Примеры использования Author is a victim на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Counsel claims that the author is a victim of violations of articles 7 and 10, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
Accordingly, the State party concluded that it cannot agree with the Committee's findings that the author is a victim of violation of article 19, paragraph 2, of the Covenant.
Counsel claims that the author is a victim of violations of articles 6(1) and(4), 7, 10(1), 14(1) and 26 of the Covenant.
Moreover, the compensation mechanism of 17 March 1964 exclusively benefits one particular population group(farmers),thus constituting discrimination of which the author is a victim.
Accordingly the Committee concludes that the author is a victim of a violation of article 26 of the Covenant.
The author is a victim in this particular case of the continuing confiscation of his property, based on discriminatory legislation that has impeded the exercise of his property rights without any objective, reasonable justification.
Therefore, the Committee concludes that the author is a victim of a violation of article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant.
Therefore, in the light of the limited scope of review applied by the Supreme Court in the author's case, the Committee concludes that the author is a victim of a violation of article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant.
The Human Rights Committee considers that the author is a victim of a violation of article 25, in conjunction with article 2 of the Covenant.
In a note verbale dated 14 October 2011 submitted after several reminders, the State party argues that the communication is not admissible on two grounds:the failure to substantiate that the author is a victim of a violation of article 15(1) of the Covenant; and the failure to exhaust domestic remedies.
Counsel also claims that the author is a victim of article 14, paragraph 3(g), because he was assaulted in the police station after his arrest.
The circumstances in the case,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross violations of human rights in Turkey and the fact that the author is a victim of torture, clearly show that his return to Turkey would expose him to a particular risk of being subjected to torture again.
Counsel submits that the author is a victim of a violation of articles 7 and 10, paragraph 1, because of ill-treatment by the police after his arrest.
While I concur with the Committee's finding that the author is a victim of a violation of article 26 of the Covenant, I wish to explain my reasons for such a conclusion.
Counsel argues that the author is a victim of a violation of article 10 of the Covenant, since he was kept in detention without treatment for over a year, although the treatment had been ordered by the Court.
The Human Rights Committee considers that the author is a victim of a violation of article 25, in conjunction with article 2 of the Covenant" annex X, sect. S, paras. 7.4, 7.5.
As to whether the author is a victim of discrimination, the State party concedes, as referred to in paragraph 6.3 above, that the author is actually and personally affected by the challenged provisions, and accepts the general proposition that legislation does affect public opinion.
Counsel also claims that the author is a victim of a violation of article 14, paragraph 3(d), of the Covenant, as he did not receive effective legal representation.
Concerning whether the author is a victim of prohibited discrimination, the State party concedes that sections 122 and 123 do have an actual effect on the author and his complaint does not, as affirmed by the Tasmanian authorities, constitute a challenge in abstracto to domestic laws.
Counsel claims that the author is a victim of violations of articles 9, paragraph 3, and 14, paragraph 3(c), as he was held in detention for an unreasonable time awaiting trial and was not tried without undue delay.
The State party disputes that the author is a victim in terms of article 2 of the Optional Protocol, as it is in fact hypothetical and purely speculative that the author will spend longer in prison as a result of having been sentenced before the Sentencing and Parole Acts of 2002 came into force.
Counsel further submits that the author is a victim of a violation of article 14, paragraphs 3(b) and(d), as the author was not even aware that a petition for special leave to appeal had been filed on his behalf; he was therefore not represented by a lawyer of his choice and was unable to communicate with his lawyer and hence unable to prepare his defence.
In the circumstances, the Committee finds that the facts before it do not sustain a finding that the author was a victim of a violation of article 10 of the Covenant.
The decision does not dispute that the author was a victim of domestic violence and that she unsuccessfully sought to obtain protection in Mexico.
The Committee notes that the State party does not dispute that the author was a victim of domestic violence in Mexico and had unsuccessfully sought the protection of the Mexican authorities.
The Committee notes that, provided each of the authors is a victim within the meaning of article 1 of the Optional Protocol, nothing precludes large numbers of persons from bringing a case under the Optional Protocol.
Provided each of the authors is a victim within the meaning of article 1 of the Optional Protocol, nothing precludes large numbers of persons from bringing a case under the Optional Protocol.
With regard to the claim that the author was a victim of unequal application of the law in violation of article 26, the Committee considers that this claim may raise issues on the merits.
In the circumstances and bearing in mind that the State party has not disputed the author's allegations,the Committee finds that the information before it sustains a finding that the author was a victim of a violation of articles 7 and 10, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
Under the circumstances, and in the absence of any counter-argument from the State party, the Committee finds that the author was a victim of multiple violations of article 7 of the Covenant, prohibiting torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.