor') and the Federal Republic of Germany concerning partial approval of the rates of Deutsche Telekom AG(‘Deutsche Telekom') for access to the local loop. I- 2978.
Ta predlog je bil vložen v okviru spora med družbo Arcor AG&Co. KG(v nadaljevanju: Arcor) in Bundesrepublik Deutschland zaradi delne odobritve cen družbe Deutsche Telekom AG(v nadaljevanju: Deutsche Telekom) za dostop do krajevne zanke. I- 2978.

(c)"full unbundled access to the local loop" means the provision to a beneficiary of access to the local loop or local sub-loop of the SMP operator allowing the use of the full capacity of the network infrastructure;
(c)„povsem razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke“ pomeni zagotovitev dostopa upravičencu do krajevne zanke ali krajevne podzanke obratovalca s pomembno tržno močjo z dovoljenjem uporabe celotne zmogljivosti omrežne infrastrukture;

See recital(3) of the regulation and the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on unbundled access to the local loop(COM(2000) 394 final, OJ 2000 C 365 E, p. 212).
Glej tretjo uvodno izjavo Uredbe ter predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razvezanem dostopu do krajevne zanke (COM(2000)394 konč., UL C 365 E, str. 212).

On 25 May 2000 the Commission adopted Recommendation 2000/417/EC on unbundled access to the local loop to enable the competitive provision of a full range of electronic communications services including broadband multimedia and highspeed Internet(OJ 2000 L 156, p. 44).
Komisija je 25. maja 2000 sprejela Priporočilo 2000/417/ES o razvezanem dostopu do krajevne zanke, ki omogoča konkurenčno ponudbo polnega obsega storitev elektronskega komuniciranja, vključno s �irokopasovnimi multimediji in internetom visoke hitrosti(UL L 156, str. 44).

This reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Articles 1(4), 3(3) and 4(1) to(3) of Regulation(EC) No 2887/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on unbundled access to the local loop(OJ 2000 L 336, p. 4).
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se nana�a na razlago členov 1(4), 3(3) in 4 od(1) do(3) Uredbe(ES) �t. 2887/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o razvezanem dostopu do krajevne zanke(UL L 336, str. 4).

Regulation No 2887/2000 must be interpreted as meaning that, during the procedure supervising the pricing for unbundled access to the local loop conducted by a national regulatory authority pursuant to Article 4 of that regulation, it is for the notified operator to provide the evidence that its rates respect the principle that rates are to be set on the basis of costorientation.
Uredbo št. 2887/2000 je treba razlagati tako, da mora v postopku nadzora nad oblikovanjem cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke, ki ga nacionalni regulativni organ vodi v skladu s členom 4 navedene uredbe, dokaz, da njegove cene upoštevajo načelo stroškovne naravnanosti cen, predložiti priglašeni obratovalec.

As regards Article 3(3) of that regulation, it should also be pointed out that it merely states, in a general manner, that notified operators are to charge prices for unbundled access to the local loop set on the basis of costorientation, without any further details.
Glede člena 3(3) te uredbe pa je treba prav tako opozoriti, da se omejuje na splo�no navedbo, da prigla�eni obratovalci zaračunavajo cene za razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke na podlagi stro�kovne naravnanosti, pri čemer ne vsebuje podrobnej�ih določb.

Regulation No 2887/2000 on unbundled access to the local loop must be interpreted as meaning that, during the procedure supervising the pricing for unbundled access to the local loop conducted by a national regulatory authority pursuant to Article 4 of that regulation, it is for the notified operator to provide the evidence that its rates respect the principle that rates are to be set on the basis of costorientation.
Uredbo �t. 2887/2000 o razvezanem dostopu do krajevne zanke je treba razlagati tako, da mora v postopku nadzora nad oblikovanjem cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke, ki ga nacionalni regulativni organ vodi v skladu s členom 4 navedene uredbe, dokaz, da njegove cene upo�tevajo načelo stro�kovne naravnanosti cen, predložiti prigla�eni obratovalec.

In those circumstances, it follows that the broad discretion granted by Regulation No 2887/2000 to the NRAs as regards the assessment of pricing aspects of unbundled access to the local loop also concerns the evaluation of the costs incurred by the notified operator.
Iz tega izhaja, da se �iroke pristojnosti, ki jih daje Uredba �t. 2887/2000 NRO v zvezi s presojo cenovnih vidikov razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke, nana�ajo tudi na oceno stro�kov, ki jih ima prigla�eni obratovalec.

That analysis showed that the national regulatory authorities have an indisputable margin of discretion when implementing the principle of costorientation, both when deciding which of the cost elements supplied by the local loop provider to take into account and when deciding on the method to be used to calculate the costs connected with provision of access to the local loop.
Ta analiza je pokazala, da imajo nacionalni regulativni organi neizpodbitno diskrecijsko pravico pri izvajanju načela stro�kovne naravnanosti pri določanju elementov posameznih stro�kov ponudnika krajevne zanke, ki se upo�tevajo, in pri opredelitvi metode, ki se uporabi za izračun ustreznih stro�kov zagotavljanja krajevne zanke.

