What is the translation of " VALIDITY AND INTERPRETATION " in Slovenian?

• veljavnosti in razlage
• veljavnosti in razlagi

Examples of using Validity and interpretation in English and their translations into Slovenian

The validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the EU.
Veljavnosti in razlage aktov institucij, organov, uradov ali agencij Unije.

Article 267 TFEU provides that the courts and tribunals of the Member States may refer questions concerning the validity and interpretation of the acts of such bodies to the Court.
V skladu s členom 267 PDEU lahko sodišča držav članic postavijo Sodišču vprašanja glede veljavnosti in razlage aktov teh teles.

(b) the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions of the Community and of the ECB;
(b) veljavnosti in razlage aktov institucij Skupnosti in ECB;

Furthermore, the Court of Justice has, in accordance with Article 267 TFEU, competence to give preliminary rulings upon request of national judicial authorities on the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies or agencies of the Union.
Poleg tega je Sodišče v skladu s členom 267 PDEU pristojno za predhodno odločanje na zahtevo nacionalnih pravosodnih organov glede veljavnosti in razlage aktov institucij, organov ali agencij Unije.

(b) the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions of the Community and of the ECB;
(b) veljavnosti in razlage aktov institucij, organov, uradov ali agencij Unije.

The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning: a the interpretation of the Constitution; b the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union.
Sodišče Evropske unije je pristojno za predhodno odločanje o vprašanjih glede: a razlage Ustave; b veljavnosti in razlage aktov institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije.

The Court of Justice has exclusive competence with regard to the validity and interpretation of the acts of the institutions, bodies, offices, or agencies of the EU, in accordance with point(b) of the first paragraph of Article 267 of the TFEU.
O veljavnosti in razlagi aktov institucij, organov, uradov ali agencij EU je na podlagi b točke prvega odstavka 267. člena PDEU izključno pristojno presojati Sodišče.

It should be noted that accession does not grant the EU membership of the Council of Europe, or call into question the autonomy of Union law, since the CJEU remains the only authority adjudicating on issues relating to the validity and interpretation of Union law.
Upoštevati je treba, da pristop ne jamči članstva EU v Svetu oziroma ne postavlja pod vprašaj avtonomnosti prava Unije, ker Sodišče Evropske unije ostaja edini organ, ki razsoja o vprašanjih glede veljavnosti in razlag prava Unije.

In that situation, it considers that the Court has exclusive jurisdiction to answer questions as to the validity and interpretation of that rule, so that it can thereafter assess, in the case pending before it, the constitutionality of the provisions at issue of the national legislation.
Da je v takem primeru Sodišče izključno pristojno za odgovor na vprašanja v zvezi z veljavnostjo in razlago te določbe, da bi lahko nato Ustavno sodišče v zadevi, ki mu je bila predložena, odločilo o ustavnosti spornih določb nacionalne zakonodaje.

Under Article 35 of the Treaty, the Court has jurisdiction, upon request of a Member State's court or tribunal, to give preliminary rulings on the validity or interpretation of framework decisions and decisions, on the interpretation of conventions established under Title VI of the Treaty, and on the validity and interpretation of the measures implementing them.
V skladu s členom 35 Pogodbe ima Sodišče pristojnost, da na zahtevo sodišča države članice predhodno odloča o veljavnosti ali razlagi okvirnih sklepov in sklepov, o razlagi konvencij, sprejetih v okviru naslova VI Pogodbe, ter o veljavnosti in razlagi ukrepov za njihovo izvajanje.

Where a Member State has indicated that it accepts the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice to rule on the validity and interpretation of the acts referred to in Article 35 EU, the Court of Justice has jurisdiction to give a preliminary ruling on a question from a judge in charge of preliminary enquiries.
Ko država članica izjavi, da priznava pristojnost Sodišča za odločanje o veljavnosti in razlagi aktov, navedenih v členu 35 EU, je Sodišče pristojno, da odgovori na predhodno vprašanje, ki ga je postavil sodnik, zadolžen za preiskavo.

