Примеры использования Committee could then на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee could then consider it paragraph by paragraph.
If the information requested was not provided, the Committee could then express its concern.
The Committee could then take any further action that might be necessary.
The Bureau could have recommended a programme of work, which the Committee could then have adopted if it so wished.
The committee could then turn to the issues outlined in paragraph 5.
Once the State party had provided that information, the Committee could then recommend that it recognize the Berbers as a minority.
The Committee could then set the date of submission of the next report accordingly.
Depending on what emerged from that meeting, the Committee could then decide whether it was worth continuing its discussion of that item.
The Committee could then consider and approve the draft, without discussing the case itself at that stage.
The working group could report to the Sixth Committee in 2014 on the results, and the Committee could then decide whether a more permanent structure could be established on that basis.
The Committee could then consider adopting the procedure for all States if it proved effective.
In the period between that notification and the next(a second notification being required under article 5 of the Convention),the Interim Chemical Review Committee could then consider how to proceed.
The Committee could then enquire, during the consideration of the next report, whether the amendment had in fact been adopted.
He sought clarification as to whether ACABQ could issue its reports on the 12 peace-keeping operations andthe United Nations Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia by 15 March 1994 so that the Committee could then consider those items.
The Committee could then ask additional questions if the answers were not satisfactory, or if new issues had arisen in the intervening time.
If, on the other hand, there was some basis for believing the Commission could make progress without direction from the Sixth Committee, it should be allowed to do so, and the Committee could then decide whether it made sense to establish a working group.
The committee could then decide to frame three or four verification scenarios to which it could request the working group to respond.
He proposed that in cases where written replies were received in advance, even in a language with which not many Committee members were familiar,States parties should be invited to limit their opening statement to 15 minutes so that the Committee could then begin the first round of questions.
The Committee could then use the evidence from the studies to make recommendations and provide advice to governmental authorities.
Those institutions could provide the Committee with first-hand information on possible deficiencies in the way States parties met their Covenant obligations; the Committee could then publicize that information so as to encourage the States concerned to bring their situations into line with their obligations.
The bureau of each Committee could then deal more effectively with its work, ensuring respect for the principle of equitable geographical distribution.
In the light of the comments received, the Committee could then discuss practical measures to strengthen the Court, with full respect for its authority and independence.
The Committee could then take the matter up again at its next session in October, and its concerns could be expressed at the Inter-Committee Meeting in December.
If several reminders went unanswered, the Committee could then choose to examine the situation in the country concerned and adopt concluding observations in the absence of a report.
The Committee could then discuss the working paper at a later meeting, to which the Permanent Representative of Bosnia and Herzegovina could be invited.
It might ask them also to annex their Education for All plans to their periodic reports; the Committee could then discuss the plans with reference to articles 13 and 14 of the Covenant and its general comments no. 11(1999) and No. 13(1999) on the right to education art. 13 of the Covenant.
The Committee could then also take a decision stating that it wished to send a mission to the State party and expected a response from the State party in that regard.
Updated reports from the Security Council and the Advisory Committee could then be taken up in June 1995 and it would be possible to have detailed proposals on the full deployment of the Mission since that was the date on which the Secretary-General hoped to begin the transitional period.
The Sixth Committee could then offer legal advice on the matter, but that should occur only after the Fifth Committee had completed its deliberations.
The Committee could then analyse the implications of granting observer status to the Council of Presidents of the General Assembly and consider other forms of representation for it.