Примеры использования Be compatible with the object на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Reservations that offend peremptory norms would not be compatible with the object and purpose of the Covenant.
That would be possible only if States participating in convention conferences did not leave the question of reservations and alternatives until the end, when time pressure would result either in no provision on reservations ora mere restatement of the rule that reservations must be compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
Any limitations should also be compatible with the object and purpose of the Covenant and must not be arbitrarily applied.
It states that:"Reservations that offend peremptory norms would not be compatible with the object and purpose of the Covenant.
It should therefore certainly be specified in the Guide that reservations which are"implicitly authorized" because they are not formally excluded by the treaty must be compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
Reservations that offend peremptory norms would not be compatible with the object and purpose of the Covenant". See above, footnote 86, para. 8.
That draft guideline made it clear that reservations which were"implicitly authorized", because they were not formally excluded by the treaty,must be compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
Those paragraphs reflect the view that reservations offending peremptory norms of international law would not be compatible with the object and purpose of the Covenant, nor may reservations be taken to Covenant provisions which represent customary international law.
This is why guideline 3.1.3 stipulates that reservations which are"implicitly authorized" because they are not formally excluded by the treaty must be compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
Since, under article 19(c) of the Vienna Conventions, reproduced in guideline 3.1,a reservation must be compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, and since other States are required, under article 20, to take a position on this compatibility, it must be possible for them to do so.
It was suggested that draft guideline 3.5 enunciate the requirement that interpretative declarations be compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
In principle, it was universally recognized that a reservation must be compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty in question.
Its function is important, nonetheless: it is to establish that, contrary to an erroneous but fairly widespread perception, a reservation is not invalid solely because it aims to preserve the integrity of specific rules of internal law- on the understanding that, as is the case of any reservation,those made with such an objective must be compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty to which they relate.
Under article 19 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which is reflected in article 51 of the[Convention on the Rights of the Child], a reservation, in order to be admissible under international law,has to be compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty concerned.
Under article 19 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties- which is reflected in article 51 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child- a reservation, in order to be admissible under international law,has to be compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty concerned.
According to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, reservations to multilateral treaties are allowed,providing that the reservation is compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty itself.
States should institute procedures to ensure that each andevery proposed reservation is compatible with the object and purpose of the Covenant.
There is no doubt that a reservation expressly prohibited by the treaty cannot be held to be valid on the pretext that it is compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty;
States should therefore retain the possibility of making reservations, so long as they were compatible with the object of the treaty.
A reservation expressly prohibited by a treaty could not be considered valid on the pretext that it was compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
If it does not do so, reservations are permitted provided that they are compatible with the objects and purposes of the treaty.
In accordance with article 19 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and principles of customary international law,reservations can therefore be made, as long as they are compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty in question.
In accordance with rules of customary international law that are reflected in article 19 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties,reservations can therefore be made, provided they are compatible with the object and purpose of the Optional Protocol.
Mr. Vaswani(Singapore), speaking in explanation of position after the adoption of the draft resolution,said that article 19 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties explicitly permitted reservations that were compatible with the object and purpose of the relevant treaty.
On the other hand, an objection to a reservation that was compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty should not prevent the application of the other provisions of the treaty between the two States.
If the Committee requested States parties to institute procedures to ensure that each reservation was compatible with the object and purpose of the Convention, it was to ensure that States parties were not casual about entering reservations.