Примеры использования Acts of intimidation or reprisal на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Urges Governments to prevent and refrain from all acts of intimidation or reprisal against those who.
Describe the personal risk run by the complainant, witnesses, relatives of the disappeared person or their defence counsel, or by persons participating in the investigation for example,pressure or acts of intimidation or reprisal.
Urges all States to prevent and refrain from all acts of intimidation or reprisal against those who.
Urged Governments to refrain from all acts of intimidation or reprisal against those who seek to cooperateor have cooperated with representatives of United Nations human rights bodies, or who have provided testimony or information to them; and.
Description of the personal risk faced by this person or these persons e.g.,pressure, acts of intimidation or reprisal.
During the period under review, information was received about acts of intimidation or reprisal following cooperation with the Secretary-General, the Security Council, special procedures, treaty bodies and the universal periodic review mechanism.
Description of the personal risk faced by this person or these persons e.g.,pressure, acts of intimidation or reprisal.
The Commission also urged Governments to refrain from all acts of intimidation or reprisal against, inter alia, those who submit or have submitted communications under procedures established by human rights instruments.
In accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 12/2, the present report contains information regarding acts of intimidation or reprisal against those who.
Finally, COHRE agrees with the Committee that Governments must refrain from all acts of intimidation or reprisal against those persons or groups that submitor have submitted communications under the optional protocol.
In accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 12/2,the present report contains information regarding acts of intimidation or reprisal against those who.
During the period under review, information was received about acts of intimidation or reprisal following cooperation with OHCHR, the Human Rights Council, special procedures, human rights treaty bodies, the universal periodic review mechanism and United Nations peace missions.
The Special Rapporteur urges the Government of Myanmar to release Daw Aung San Suu Kyi andto ensure that there are no threats or acts of intimidation or reprisal towards her.
The Secretary-General's report on reprisals has indicated that information was received about acts of intimidation or reprisal following cooperation with United Nations human rights mechanisms including the treaty bodies.
Each State Party shall take steps to ensure that all persons involved in the investigation- including the complainant, the relatives of the disappeared person, legal counsel, witnesses andthose conducting the investigation- are protected against ill-treatment and any acts of intimidation or reprisal as a result of the complaint or investigation.
During the period under review, information was received about acts of intimidation or reprisal following cooperation with OHCHR, the Human Rights Council, the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Indigenous Populations, special procedures, treaty bodies and the universal periodic review mechanism.
In accordance with Commission on Human Rights resolution 2005/9,this report contains information regarding acts of intimidation or reprisal against the following categories of individuals.
During the period under review, information was received about acts of intimidation or reprisal following cooperation with OHCHR, the Human Rights Council, special procedures, human rights treaty bodies, the universal periodic review mechanism, the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women and United Nations peace missions.
In accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 12/2,the present report contains information regarding acts of intimidation or reprisal against individuals or groups who.
Acknowledging that acts of intimidation or reprisal carried out or tolerated by the State undermine and often violate human rights, and underscoring that States should investigate any alleged act of intimidation or reprisal, ensure accountability and effective remedies and take steps to prevent further intimidation and reprisals. .
The European Union echoed previous calls of the High Commissioner for States to put a stop to any acts of intimidation or reprisal against individuals and groups who cooperated with United Nations.
Under current arrangements,the Council receives once a year a report addressing acts of intimidation or reprisal against four categories of individuals: those cooperating with representatives of United Nations human rights bodies; those who have cooperated with United Nations human rights procedures; those who have submitted communications under established procedures; and the relatives of human rights victims.
The Special Rapporteur is alarmed at the above-mentioned reports andjoins the Human Rights Council in condemning all acts of intimidation or reprisal against individuals that cooperate with the human rights instruments.
States should refrain from all acts of intimidation or reprisal against defenders who have sought to cooperateor have cooperated with United Nations human rights bodies, those who have availed themselves of procedures established by the United Nations, those who have provided legal assistance to victims, those who have submitted communications under procedures established by human rights instruments, and those who are relatives of victims of human rights violations.
The Committee determined that the State party had interfered with the complainant's right of petition andreaffirmed that a State party is required to abstain from any acts of intimidation or reprisal against complainants, their families and/or authorized representatives.
At the endof the twenty-third session, the President emphasized that, as stressed by many delegations, any acts of intimidation or reprisal against individuals and groups who cooperateor have cooperated with the United Nations and its representatives were unacceptable and must end.
In conclusion, Mr. Takács expressed the hope that the panel discussion would highlight the importance of the issue at hand and provide innovative andfuture-oriented solutions with the aim of stopping and preventing acts of intimidation or reprisal as a consequence of cooperation with the United Nations in the field of human rights.
Encourages States to provide information, as appropriate, to the Human Rights Council on all measures taken to prevent and address acts of intimidation or reprisal against those who seek to cooperate, cooperate or have cooperated with the United Nations, its representatives and mechanisms in the field of human rights, including on cases mentioned in the reports of the Secretary-General;
He added that such a practice would clearly be in contravention of Commission on Human Rights resolution 1995/75 which urges Governments to refrain from all acts of intimidation or reprisal to those who have provided testimonyor information to representatives of United Nations human rights bodies.
The Mission also was guided by Commission on Human Rights resolution 2005/9 which"urges Governments to refrain from all acts of intimidation or reprisal against(a) those who seek to cooperateor have cooperated with representatives of United Nations human rights bodies, or who have provided testimony or information to them.