Примеры использования Appointment of an arbitrator на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The decision concerns the application for the appointment of an arbitrator by the court.
It may be made also by the party which appointed or participated in the appointment of an arbitrator.
Notification of the appointment of an arbitrator referred to in article 9 or article 10.
The President held consultations with the parties with regard to the appointment of an arbitrator.
Anticipating on the appointment of an arbitrator by the parties should also be omitted.
Carrying out such appointment, a competent person(body)may use one of the following procedures for the appointment of an arbitrator.
Was not given proper notice of appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings; see arts. 3; 11.
CADER noted that the respondents had the opportunity to respond to the applicant's nomination andagree to it, or to agree to the appointment of an arbitrator prior to filing their response to the application.
This is because the appointment of an arbitrator is one of the most important elements of the arbitration procedure.
The applicant filed an application with CADER seeking the default appointment of an arbitrator in a dispute with the respondents.
The decision is about the appointment of an arbitrator by the state courts after the agreed appointment mechanism had failed.
Paragraph 2 referred to the circumstances where there will be a successful challenge to the appointment of an arbitrator, and generally on the basis of bias or lack of independence.
Unable to agree on the appointment of an arbitrator, the applicant requested-- pursuant to Article 11(4)-- that the court appoint a three-member arbitral tribunal.
If default procedure not provided for in appointment agreement and any party, party arbitrator, third party or institution,fails to perform its function as provided in the agreement regarding appointment of an arbitrator.
The party was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings;
The party has not been duly notified of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitration proceeding or has been unable to take part in the proceeding; owing to causes beyond its control;
Article V(1)(b) NYC provides that a court may refuse to recognize orenforce an award when a party is not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator, or is otherwise unable to present its case.
Was not given proper notice of appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings;(art. 36( 1)( a)( ii)) see art. 11.
Paragraph(2)(a)(ii) provides that an arbitral award may be set aside if the party making the application was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case.
The party that opposed the appointment of an arbitrator claimed that the arbitral agreement was void, since it permitted arbitrators to resolve legal questions through equity.
Ii The party making the application was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case; or.
To that end, paragraph 7 further recommends the appointment of an arbitrator of a nationality other than the nationalities of the parties see also below, paragraph 44.
If within thirty days after the receipt of a party's notification of the appointment of an arbitrator the other party has not notified the first party of the arbitrator he has appointed.
The appellant applied to the court in order to prevent appointment of an arbitrator in replacement of the initially appointed arbitrator, who had rendered an award which had been set aside.
Iii The party against whom the interim measure is invoked was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present its case[with respect to the interim measure];
However, the Court struck out the application for the appointment of an arbitrator as the application did not specify any particular dispute and was, therefore, an abuse of process.
If within 30 days after the receipt of a party's notification of the appointment of an arbitrator the other party has not notified the first party of the arbitrator it has appointed, the first party may request the appointing authority to appoint the second arbitrator. .
Reference was made to a working assumption that ODR was a process in three phases andthat draft article 7 did not involve the appointment of an arbitrator but rather was a phase akin to conciliation, and therefore, the neutral acting under draft article 7 could not be the same person as the one acting under draft article 8.
The paragraph covered an activity for which there was no time limit elsewhere in the Rules but which was made subject to one now-- the appointment of an arbitrator, together with other activities by the appointing authority which were subject to time limits elsewhere in the Rules and the question of the challenge, which for good reason was nowhere subject to time limits.