It is clear from the wording of Article 267 TFEU itself that the Court has a very broad jurisdiction and that, acting in a spirit of cooperation, the Court is, in general, reluctant to declare inadmissible questions referred by national courts or tribunals on the interpretation of the Treaties or the validity and interpretation of acts of the European Union's institutions.
Iz besedila člena 267 PDEU jasno izhaja, da je pristojnost Sodišča zelo obsežna in da Sodišče, ki deluje v duhu medsebojnega sodelovanja, načelno ni naklonjeno zavračanju vprašanj, ki jih predložijo nacionalna sodišča in ki zadevajo razlago Pogodb ali veljavnost in razlago aktov institucij Unije, kot nedopustnih.

When a question of interpretation of the[EC Treaty] or the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions of the European Community is raised before the Court of First Instance, it may, if it considers this necessary to enable it to give a decision, request the Court of Justice… to decide on the question.
Če se pred sodiščem prve stopnje postavi vprašanje razlage Pogodbe[ES] ali veljavnosti in razlage aktov institucij Evropske skupnosti, lahko to sodišče, če je po njegovem mnenju to potrebno za dosego odločitve, od Sodišča[…] zahteva, da odloči v zvezi z vprašanjem.

As stated in paragraph 5 of this judgment, the Italian Republic indicated by a declaration which took effect on 1 May 1999, the date on which the Treaty of Amsterdam came into force, that it accepted the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice to rule on the validity and interpretation of the acts referred to in Article 35 EU in accordance with the rules laid down in paragraph 3(b) of that article.
Kot je navedeno v točki 5 te sodbe, je Italijanska republika v izjavi, ki velja od 1. maja 1999, torej od dne, ko je začela veljati Amsterdamska pogodba, navedla, da priznava pristojnost Sodišča za odločanje o veljavnosti in razlagi aktov, navedenih v členu 35 EU, v skladu z določbo odstavka 3(b) tega člena.

Gives the following Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the validity and interpretation of points 40 to 46 of the Communication from the Commission on the application, from 1 August 2013, of State aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis(‘Banking Communication') OJ 2013, C 216, p.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se nanaša na veljavnost in razlago točk od 40 do 46 Sporočila Komisije o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za podporne ukrepe v korist bank v okviru finančne krize od 1. avgusta 2013 dalje(v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporočilo o bančništvu) UL 2013, C 216, str.

The Court of Justice of the European Communities shall have jurisdiction, subject to the conditions laid down in this Article, to give preliminary rulings on the validity and interpretation of framework decisions and decisions, on the interpretation of conventions established under this Title and on the validity and interpretation of the measures implementing them.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je ob upoštevanju pogojev iz tega člena pristojno za predhodno odločanje o veljavnosti in razlagi okvirnih sklepov in sklepov o razlagi konvencij na podlagi tega naslova ter o veljavnosti in razlagi ukrepov za njihovo izvajanje.

(Reference for a preliminary ruling- Validity and interpretation of the Banking Communication from the Commission- Interpretation of Directives 2001/24/EC and 2012/30/EU- State aid to banks in the context of the financial crisis- Burden-sharing- Writing off equity capital, hybrid capital and subordinated debt- Principle of protection of legitimate expectations- Right to property- Protection of the interests of shareholders and others- Reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions).
Predhodno odločanje- Veljavnost in razlaga sporočila Komisije o bančništvu- Razlaga direktiv 2001/24/ES in 2012/30/EU- Državne pomoči bankam v okviru finančne krize- Porazdelitev bremena- Izbris lastniškega kapitala delničarjev, hibridnega kapitala in podrejenih dolžniških instrumentov- Načelo varstva legitimnih pričakovanj- Pravica do zasebne lastnine- Varstvo interesov družbenikov in tretjih oseb- Reorganizacija in prenehanje kreditnih institucij“.

