Examples of using Claimant asserted in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Each claimant asserted sole ownership of the business.
In its submission dated July 1997, the Claimant asserted a claim for interest in the amount of KWD 53,595.
Each claimant asserted that he was the sole owner of the business as at 2 August 1990.
In that sub-claim, the claimant asserted that it had paid the consignee of the goods.
The claimant asserted that he required the portfolio when he applied for jobs in the engineering field.
In many instances, the claimant asserted a 100 per cent beneficial interest in the company.
The claimant asserted claims both for the costs of raising the barge as well as for the value of such barge.
In addition to other losses, the claimant asserted a loss of goodwill in the amount of 35,000 Kuwaiti dinars KWD.
The Claimant asserted that the tankers therefore had no useful life after the relevant period.
For example, in UNCC claim No. 3011224 the claimant asserted, in addition to her own losses, a salary loss on behalf of her husband.
The claimant asserted that he attempted to mitigate his losses after the liberation of Kuwait by seeking information about what happened to the two shipments, but was unsuccessful.
For example, in UNCC claim No. 3012049 a claimant asserted losses in the amount of USD 265,034 in connection with a spare parts business.
The Claimant asserted that all debris was removed from the site after the liberation of Kuwait.
With respect to the claim for salaries, the Claimant asserted that part of the amount represented incremental overtime payments made to staff.
The Claimant asserted that the two centres required refurbishment following the loss and damage.
The claimant asserted that his business associates confiscated the businesses after the liberation of Kuwait.
The Claimant asserted that it was therefore deprived of funds to which it would otherwise have been entitled.
Each claimant asserted that he/she was the sole owner of the business as at the date of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The claimant asserted that the refusal of medical treatment exacerbated her medical condition and sought compensation for the injuries.
The claimant asserted that the loss in the value of his shares was a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Claimant asserted that approximately 11,000 patrols were carried out during the period of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The claimant asserted that during several attempts to take over the land and build a fence, it was assaulted by municipal guards and other occupants.
The claimant asserted that he was planning to use the teaching materials as a foundation for a textbook in general biochemistry for medical students.
The claimant asserted that he leased both vessels to an Iranian merchant until 30 April 1990, after which time he was unable to find another lessee.
The claimant asserted that his vehicle incurred damage during his travel through the desert from Kuwait to Oman during Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The claimant asserted a loss related to a large computer equipment system that his business had delivered to a customer just before Iraq's invasion of Kuwait.
The claimant asserted that he, his wife and their three children boarded a bus in Kuwait on 9 February 1991 to travel to Jordan and that near the Kuwaiti-Iraqi border the bus was struck by a missile.
During the on-site inspection, the Claimant asserted that three or four years prior to Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, emergency operations procedures were established for implementation in the event of disruption to the telecommunications network.
The claimant asserted that the Iraqi entities failed to pay instalments due under these various loan agreements or the rescheduling agreements(together, the"financing arrangements") as a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
During the on-site inspection, the Claimant asserted that the decision to construct detours was taken by the Claimant to maintain communications throughout Saudi Arabia, and was not related to the Royal Decree, referred to above, lifting weight restrictions on roads.