Примеры использования Author had на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author had his original methods of writing.
What other works this author had read the student.
The author had access to workplace information in the same manner as other officers.
After the book was launched, the author had a meeting with his readers.
The author had the possibility of applying for judicial review of the Tribunal decision, but declined to do so.
Люди также переводят
It confirms that the author had access to legal advisers.
The author had access to various legal remedies and obtained substantive decisions in accordance with the law.
Next to diversification, the author had some other important tips as well.
The author had the opportunity to challenge these measures before the Ministry of Security and the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The claim was thus hypothetical and the author had insufficient status as a victim.
As a result, the author had no place to go for several days, until she found a place with her employer's help.
The High Court granted leave that same day and the author had his application heard in June 1995.
Accordingly, the author had ample opportunity to substantiate his claims.
That in no way affected the right to defence, since at all times the author had the opportunity to request and refute evidence.
In addition, the author had alternative judicial means at his disposal.
According to the State party,it later became clear that when taking the examination, the author had the status of civil servant State employee.
From the other hand, the author had to distant himself from those elite somehow.
The author also submits that the legal system did not understand the aboriginal way of solving disputes orthe particular spiritual connection that the author had with the land.
According to the State party, the author had three opportunities to exhaust domestic remedies.
The author had a right to appeal his detention in court and subsequently file a complaint in cassation; he chose not to do so.
The Ombudsman's Office declined to investigate because the author had alternative means of redress before the EOT.
In the present case, the author had access to duly reasoned, written judgements from the District Court and Court of Appeal.
This translator was called by the prosecution as a witness during the trial, during which the author had the opportunity to crossexamine him and also to test his knowledge and competency.
Consequently, the author had at his disposal opportunity to take the necessary steps in order to implement his passive electoral rights.
Whereas the defendant was not able to crossquestion her ophthalmologist, the author had the opportunity to crossquestion the expert proposed by the defendant.
The author had access to judicial review of the decision as evidenced by her appeal to the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal.
The EOT found it correct that at one stage the author had five projects assigned to him while his colleagues had two each.
The author had submitted an earlier communication which was declared inadmissible because of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies on 29 July 1992. CCPR/C/45/D/486/1993.
The subsequent investigation determined that the author had a minor abrasion to his knee, which did not need medical attention.
Thus, the author had around 12 years in total at the same grade by the time he was reassigned to his position by the Minister's decision of 12 February 2004.