Примеры использования Categories of unilateral acts на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The rule of good faith is,without any doubt whatever, applicable to all categories of unilateral acts.
The opinion was expressed that certain categories of unilateral acts, such as promise, continued to give rise to problems and that the term used by the author State to qualify its conduct should not be taken into account.
The grounds for declaring the invalidity of an act of recognition should also be applicable to all those categories of unilateral acts.
The Special Rapporteur had usefully illustrated some of the distinctions between possible categories of unilateral acts of States which relied upon acts of other States for their efficacy.
The Government of Italy, replying to the questionnaire prepared by the Commission in 1999,stated that there are three categories of unilateral acts.
Rather, the topic should be conceived as compartmentalized in nature andas comprising various types or categories of unilateral acts which varied one from another in terms of their properties and characteristics.
The proposed subject of study, as set out in paragraphs 199 and 200, was extremely broad, even ifit omitted certain categories of unilateral acts.
Similarly, and directly related to the categories of unilateral acts and, specifically, to the place occupied by the principle of estoppel, the debates that have taken place in the International Law Commission are highly illustrative.
How far this subjective element can be taken andwhether or to what extent the same reasoning is applicable to other categories of unilateral acts remains unclear.
Lastly, he proposed that in addition to considering other categories of unilateral acts in order to establish their specific content, the Special Rapporteur should prepare new draft articles on the general characteristics common to all unilateral acts strictu senso.
The Government of the United Kingdom is not convinced that the provisions of the Vienna Convention can be applied mutatis mutandis to all categories of unilateral acts of States.
In approaching the topic,the Commission should first study all the categories of unilateral acts, beginning with promise and recognition; then identify the common points and differences between the various categories; and only then proceed to identify the general rules that would be applicable.
Moreover, he was not convinced that it would be necessary to divide the topic into general rules applicable to all unilateral acts andspecific rules applicable to individual categories of unilateral acts.
It was necessary to establish a clear framework that could facilitate the Commission's work by identifying the categories of unilateral acts which should be examined by the Commission and those that should not.
His delegation therefore supported the suggestion that a distinction should be drawn between general rules applicable to all unilateral acts andspecific rules applicable to individual categories of unilateral acts.
On the other hand, owing to the multitude of categories of unilateral acts and the different legal issues which they raise respectively, it seems neither feasible norparticularly helpful to address each question contained in the questionnaire in relation to each category of unilateral act.
Austria is not convinced that the provisions of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties can automatically be applied mutatis mutandis to all categories of unilateral acts of States.
With regard to the distinction between general rules that could be applicable to all unilateral acts andspecific rules applicable to individual categories of unilateral acts, he believed that one of the aims of the Commission's work was to extract general principles from the available material.
One representative indicated that it would be appropriate for the Commission at first to formulate rules common to all unilateral acts andafterwards to focus on the consideration of specific rules for particular categories of unilateral acts.
Another view, expressing doubts on the necessity to divide the topic into general rules applicable to all unilateral acts andspecific rules applicable to individual categories of unilateral acts, felt that the only aspect of unilateral acts that seemed to call for specific rules concerned whether and how they could be revoked.
In conclusion, he saw no reason why the draft articles should not be structured around the distinction between general rules applicable to all unilateral acts andspecific rules applicable to specific categories of unilateral acts.
Although the examples cited were based on generally accepted categories of unilateral acts, the Special Rapporteur suggested that a new definition of unilateral acts could be formulated, taking as a basis the definition provisionally adopted at the fiftyfifth session and taking into account forms of State conduct producing legal effects similar to those of unilateral acts. .
Some delegations supported point(b), according to which the draft articles could be structured around a distinction between general rules which might be applicable to all unilateral acts andspecific rules applicable to individual categories of unilateral acts.
Mr. Klisović(Croatia), speaking on unilateral acts of States, said that,although simply transposing the rules of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties to all categories of unilateral acts would be inappropriate, the invalidity of unilateral acts was one area where the application of the Vienna rules mutatis mutandis was acceptable.
He also shared the view that certain categories of unilateral acts should be excluded from the study, namely unilateral political acts, unilateral acts of international organizations, unilateral acts of States which gave rise to international responsibility, and unilateral acts falling within the scope of the law of treaties.
In the view of other members of the Commission, it would be appropriate to divide the draft articles into two parts: the first would establish general provisions applicable to all unilateral acts and the second,provisions applicable to specific categories of unilateral acts which, owing to their distinctive character, could not be regulated in a uniform way.
With regard to the first of these tasks,the Special Rapporteur drew attention to the fact that he had singled out certain categories of unilateral acts for exclusion from the study, namely, unilateral political acts, unilateral legal acts of international organizations and those attitudes, acts and conduct of States which, though voluntary, were not performed with the intention of producing specific effects in international law.
Mr. Hilger(Germany) said, in relation to unilateral acts of States, that it was reasonable to limit the scope of the topic from the outset so that the analysis would be more thorough and could progress more rapidly;it would also be desirable to distinguish among various types or categories of unilateral acts and to focus on statements directed towards other States.
The Commission should include that category of unilateral acts in its agenda and consider it very carefully, for it was a subjectof great concern to some countries.
Secondly, they welcomed the suggestion that the draft should be structured around a distinction between general rules, applicable to all unilateral acts, andspecific rules applicable to individual categories of unilateral act.