Examples of using Syntactically in English and their translations into Ukrainian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Are the sentences syntactically correct?
Not all syntactically correct programs are semantically correct.
The definition of other unique keys is syntactically very similar to primary keys.
Q is syntactically related to C, yet also has some significant differences.
But what else is new syntactically in this example?
Syntactically define the union as(very similar to the definition of the structure).
Students must have a complete syntactically correct program before they get any results.
Is syntactically valid, but not semantically defined, as it uses an uninitialized variable.
The key concepts are: Class: Each class is syntactically started with the keyword class followed by the name of the class.
The location of the language operators according to the keys andcursor modes was thought out in such a way that it was difficult to introduce a syntactically incorrect expression.
Keywords, by contrast, syntactically appear in the phrase grammar, as terminal symbols.
Continuing poetry in prose, Tsvetaeva does not erase, but the line moves, existing between them in the mass consciousness,in hitherto inaccessible language syntactically sphere- up.
Text, certainly, syntactically complex, making it an excellent material for debugging applications.
For example, 2+ 2{\displaystyle 2+2} and 4{\displaystyle 4}are syntactically different terms, but the former reduces to the latter.
Is syntactically valid at the phrase level, but the correctness of the types of a and b can only be determined at runtime, as variables do not have types in Python, only values do.
It had a programming language that was known as‘mocklisp', which looks syntactically like Lisp, but didn't have the data structures of Lisp.
Gödel's incompleteness theorem shows that any recursive system that is sufficiently powerful, such as Peano arithmetic,cannot be both consistent and syntactically complete.
Because, in terms of typing C, especially C++, syntactically“simply addresses” or“some addresses” in general there is no(except that except void*).
While it's doubtful many have seen this particular configuration of words, nonetheless most readers should beable to glean an understanding of this sentence because it is syntactically correct and the constituent parts are understood.
Because, in terms of typing C, especially C++, syntactically"simply addresses" or"certain addresses" does not exist at all(except that except void*). All typed pointers….
A consequence of this is that in many implementations,operating on a variable with automatic or static lifetime through a reference, although syntactically similar to accessing it directly, can involve hidden dereference operations that are costly.
A formal system S is syntactically complete or deductively complete or maximally complete if for each sentence(closed formula) φ of the language of the system either φ or¬φ is a theorem of S.
(Thus, by definition, an EUI-48 is not in fact a"MAC address",although it is syntactically indistinguishable from one and assigned from the same numbering space.).
Syntactically, MATH-MATIC was similar to Univac's contemporaneous business-oriented language, FLOW-MATIC, differing in providing algebraic-style expressions and floating-point arithmetic, and arrays rather than record structures.
Reason's lexical scoping is exactly the same as OCaml's, but let bindings syntactically resemble"block scope" which is more familiar to many developers.
The following C language fragment is syntactically correct, but performs an operation that is not semantically defined(because p is a null pointer, the operations p->real and p->im have no meaning).
One is the"advanced transport", which is very flexible in terms of formatting,and is syntactically similar to Lisp-style expressions, but they are not identical.
The syntax of a programming language is usually described using a combination of the following two components: a regular expression describing its lexemes, and a context-free grammar which describes howlexemes may be combined to form a syntactically correct program.
Many syntactically correct programs are nonetheless ill-formed, per the language's rules; and may(depending on the language specification and the soundness of the implementation) result in an error on translation or execution. In some cases, such programs may exhibit undefined behavior.
Syntactic categories are defined by rules called productions, which specify the values that belong to a particular syntactic category.[1] Terminal symbols are the concrete characters or strings of characters(for example keywords such as define, if, let, or void) from which syntactically valid programs are constructed.
