Примеры использования Agreement was expressed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Agreement was expressed with the concept of paragraph 4.
While attention was drawn to the importance which the Commission had attached to the provisions on dispute settlement, agreement was expressed with those members of the Commission who had thought the criticisms of such a compulsory mechanism groundless.
Agreement was expressed with the broad policy underlying subparagraph f.
On the one hand, agreement was expressed with the view of the Special Rapporteur that estoppel should not be the subject of study by the Commission.
Agreement was expressed with the proposed merger of articles 14 and 15.
Concerning paragraph(b), agreement was expressed with the Special Rapporteur's suggestion that the Commission not embark on a comprehensive definition of armed conflict.
Agreement was expressed by some delegations with the definition of disaster, provided that it was understood not to include armed conflicts.
Agreement was expressed with the view that articles 12 and 13 of the draft articles submitted by the Special Rapporteur were unnecessary.
Agreement was expressed on the criteria for selecting the thematic evaluations, which follow the criteria used for selecting in-depth evaluations.
Likewise, agreement was expressed with the Special Rapporteur's preference to exclude internally displaced persons(IDPs) and people in transit.
Agreement was expressed with the Special Rapporteur's view that cooperation was an essential part of the obligations under articles 11 and 12.
Agreement was expressed with the Special Rapporteur's view in his second report that the question of compensation arose only in cases of distress and necessity.
General agreement was expressed with the Commission's decision, on the recommendation of the Special Rapporteur, not to include the doctrine of"clean hands" in the draft articles.
Agreement was expressed regarding the focus on the role of women as active participants in the efforts to improve shelter conditions and urban governance, under subprogramme 1.
Agreement was expressed with the Commission's view that work on the topic should proceed in such a way that first reading of a draft would be completed within the current quinquennium.
While agreement was expressed with the principle that international organizations were bound by peremptory norms, it was questioned whether they could breach them.
In addition, agreement was expressed with the view that it was not realistic to think that parties contemplate the effect of an armed conflict on a treaty at the time of its conclusion.
General agreement was expressed with the assertion that the primary responsibility for the protection of persons and provision of humanitarian assistance on an affected State's territory lay with that State.
Agreement was expressed on the importance of an independent lessons-learned exercise that had been announced by the Assistant High Commissioner and some suggestions were made as to its scope.
Agreement was expressed with the Commission's views concerning chapter V. The provisions of chapter V were described as being related to the general principles of law, since they were well represented in national law.
Agreement was expressed with the view that provisional application was not to be encouraged or discouraged, but should instead be understood as a legal concept with its accompanying international consequences.
Agreement was expressed for the provisions of the present draft principle, noting that the draft principlewas consistent with the principles of the Rio Declaration as well treaty practice, which applied the"polluter pays" principle.
Agreement was expressed with the approach of the Commission that article 1 should be separated into two provisions, as proposed by the Special Rapporteur: one on scope stricto sensu and the other on the purpose of the legal regime to be created.
General agreement was expressed with several of the concerns noted in the above paragraphs regarding binding third parties to contractual derogations from the draft instrument absent their express consent.
Agreement was expressed with the Commission's view that the genuine link rule expounded by the International Court of Justice in the Nottebohm case should not be interpreted as a general rule of international law applicable to all States.
General agreement was expressed by the Working Group regarding the desirability of dealing with transparency in investor-State arbitration, which differed from purely private arbitration, where confidentiality was an essential feature.
Agreement was expressed with the importance attributed by the Special Rapporteur to addressing the complex problem of delegating State functions to the private sector, with a question being raised as to whether it should be addressed under article 7, paragraph 2, or elsewhere.
General agreement was expressed regarding the desirability of dealing with transparency in treaty-based investor-State arbitration, which differed from purely private arbitration, where confidentiality was an essential feature.
While agreement was expressed with the view that each principal organ, including the Security Council, had the freedom to interpret the provisions of the Charter applicable to it, the view was expressed that the question of sanctions fell into the sphere of both the General Assembly and the Security Council.
Agreement was expressed with the view of the Special Rapporteur expressed in paragraph 43 of his second report, that the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in the Namibia case Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia(South West Africa) Notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276(1970), Advisory Opinion of 21 June 1971, I.C.J. Reports 1971, p. 16, at pp. 31-32, para. 53.