Примеры использования Chanet agreed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Ms. CHANET agreed with that view.
Ms. Chanet agreed with Sir Nigel Rodley's proposal.
Miss CHANET agreed that the question should be deleted.
Mrs. CHANET agreed that the wording could be clearer.
Ms. CHANET agreed that the verb"rejected" was too strong.
Ms. Chanet agreed with Mr. Rivas Posada that the paragraph needed to be expanded.
Mrs. CHANET agreed that such a change would recognize the presumption of innocence.
Ms. Chanet agreed with Mr. Lallah and supported his non-theoretical approach to the recommendations.
Ms. CHANET agreed since article 14 could not apply"as such" to expulsion proceedings.
Ms. Chanet agreed that the link with article 20 might be questionable under some circumstances.
Ms. Chanet agreed, pointing out that paragraph 13 referred to two distinct rights, one negative and one positive.
Ms. Chanet agreed, adding that there would be a vast array of interpretations of the term"state secret" among the States parties.
Ms. Chanet agreed that ongoing press briefings would be useful and should be used to generate press interest in the Committee's work.
Ms. CHANET agreed with Mr. Lallah that the thrust of the text had been lost in the efforts to incorporate the necessary changes and the views of all interested parties.
Ms. Chanet agreed that protection should not be limited to minorities covered by article 27, but more because all minorities should have access to the media.
Ms. Chanet agreed that the guidelines could not be integrated into the rules of procedure, given that some of their provisions concerned States and not the Committee members.
Ms. CHANET agreed that the fact that certain derogations prohibited under article 4.2 were also recognized as peremptory norms under other instruments was immaterial.
Ms. Chanet agreed that the Committee could not lawfully meet if any member was unable to travel owing to a lack of resources on the part of the Organization.
Ms. Chanet agreed with Mr. Thelin that setting out detailed instructions on how to achieve such independence was too restrictive and could have the opposite effect.
Ms. CHANET agreed that all branches of government had a responsibility to implement the provisions of the Covenant but had some misgivings about the language used in the sentence in question.
Ms. CHANET agreed that the second sentence was presumptuous, and proposed replacing it with the following:"The General Comment establishes guiding principles for States which declare a state of emergency.
Ms. CHANET agreed, and observed that, in her opinion, it was completely illusory to make such a request since States parties which provided an addendum to update their reports did so at the very last minute.
Ms. CHANET agreed with many States parties that while the Committee and the Human Rights Council were distinct bodies with different rules of procedure and methods of work, they were complementary.
Ms. Chanet agreed with Ms. Majodina that it should not be assumed that all States licensed the media; the text should also take into account situations where the media were self-regulating and the authorities did not interfere.
Ms. Chanet agreed with Ms. Wedgwood that the problem with the working group's report was that it was being circulated as an official United Nations document, even though it did not reflect the position of all the members of the working group.
Ms. Chanet agreed with Mr. Amor and Mr. Lallah on the duration of the term, but said that it would be easier just to go by the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct, which were very detailed and could provide harmonized language.
Ms. CHANET agreed with Mr. Lallah that the paragraph was unnecessary; the Committee's competence to interpret the Covenant was fully justified, and it would be awkward to cite the Vienna Convention in connection with that point, as the Convention dealt with relations between States.
Ms. Chanet agreed with reordering the second and third sentences; the paragraph should address State control of the media before dominance in the public sector, since State control was the major problem in the majority of States parties to the Covenant.
Ms. CHANET, agreeing on the usefulness of a reference to the preamble to the Covenant, endorsed Mr. Scheinin's suggestion that it should be used as an additional argument.
Mrs. CHANET, agreeing with Mr. Buergenthal, said that the Ukraine delegation should not be given the opportunity to invoke the circumstances of the transitional period as an excuse for any shortcomings in the human rights situation.