Примеры использования Author did not receive на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author did not receive a review of the transfer decision.
As a result, the requisite tests were not made and the author did not receive an effective diagnosis and treatment.
The author did not receive legal advice during the preliminary hearing.
During his whole detention at the military barracks, the author did not receive any medical treatment.
The author did not receive compensation from the United States government;
This clearly reflects confusion on the part of ASSEDIC since the author did not receive remuneration as manager of Riviera Communications.
The author did not receive a response from the Ombudsman on a written complaint on this latter matter.
Secondly, the Committee seems to conclude that the author did not receive"effective protection" as provided for under articles 17 and 2 para. 7.4.
The author did not receive a reply to his enquiries and learned that his appeal was dismissed on 15 March 1990.
The Dominican representative of the American Association of Jurists wrote a letter to this effect to President Balaguer;apparently, the author did not receive a reply.
Upon moving to Colombo, the author did not receive official accommodation nor did he receive any rent allowance.
With regard to the author's claim that the State party violated his rights under the Covenant by failing to investigate the complaints made by the author to the police in respect of death threats he had received, the Committee notes the State party's contention that the author did not receive any death threats and that no complaints or reports of such threats were received. .
However, the author did not receive any medication from the prison authorities; he purchased painkilling tablets himself.
With regard to the author's claim that the State party violated his rights under the Covenant by failing to investigate the complaints made by the author to the police in respect of death threats he had received, the Committee notes the State party's contention that the author did not receive any death threats and that no complaints or reports of such threats were received. .
The author did not receive a copy of the court's judgement until the time-limit for filing an appeal to the High Court had expired.
The Committee observes that the claim that the author did not receive an effective remedy although he failed to fulfil the conditions of legal representation is not linked to a claim of violation of any other right of the Convention.
The author did not receive any communication from the Supreme Council of Judicature on the reasons for his non-appointment.
The author did not receive a copy of the court's judgement until the time-limit for filing an appeal to the High Court had expired.
While the author did not receive unemployment benefits because he was deported immediately after his release, a substantial number of former prisoners benefited from the scheme.
Since the author did not receive any response by that date, he resubmitted his complaint to the Vice Chairman of the Supreme Court on 25 September 2006, and on 29 September 2006. On 15 September 2006, the author complained of ill-treatment to the Staropromyslovsk District Court of Grozny.
The author did not receive a response to his request for resignation but on 21 August 1998, received a letter from the Authority stating that he was being treated as having vacated his post on 1 June 1998, because he had not proceeded on the transfer directed in the letter of 23 April 1998.
This applies only to cases when the author doesn't receive equity directly from the company.
Following this decision, the authors did not receive the sums in question, as the German State refused to pay them and the Minister of Justice refused to authorize enforcement.
Since the authors did not receive a reply within the legislative deadline, on an unspecified date, they inquired with the Justice Department of the Gomel Regional Executive Committee as to the reasons for the delay. On 29 January 2004, the first author was informed that the application was directed to the Ministry of Justice for decision.
Since the authors did not receive a decision for another month, on an unspecified date, the first author filed a complaint to the Minister of Justice and the General Prosecutor of the Republic. On 12 March 2004, the Prosecutor's Office informed him that his complaint was directed to the Ministry of Justice. On 19 March 2004, the Ministry of Justice informed him that they could not issue a decision because of the absence of a Conclusion by the Republican Commission on the Registration of Public Associations.
The author claims that he did not receive a response to either his petition or his reminder of 8 March 1999.
The author argues that she did not receive any compensation for the demolished property only because of the discriminatory nature of the Czech law which requires Czech citizenship.
As to the fact that PDRCC submissions were not made, the author states that he did not receive the decision by mail and that he was not responsible for missing the statutory deadlines.
The SecretaryGeneral of Parliament confirmed in two letters to the author that he did not receive a response from the Ministry of Defence to his request. On 13 March 2000, the President accused the UNP of complicity with the LTTE in an interview published by the Far Eastern Economic Review.
The Committee notes that, despite its inquiry with the author, it did not receive any documentary evidence to support his claims.