Examples of using Two particles in English and their translations into Vietnamese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
This relationship means that the two particles are entangled.
Now, consider two particles interacting in some fashion.
This little bump indicated that we were seeing an unexpectedly large number ofcollisions whose debris consisted of only two photons, two particles of light.
For example, experimenters can create two particles flying in opposite directions.
When two particles collide at almost the speed of light, the quantum world takes over.
For instance, an experimentalist might create two particles that fly off in opposing directions.
When two particles collide with high energies, they generally break into pieces, but these pieces are not smaller than the original particles. .
In physics, a cross section describes the likelihood of two particles interacting under certain conditions.
If that happened, the two particles involved in the collision would bounce off in random directions.
The situation is analyzed using Galilean transformations and conservation of momentum(for generality,rather than kinetic energies alone), for two particles of mass m1 and m2, moving at initial velocities(before collision) u1 and u2 respectively.
Experiments showed that two particles separated I space and time demonstrated a connectivity.
The way we always do, by slamming together two protons--(Laughter) Hard enough that the collision reverberates into any extra-spatial dimensions that might be there, momentarily creating this hyperdimensional graviton that then snaps back into the three dimensions of the LHCand spits off two photons, two particles of light.
Quantum entanglement involves two particles that affect each other's position, even at a distance.
The system is unstable: the two particles annihilate each other to predominantly produce two or three gamma-rays, depending on the relative spin states.
Violations can occurwhen the environment becomes involved in the interaction between the two particles in some way, such as when an environment moves with respect to the two particles.
In a field model, rather than two particles attracting each other, the particles distort spacetime via their mass, and this distortion is what is perceived and measured as a"force".
Which particle is sending out a photon andwhich is receiving the photon if the two particles are identical as quantum mechanics tells us about fundamental particles? .
Because the combined spin of the two particles is zero, this measurement tells us that the spin of particle 2 must be'down.'.
The process exploits acurious quantum property called entanglement, by which two particles, such as photons, become so closely linked that they share the same existence.
To oversimplify somewhat, the gravitational interaction between two particles has a certain amount of energy, which produces an additional gravitational interaction with its own energy, and so on, spiraling to higher energies with each extra piece.
The reason that this is regarded as aparadox is that it seemingly involves communication between two particles at speeds greater than the speed of light, which is a conflict with Einstein's theory of relativity.
The orbit[definition needed] and energy levels of the two particles are similar to that of the hydrogen atom(which is a bound state of a proton and an electron).
Breit and Wheeler suggested it should be possible to turnlight into matter by smashing together only two particles of light? photons? to create an electron and a positron? the simplest method of turning light into matter ever predicted.
Under a principle known as quantum entanglement, two particles can be linked together regardless of distance, forming what scientists call a quantum entangled pair.
This causes a tiny nuclear reaction in which the mass of the two particles is converted into two high-energy photons, similar to X-rays, that shoot out in opposite directions.
The classical theory(or a common sense theory)would say that the two particles had definite states when created, it was just that we do not know what they are until we test one of them.
Breit and Wheeler suggested that it shouldbe possible to smash together only two particles of light(photons) together, to create an electron and a positron- this is the ever predicted simplest method of turning light into matter.
And that's like an ice cream cone compared to theinsane shit quantum mechanics tells us- like two particles across the universe from one another being mysteriously linked to each other's behavior, or a cat that's both alive and dead at the same time, until you look at it.
He pottered around his office, pondering one of the central riddles of quantum physics:how two particles fired simultaneously from the same source could arrive at the same destination at the same instant, even though one had to travel ten times as far as the other?