Примеры использования Chamber granted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Trial Chamber granted the request.
This intention was confirmed in their notices filed before the Appeals Chamber on 9 April 2002.On 16 May 2002, the Appeals Chamber granted Kordić and Čerkez access to certain materials.
The Trial Chamber granted the request.
In response to Tolimir's request for an adjournment of approximately six weeks in order for him to review these newly admitted documents, the Chamber granted him a three-week adjournment.
On 15 February 2000, the Trial Chamber granted Vuković's motion for joinder.
The Chamber granted the prosecution motion, and the defence requested certification to appeal the decision.
At the beginning of the case, the Trial Chamber granted the prosecution 175 hours in which to present 82 witnesses.
The Chamber granted several motions permitting the prosecution to drop 18 witnesses from its original list of trial witnesses, thereby shortening the proceedings.
Upon application from the Prosecutor,the Appeals Chamber granted a request to review its dismissal of the indictment pursuant to rule 120.
The Trial Chamber granted the accused three months to prepare his defence, taking into account the fact that he is representing himself and the large volume of material he must review.
Owing to the magnitude of the new material, the Trial Chamber granted the prosecution until 16 July 2010 to file a motion in relation to the notebooks.
The Chamber granted the Prosecution motion, and the Defence requested certification to appeal this decision, which was granted by the Trial Chamber in late April 2010 and which is pending before the Appeals Chamber. .
The trial is scheduled in May 2009.On 15 April 2009, the Chamber granted a Defence motion to certify the appeal of a decision denying the vacation of the trial date.
The case is assigned to Trial Chamber III and Judge Robinson is the pre-trial Judge.On 9 June 2005, the Trial Chamber granted the accused's motion for provisional release.
The Trial Chamber granted the motion and ordered the immediate release of Nenad Banović.
During the presentation of evidence on behalf of both the prosecution and the defence,the Trial Chamber granted requests for protective measures, including face distortion and the use of a pseudonym, for 28 witnesses.
The Trial Chamber granted the motion and ordered a joint trial for all six accused.
The proceedings against her have been formally stayed, but she is under a regime of judicial supervision.On 6 March 2014, the Chamber granted a request from her guardian to be allowed to transport her to Thailand for medical treatment.
On 6 June 2012, the Trial Chamber granted Stanišić provisional release for three months, which was extended upon his request on 27 August 2012.
Partly in view of the larger than expected volume of evidence presented by the prosecution,whose last witness testified in May 2012, the Chamber granted Karadžić more time than expected to prepare for his defence case.
On 5 October 1999, the Trial Chamber granted the Prosecutor's motion for joint trial of the same six accused.
On 13 December 2012, the Chamber issued a decision on the temporary suspension of proceedings, in which it decided to suspend hearings until 4 March 2013 to give the accused sufficient time for the effective preparation of his defence.On 6 February 2013, the Chamber granted the defence's request to lift the temporary suspension of proceedings.
For these applications, the Trial Chamber granted 2,083 victims participatory status, bringing the total number to 4,107.
Under Article 21(2) of the Headquarters Agreement Between the International Tribunal and The Netherlands, the International Tribunal is obligated to"cooperate at all times with the competent authorities" of the HostState in order"to facilitate the proper administration of justice." On 16 March 2006, the Trial Chamber granted the Dutch authorities and Judge Parker full access to the Milošević case file.
The Trial Chamber granted shorter breaks to accommodate the defence team, which still calls for extended time to prepare.
The decision directs Mr. Ruto to sign a waiver in respect of his right to be present during trial and sets out a list of stages during which he is required to be present.On 18 July 2013, the Chamber granted the Prosecution's request for leave to appeal the decision. The Prosecutor filed a document in support of the appeal against this decision on 29 July 2013.
In November 2010, the Chamber granted a Prosecution motion to add to its exhibit list the notebooks of Ratko Mladić and other relevant materials.
Although the Defence requested more time for the presentation of their cases, the Chamber granted them 210 hours in total, meaning that the conclusion of the Defence's presentation of evidence would occur in mid-2010.
The Trial Chamber granted the request in part, excluding those facts that were too broad, too tendentious, not sufficiently significant, or not sufficiently relevant to the case.
At the pre-defence conference on 12 May 2014, the Trial Chamber granted the defence 207.5 hours to present its evidence, the same amount of time that had been granted to the prosecution.