Примеры использования Breakdown of civil order на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The breakdown of civil order in Kuwait or Iraq during that period; or.
Losses of property caused by Allied Coalition Forces'[xxviii] bombing and those resulting from the breakdown of civil order.
The breakdown of civil order due to the absence of legal authority following Iraq's withdrawal from Kuwait.
Further, subparagraph 6(d) explicitly envisages the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait or Iraq during the relevant period as a cause of damage.
An accident occurring on the first day of or on the days immediately following the invasion of Kuwait is found to be related to the"breakdown of civil order.
This will include any loss suffered as a result of, inter alia,"the breakdown of civil order in… Iraq during that period" i.e. 2 August 1990 to 2 March 1991.
Property losses- including losses of military assets,those caused by Allied Coalition Forces'/ bombing and those resulting from the breakdown of civil order.
This will include any loss suffered as a result of, inter alia,"the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait or Iraq during that period" i.e. 2 August 1990 to 2 March 1991.
Construction began on 29 April 1990, but it allegedly ceased after 2 August 1990 because of"military operations orthreat of military action and the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait.
The Panel notes additionally that losses arising as a result of the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait during Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait are also direct losses.
The Panel considers such losses to be compensable whether the looting was undertaken by Iraqi soldiers or agents, orby others as a result of the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait.
The Panel further notes that the actions resulting in the loss of the camp allegedly took place as a result of the breakdown of civil order in Iraq, which Bhandari stated was caused by the withdrawal of Iraqi forces from Kuwait.
Due to the breakdown of civil order and the widespread destruction of property at Kuwaiti airports and seaports, claimants faced practical difficulties in obtaining specific proof of the circumstances in which the goods were lost.
The Panel found that the Governing Council in its decision 7 has determined that losses arising out of the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait or Iraq during the period cited are“direct losses”.
The MOI contends that the Allied Coalition Forces encouraged civil unrest and rebellion in Iraq as part of their military strategy against Iraq andthat they undertook military operations that inevitably led to the breakdown of civil order in Iraq.
The Panel finds that the Governing Council in its decision has determined that losses arising out of the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait or Iraq during the period cited are"direct losses.
The"E2A" Panel has found in previous reports that due to the breakdown of civil order and the widespread destruction of property at Kuwaiti airports and seaports, claimants faced practical difficulties in obtaining specific proof of the circumstances in which goods were lost.
The Panel therefore finds the theft of the claimant's Valuation Items, whether by Iraqi soldiers or others,to be compensable as it is attributable to the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait during the jurisdictional period.
Recognizing that there were military operations and a breakdown of civil order in Kuwait during the period of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, paragraph 21 of Governing Council decision 7 provides the basis for a finding of direct loss in respect of claims for goods lost in transit in Kuwait.
As in the first instalment of AE4@ claims, the nature of damage alleged andthe location of all the properties in Kuwait established that the damage was a result of military operations and the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait during Iraq=s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Recognizing that there were military operations and a breakdown of civil order in Kuwait during the period of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, paragraph 21 of Governing Council decision 7 provides the basis for the Panel's analysis of the directness requirement in respect of claims for goods lost in transit in Kuwait.
As in the first instalment of“E4” claims, the nature of damage alleged andthe location of all the properties in Kuwait established that the damage was a result of military operations and the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait during the period of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Applying paragraph 21 of decision 7 to the claims at hand,the Panel finds that, due to the breakdown of civil order and the widespread destruction of property at Kuwaiti airports and seaports, claimants faced practical difficulties in obtaining specific proof of the circumstances in which the goods were lost.
The Panel notes that the direct link between the invasion and certain losses alleged in this instalment may also be established by reference to the events and circumstances described in paragraphs 21( d) and( e)of decision 7, namely, a breakdown of civil order and hostage-taking and other illegal detention. The provisions of paragraphs 21( d) and( e) are set out in note 6 above.
KNPC assumes that the cash was taken by invading Iraqi troops; but, in any event,it contends that the breakdown of civil order during the period of the Iraqi presence in Kuwait gave rise to the environment in which these thefts were made possible, and that the loss was thus a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The claims establish, in accordance with paragraph 21 of Governing Council decision 7, that the damage was a result of military operations in Kuwait, actions by officials, agents or employees of the Government of Iraq or its controlled entities during the period of Iraq's invasion andoccupation of Kuwait, in connection with the invasion or occupation and the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait during that period.
Given the military operations and breakdown of civil order in Kuwait during the period of Iraq's invasion and occupation, the Panel finds paragraph 21 of Governing Council decision 7, quoted in paragraph, provides an adequate basis for a finding of direct loss in respect of claims for goods lost in transit in Kuwait.
With respect to the issue of causation, Governing Council decision 7 provides that compensation is available with respect to any direct loss, damage, or injury to corporations and other entities as a result of Iraq's unlawful invasion and occupation of Kuwait. This will include any loss suffered as a result of, inter alia,"the breakdown of civil order in… Iraq during that period" i.e. 2 August 1990 to 2 March 1991.
Given that there were military operations and a breakdown of civil order in Kuwait during the period of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, the Panel finds that paragraph 21 of Governing Council decision 7, quoted in paragraph, provides an adequate basis for a finding of direct loss in respect of claims for goods lost in transit in Kuwait.
Also, as in the case of the first instalment of“E4” claims, the claims establish, in accordance with paragraph 21 of Governing Council decision 7, that the damage was a result of military operations in Kuwait, actions by officials, agents or employees of the Government of Iraq or its controlled entities during the period of Iraq's invasion andoccupation of Kuwait, in connection with the invasion or occupation and the breakdown of civil order in Kuwait during that period.