CONSIDERING that the Court of Justice of the European Communities should have jurisdiction under the same conditions to give preliminary rulings on questions concerning the validity and interpretation of this Agreement which are raised by a Danish court or tribunal, and that Danish courts and tribunals should therefore request preliminary rulings under the same conditions as courts and tribunals of other Member States in respect of the interpretation of the Regulations and their implementing measures;
OB UPOŠTEVANJU, da bi moralo biti Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti pod enakimi pogoji pristojno za odločanje o predhodnih vprašanjih glede veljavnosti in razlage tega sporazuma, ki jih predloži dansko sodišče, in da bi morala torej danska sodišča v zvezi z razlago Uredb in njunih izvedbenih ukrepov zaprositi za predhodno odločanje pod enakimi pogoji kot sodišča drugih držav članic;

These implementing measures are legally binding only from the date of the entry into force of this Regulation and are without prejudice to the validity of the legislation and interpretation previously adopted by the Member States.
Ukrepi iz omenjene uredbe so pravno zavezujoči šele od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe in ne posegajo v veljavnost zakonodaje in razlage, ki so jih predhodno sprejele države članice.

Efficient interaction between national judges and the European Court of Justice in the framework of the procedure for obtaining a preliminary ruling from the European Court of Justice on the validity and/or interpretation of provisions of European law is of primary importance in order to ensure the coherence of the European legal order.
Učinkovito sodelovanje med nacionalnimi sodniki in Evropskim sodiščem med postopkom predhodnega odločanja Evropskega sodišča o veljavnosti in/ali razlagi določb evropskega prava je nadvse pomembno za zagotavljanje koherentnosti evropske pravne ureditve.

Under the third pillar, Member States must accept the jurisdiction of the Court to give a ruling on the interpretation and validity of the policies developed, through a declaration to this effect.
V skladu s tretjim stebrom morajo države članice sprejeti pristojnost Sodišča za izdajo sklepa o razlagi in veljavnosti razvitih politik prek izjave v ta namen.

Establish the validity of the methods used and the interpretation of the results.
Se prepričati o verodostojnosti uporabljenih metod in utemeljenosti razlage pridobljenih rezultatov.

These Terms and any dispute concerning the implementation, interpretation and validity of this agreement are subject to the law, the jurisdiction of the state and to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where the Owner has their registered offices.
Za te pogoje in vsak spor v zvezi z izvajanjem, tolmačenjem in veljavnostjo tega sporazuma, veljajo zakoni, so pristojnost države in pristojnost sodišč, v katerih ima lastnik svoj sedež.

This is however without prejudice to preliminary references concerning the interpretation of any provision of primary law, including the Treaties and the Charter, or the interpretation and validity of any provision of Union secondary law, including this Regulation and applicable Directives.
Vendar to ne vpliva na predhodno odločanje o razlagi katere koli določbe primarnega prava, vključno s Pogodbama in Listino, ali na razlago in veljavnost določb sekundarnega prava Unije, vključno s to uredbo in veljavnimi direktivami.

The decision shall then be notified by the Registrar of the Court to the parties, to the Member States and to the Commission, and also to the Council or to the European Central Bank if the act the validity or interpretation of which is in dispute originates from one of them, and to the European Parliament and the Council if the act the validity or interpretation of which is in dispute was adopted jointly by those two institutions.
Sodni tajnik Sodišča o tej odločitvi nato obvesti zadevne stranke, države članice in Komisijo, če je akt, katerega veljavnost ali razlaga je predmet spora, izdal Svet ali Evropska centralna banka, pa obvesti tudi njiju, ter Evropski parlament in Svet, če sta akt, katerega veljavnost ali razlaga je predmet spora, skupno sprejeli ti dve instituciji.

With regard to the existence of the expressed doubts as to the interpretation of the Banking Communication and its validity due to its inconsistency with primary and secondary EU law, and as to the interpretation of Directive 2001/24/EC, the Constitutional Court cannot decide on the matter until the Court of Justice, which has exclusive jurisdiction to interpret and review the validity of the Banking Communication and Directive 2001/24/EC, decides on their interpretation and validity.
Glede na obstoj prikazanega dvoma glede razlage Sporočila o bančništvu ter glede njegove veljavnosti zaradi neskladnosti s primarnim in sekundarnim pravom EU in glede razlage Direktive 2001/24/ES Ustavno sodišče o zadevi ne more odločiti, dokler Sodišče, ki je izključno pristojno razlagati in presojati veljavnost Sporočila o bančništvu in Direktive 2001/24/ES, ne odloči o njuni razlagi in veljavnosti.