This Regulation aims at intensifying competition and stimulating technological innovation on the local access market, through the setting of harmonised conditions for unbundled access to the local loop, to foster the competitive provision of a wide range of electronic communications services.
Cilj te uredbe je okrepiti konkurenco in spodbuditi tehnolo�ke inovacije na trgu krajevnega dostopa z določitvijo usklajenih pogojev za razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke, da bi se pospe�ilo konkurenčno zagotavljanje �irokega nabora elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.

In the case in the main proceedings, it must be found that Arcor, having concluded with the notified operator a contract concerning access to the local loops, is a party affected within the meaning of Article 5b(3) of Directive 90/387, because a decision of the NRA concerning the requirements regarding the costorientation of rates for unbundled access to the local loop necessarily affects its rights as a party to such a contract.
V postopku v glavni stvari je treba ugotoviti, da je družba Arcor, ki je s prigla�enim obratovalcem sklenila pogodbo o razvezanem dostopu do krajevnih zank, prizadeta stranka v smislu člena 5a(3) Direktive 90/387, saj odločitev NRO o zahtevah glede stro�kovne naravnanosti cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke neizogibno vpliva na pravice, ki jih ima kot stranka pogodbe.

By a series of questions the national court asks the Court of Justice to interpret several provisions of Regulation No 2887/2000 and, in particular, those relating to the principle that rates for unbundled access to the local loop are to be set on the basis of costorientation.
Predložitveno sodi�če s to serijo vpra�anj Sodi�ču predlaga, da poda razlago več določb Uredbe �t. 2887/2000, zlasti tistih, ki se nana�ajo na načelo stro�kovne naravnanosti cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke.

By its first question the national court asks whether Article 1(4) of Regulation No 2887/2000 must be understood as meaning that the principle that rates for access to the local loop are to be set on the basis of costorientation, laid down in Article 3(3) of that regulation, constitutes a minimum requirement from which national law of the Member States may not deviate to the prejudice of beneficiaries.
Predložitveno sodi�če se s prvim vpra�anjem spra�uje, ali je treba člen 1(4) Uredbe �t. 2887/2000 razumeti tako, da načelo stro�kovne naravnanosti cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke iz člena 3(3) navedene uredbe predstavlja minimalni pogoj, od katerega nacionalna zakonodaja držav članic ne sme odstopati v �kodo upravičencev.

That provision thus lays down many specific obligations which may be imposed on operators. Among them, in particular, are the obligation to give third parties access to specified network elements and/or facilities, including unbundled access to the local loop, and the obligation to negotiate in good faith with undertakings requesting access.
V isti določbi so na�tete tudi �tevilne posebne obveznosti, ki so lahko naložene obratovalcem, med drugim, da omogočijo tretjim osebam dostop do določenih omrežnih elementov in/ali naprav vključno z razvezanim dostopom do krajevne zanke in da se v dobri veri pogajajo s podjetji, ki zahtevajo dostop.

Where the financing of universal service is solely cost-orientated, connection to the local loop, the ultimate beneficiary of which is the customer concerned, is subsidised by that beneficiary through the subscriber line charge and only if the pre-existing operator had difficulties rebalancing its tariffs, which did not occur in the present case, would it make sense to value the deficit 54and compensate for it, although obviously not when the losses are the result of the operator's own business strategy.
Financiranje univerzalne storitve zgolj glede na dejanske stro�ke pomeni, da stro�ek povezave s krajevno zanko, katere končni uporabnik je konkretni naročnik, krije prav ta uporabnik s plačilom naročnine, tako da je le v primeru, da ima prej�nji operater težave z uskladitvijo tarif- kar pa se v obravnavanem primeru ni zgodilo- smiselna ocenitev izgube 54 in njena izravnava, kar pa gotovo ne velja v primeru, če je izgube zakrivila strategija podjetja.

Contrary to what Deutsche Telekom, the German Government and the Federal Republic of Germany, as a party to the dispute before the referring court, maintain, it is my view that Community law confers upon competitors as beneficiaries of access to the local loop, such as Arcor in this case, the right to bring proceedings to contest rates which have not been set on the basis of costorientation.
V nasprotju s trditvami družbe Deutsche Telekom, nem�ke vlade in Zvezne republike Nemčije kot strankami v sporu pred predložitvenim sodi�čem menim, da pravo Skupnosti podeljuje konkurentom, upravičenim do dostopa do krajevne zanke, kot je v obravnavanem primeru družba Arcor, pravico, da pred sodi�čem izpodbijajo cene, ki niso stro�kovno naravnane.