Examples of using Null hypothesis in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
A null hypothesis?
A z-score evaluates the validity of your null hypothesis.
Therefore, your null hypothesis, H0 would be.
Testing the significance of annual data on flamingo mortality in a soda lake against null hypothesis.
The null hypothesis tested was then accepted.
A Type I error is often referred to as a"false positive" andis the incorrect rejection of the true null hypothesis in favor of the alternative.
Suppose that your null hypothesis is actually true.
Null hypothesis may be formalized by asserting that a population parameter, or a combination of population parameters, has a certain value.
It has also been argued that the actual quake differed from the kind expected(Jackson& Kagan 2006), andthat the prediction was no more significant than a simpler null hypothesis Kagan 1997.
However, the null hypothesis would be that there was no significant difference, and to test if this was true, a high statistical power would be needed.
Neyman first introduced the modern concept of a confidence interval into statistical hypothesis testing andco-revised Ronald Fisher's null hypothesis testing in collaboration with Egon Pearson.
If the objective of the trial is to compare a drug with the placebo, the null hypothesis will state that there is no difference between the two groups, and the alternative hypothesis that there is a difference.
Given the small sample size, and the need for varieties to be clearly distinguishable from each other,it is open to examination authorities to choose p 0.01 as the upper cut off significance acceptability level of our null hypothesis.
In essence, the normality test is a regular test of a hypothesis that can have two possible outcomes:(1)rejection of the null hypothesis of normality($H_o$), or(2) failure to reject the null hypothesis.
The reasoning is that if the null hypothesis of there being no relation between the two matrices is true, then permuting the rows and columns of the matrix should be equally likely to produce a larger or a smaller coefficient.
But it also increases the risk of obtaining a statistically significant result(i.e. rejecting the null hypothesis) when the null hypothesis is not false; that is, it increases the risk of a type I error false positive.
The approximation is inadequate when sample sizes are small, or the data are very unequally distributed among the cells of the table,resulting in the cell counts predicted on the null hypothesis(the“expected values”) being low.
If the CI included one(1),the results would agree with the null hypothesis, i.e., there is no difference between the groups under study, and this means that the difference between the groups does not have statistical significance at a 0.05 α value.10.
If the test statistic is less(this test is non symmetrical so we do not consider an absolute value) than the(larger negative) critical value,then the null hypothesis of γ 0{\displaystyle\gamma =0} is rejected and no unit root is present.
This increases the chance of rejecting the null hypothesis(i.e. obtaining a statistically significant result) when the null hypothesis is false; that is, it reduces the risk of a type II error false negative regarding whether an effect exists.
To establish the existence of cointegration in a set of time series variables,we wish to reject the trace test null hypothesis($K_o=0$) and not reject the null hypothesis of the maximum eigenvalue test $K_o=m-1.
In this particular case, the null hypothesis(that the varieties are similar on the basis of dark blue vs. not dark blue characteristic) is rejected because the calculated Fisher's probability is much lower than the acceptable level of significance p 0.01.
If the criterion is 0.05,the probability of the data implying an effect at least as large as the observed effect when the null hypothesis is true must be less than 0.05, for the null hypothesis of no effect to be rejected.
For example, to test the null hypothesis that the mean scores of men and women on a test do not differ, samples of men and women are drawn, the test is administered to them, and the mean score of one group is compared to that of the other group using a statistical test such as the two-sample z-test.
Durbin and Watson(1950, 1951) applied this statistic to the residuals from least squares regressions, anddeveloped bounds tests for the null hypothesis that the errors are serially uncorrelated against the alternative that they follow a first order autoregressive process.
The decision is important for the size of the unit root test(the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis of a unit root when there is one) and the power of the unit root test the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis of a unit root when there is not one.
If we are to consider all the other sampling techniques in research, we will all come to a conclusion that the experiment andthe data analysis will either boil down to accepting the null hypothesis or disproving the null hypothesis while accepting the alternative hypothesis. .
Later, John Denis Sargan andAlok Bhargava developed several von Neumann-Durbin-Watson type test statistics for the null hypothesis that the errors on a regression model follow a process with a unit root against the alternative hypothesis that the errors follow a stationary first order autoregression Sargan and Bhargava, 1983.
The data might look like this: The question we ask about these data is: knowing that 10 of these 24 teenagers are studiers, and that 12 of the 24 are female,and assuming the null hypothesis that men and women are equally likely to study, what is the probability that these 10 studiers would be so unevenly distributed between the women and the men?
It is named after its inventor, Ronald Fisher, and is one of a class of exact tests,so called because the significance of the deviation from a null hypothesis(e.g., P-value) can be calculated exactly, rather than relying on an approximation that becomes exact in the limit as the sample size grows to infinity, as with many statistical tests.