Examples of using Source concludes in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The source concludes that, under these circumstances, their pretrial detention was deprived of any legal basis.
Regarding the government statement that the detainees arebeing humanely treated and have access to medical treatment, the source concludes that the main issue in this case is to ascertain that the detainees are still alive and well.
The source concludes that Mr. Hu's detention is in violation of his right to freedom of expression and opinion.
The source concludes that Ms. Darabi was wrongfully, discriminatorily and extra-legally charged and convicted of intentional murder.
The source concludes by stating that the article by Mr. Abbou that was used to incriminate him condemned the use of torture in Tunisia.
The source concludes that these factors have repercussions for the level of expeditiousness, attention to detail and investigation that the court can apply to the different cases.
The source concludes by pointing out that the use of military tribunals in Egypt has become selective, and is currently applied solely to the members of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Thus, the source concludes that Mr. Alufisha was detained illegally from 23 April 2008 until 29 July 2009, and has been detained illegally since 13 July 2009.
The source concludes that the detention of Hilal Mammadov is arbitrary and considers it an obvious attempt to silence his efforts to report on human rights violations.
The source concludes that Zhisheng Gao's detention also violates articles 35, 36, 37, 41, 51 and 125 of the Constitution of China and articles 64, 69 and 75 of its Criminal Procedural Law.
The source concludes that the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Al Jabouri is arbitrary as it is without proper legal basis and violates the guarantees of a fair and just trial.
The source concludes that Mr. Karim Amer has been solely detained on account of the peaceful expression of his views on the Internet criticizing al-Azhar authorities, religious personalities and the Government.
The source concludes by reiterating that there is a wider and generic issue of torture and ill-treatment in Tajikistan, describing it as"widespread in all types of detention facilities in Tajikistan and safeguards are inadequate.
The source concludes that Mr. Nyamoya's detention is a result of the exercise of his freedom of opinion and expression, protected under article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The source concludes that Mr. Eligio Cedeño has been arbitrarily deprived of his liberty for more than two years and three months through criminal proceedings vitiated by grave irregularities and violations of the right to defence and to due process of law.
The source concludes that these individuals were arrested only for internal partisan political reasons, with the aim of displaying before the press successes in efforts to counter terrorism and drug trafficking and undermining the prestige of MAS and its leaders.
The source concludes that the international human rights systems have a duty to protect individuals, not only by providing redress for violations suffered but also by responding to serious situations that cause grave, irreparable harm.
The source concludes that the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Al Rabassi is aimed at punishing him for having expressed a critical opinion of a political leader, and asserts that the criminal proceedings against him failed to comply with the requirements of a fair trial.
The source concludes that the deprivation of freedom is thus due to the expression of his political views, which constituted exercise of the freedom of expression protected by article 19 of the international Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The source concludes that Mr. Al-Shimrani's detention is arbitrary because it fails to meet international standards relating to the right to a fair trial pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The source concludes that Mr. Obaidullah's prolonged and indefinite detention without charge or trial for more than ten years is arbitrary and requests his immediate release from military custody, repatriation to his home country and rehabilitation and compensation measures.
The source concludes that Mr. Chaabane's continued detention after his innocence was confirmed by the arrest of the actual perpetrators, coupled with the Lebanese judicial system's inability to retry him, means that his detention is of an arbitrary nature.
In the light of all these facts, the source concludes that the detention of Mr. de la Cruz Soto runs counter to articles 9 and 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and articles 9 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Panama is a party.
The source concludes that Mr. Elöd Tóásó's detention is arbitrary, being contrary to articles 9 and 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and articles 9 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which the Plurinational State of Bolivia is a party.
The source concludes that Egyptian military tribunals cannot assure that civilians charged with criminal offenses have the right to a fair trial, as stipulated in article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which the Arab Republic of Egypt is a State party.
The source concludes that the detention of Mr. Gallardo Martínez is arbitrary on the grounds that it runs counter to articles 9 and 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and articles 9 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which the United Mexican States is a party.
The source concludes that Mr. Eligio Cedeño has been detained for more than two years and three months without a conclusive trial or judgement, for supposed offences of tax fraud and diversion of resources that the public prosecutors have so far, in the various stages of drawn-out proceedings, been unable to prove.
The source concludes that Mr. Zhang was arrested, sentenced and punished solely on the basis of the Government's opposition to some of his Christian writings, in which he expressed his religious belief in Christianity and his support for the theological independence of China's Christian House Churches.
In the light of the foregoing, the source concludes that Mr. Geloo's deprivation of liberty is arbitrary on the grounds that it lacked any legal basis during the period between 7 November 2006 and 30 October 2008 and it is in total or partial non-observance of the international legal norms relating to fair trial.
The source concludes that the Government's response inadequately responds to the evidence that the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan imprisoned Mr. Turgunov because he was exercising fundamental human rights; convicted him in a trial that failed to meet international standards of due process; and repeatedly subjected him to torture and mistreatment.