Примеры использования Another discussant на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Another discussant agreed, commenting that the same care should be given to the choice of non-permanent members of the Council.
In the realm of requirements for peacekeeping missions, it was the Secretariat that should become more transparent,asserted another discussant.
Another discussant responded that the Council was divided on some important issues; it was important to be candid about that.
The new website had proved to be an extremely useful tool,agreed another discussant, in part because it included the content and scope of mandates.
Similarly, another discussant expressed concern about the reliability of the sources of intelligence of listing requests.
Missions might be a helpful component of prevention and an indication of the Council's growing appreciation of its value,commented another discussant, but the terms of reference of the mission to Afghanistan had not been agreed upon in advance, as should be standard practice.
Another discussant stressed that it would be beneficial if the Council could make a better use of the work and expertise of the Peacebuilding Commission.
Although the situation in Haiti was still difficult,commented another discussant, the Council had at least demonstrated a capacity to adjust its posture and operations as conditions in Haiti evolved.
Another discussant suggested that, as an experiment, the Council members agree to hold consultations without prepared notes for a six-week period.
In order to avoid extensive repetitions,while increasing the interactivity of discussions, another discussant appealed to Council members to avoid repeating the same concepts whenever they agreed with what was said by a previous speaker.
Another discussant expressed great disappointment over the lack of strategic debate, as"strategic doesn't mean stratospheric.
Concurring that Council members should take into account the views of those most directly affected by the Council's efforts at conflict management, another discussant noted the political importance both of getting regional arrangements on board and of gaining a consensus among the five permanent members.
As another discussant put it, there did not need to be a revolution in working methods, as the Council was the master of its own procedures.
The legitimacy of the Council, noted another discussant, was derived largely from the respect that United Nations Members have for it.
Another discussant said that the lack of progress in the Middle East peace process had been the biggest disappointment over the last two years on the Council.
Referring to the huge increase in the Council's workload, another discussant noted that, when the Charter was drafted over 60 years ago, threats to international peace and security were generally viewed as conflicts between States.
Another discussant agreed that the Council was inconsistent, sometimes working with regional groups and sometimes ignoring them, depending on what was convenient.
Despite the fact that consensus is sometimes hard to achieve, another discussant asserted that the quest is worth it because of the message that unanimity sends on sensitive questions relating to sanctions and the development of norms.
Another discussant regretted that events in Libya had led the Security Council to generally react too weakly and slowly to the momentous developments of the Arab Spring.
Urging that missions be better planned by Council members, another discussant suggested that countries to be visited should be informed well in advance of the Council's intention to visit and that everything be done to ensure that all meetings with interlocutors take place as planned.
Another discussant pointed out, though, that sometimes the debates themselves had proved to have an impact, as, for instance, in the case of the topic of"Women and peace and security.
In Yemen, commented another discussant, the Council had been slow to back the diplomatic initiative of the Gulf Cooperation Council, but once it did, the situation had turned for the better.
Another discussant contrasted the"sedate atmosphere" in the Council with that of the European Union, where 27 member States manage to engage in lively debate on a range of issues.
One recent improvement,noted another discussant, had been the effort to streamline and rationalize the cycle for renewal of mandates, something that had first been proposed at the previous year's workshop.
Another discussant suggested that the newly elected Council members would be surprised how often Council members make statements in consultations that could have been made publicly.
This task was made that much more difficult, another discussant complained, when some Permanent Representatives at times step out of the Council chamber during sessions to engage with the press and then return to shape the outcome.
According to another discussant, even the members of the Security Council who had strong sanctions teams in their delegations depended on the work of panels of experts.
Another discussant said that members had been asked why they had failed to speak on a particular topic and that others became suspicious when members exercised restraint.
Another discussant acknowledged that considerable progress had been made, particularly concerning relations with the African Union, as illustrated by the effective collaboration on the Sudan and South Sudan.
Another discussant commented that too much of the Council's agenda was dictated by mandate renewals and reports of the Secretary-General, leading to ritualistic statements by the members.