Примеры использования Committee could discuss на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Mr. DIACONU agreed that the Committee could discuss religious freedom only in the context of racial discrimination.
The Secretary-General should submit an updated report on that issue so that the Committee could discuss it in detail.
In general, the Committee could discuss the ways in which its interpretations of the specific meaning and intent of the text had evolved.
The Bureau and the secretariat would try to identify a time when the Committee could discuss the issue before the end of the session.
The Committee could discuss the annual report during its annual session and, in accordance with its mandate, whilst recognizing the autonomy of the MEAs, could provide policy direction for the ECE region;
A more interactive process should be introduced,so that members of the Committee could discuss proposals rather than make formal statements.
The Committee could discuss with the secretariat whether that would be useful in relation to work that was behind schedule, drawing up the programme of work or other necessary activities.
He requested more information on the kinds of problems the Government was encountering so that the Committee could discuss ways of solving them with the delegation.
During the second week of the session, the Committee could discuss the concluding observations concerning those States whose reports had been considered during the first week, and so forth.
If the Secretariat did not have the necessary resources to complete its work outside of the meeting, perhaps the Committee could discuss the matter with the Secretary-General.
Once the priorities were established, the Committee could discuss them and disseminate them through its delegates to help donor countries identify activities that they whished to support.
Mr. SØRENSEN said that,if the mild wording of the draft general comment failed to produce the desired effect, the Committee could discuss further strategy at a later session.
Mr. HANSON(Canada) suggested that the Fifth Committee could discuss the political implications of certain issues while awaiting the technical advice of the Advisory Committee thereon.
In view of the complexities and difficulties in implementing the Declaration,further time would be needed before the Committee could discuss practical measures for ensuring peace and stability in the Indian Ocean.
Later in the session, the Committee could discuss the question of modalities and deadlines for the submission of draft resolutions in general and members could take a collective decision on improvement of its work in that regard.
Mr. Elji(Syrian Arab Republic)requested a suspension of the meeting so that the members of the Committee could discuss the implications of adopting decisions and resolutions without interpretation.
Ideally, the Subcommittee and the Committee could discuss the situation in a given State party before the issue of the national preventive mechanism was raised during the dialogue between the Committee and the delegation.
Mr. Rivas Posada(Special Rapporteur for Follow-up on Concluding Observations) said that, in order to improve such reports in future,it would be helpful if the Committee could discuss the criteria that should be applied in order to conclude that replies were fully satisfactory, not merely complete, and that no further follow-up action was needed.
It was also suggested that the Committee could discuss practical ways of encouraging States to make the optional declaration under paragraph 2 of article 36 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice with regard to its compulsory jurisdiction.
Mr. Sial(Pakistan) said that he was pleased that the report of the Secretary-General containing quarterly reporting on the acceptance of type II gratis personnel wouldsoon be issued and asked the Chairman to include it in the programme of work for the first part of the resumed session so that the Committee could discuss certain core functions of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations in preparation for the second part of the resumed session.
On that basis, the Committee can discuss the modalities of taking a decision on this issue at the COP 1 in accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 23 of the Convention.
The Fifth Committee and the Advisory Committee could then discuss the proposals on results-based budgeting at the fifty-fourth session.
The Committee could also discuss the need for capacity-building with a view to improving the dissemination of international law.
The Sixth Committee could subsequently discuss the topic further in the light of the work done by the Commission.
The Committee could then discuss the working paper at a later meeting, to which the Permanent Representative of Bosnia and Herzegovina could be invited.
The Drafting Committee could, however, discuss whether some other formulation was to be preferred.
In the light of the comments received, the Committee could then discuss practical measures to strengthen the Court, with full respect for its authority and independence.
Given that a letter had been received from the Permanent Mission,however, Committee members could discuss amendments to the provisional conclusions and then decide whether to adopt those conclusions.
The third preparatory committee could also discuss issues within the clusters and receive tabled proposals, but would also make an effort to elaborate consensus recommendations or identify priority issues that the preparatory committee recommends be addressed at the Review Conference.
The Committee could also discuss the reinforcement of international law through, inter alia, enhancement of the law-making process of the General Assembly so as to ensure wider participation of Member States in the codification and progressive development of international law and consensus on issues of common concern.