Примеры использования Conference on disarmament could на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Conference on Disarmament could and should be in better shape.
If, however, no agreement is reached, the Conference on Disarmament could turn its attention elsewhere.
The Conference on Disarmament could benefit significantly from the expertise of COPUOS on issues relating to outer space and space technology.
We are afraid of the fact that a continuing climate of confrontation and mistrust within the Conference on Disarmament could finally lead to the loss of its ability.
In this context, the Conference on Disarmament could contribute to attaining our common goal.
However, in spite of many attempts, it has not been possible to overcome the 11-year-long stalemate so that the Conference on Disarmament could fulfil its primary task.
It remains the case that the Conference on Disarmament could and should do a good deal more.
It remains the case, however, that the continuing uncertainties which characterize our security mean that we cannot accept a commitment to a deadline for the elimination of nuclear weapons, nordo we believe that the Conference on Disarmament could usefully address these issues.
Another new focus for the Conference on Disarmament could, in our view, be the topic of missile nonproliferation.
They strongly supported all efforts to increase the effectiveness of the existing disarmament and arms control machinery, andhoped that negotiations on the fissile material cut-off treaty would soon begin and that the Conference on Disarmament could resume its work.
We proceed from the view that the Conference on Disarmament could also make use of the extensive expertise of IAEA in this area.
The Conference on Disarmament could benefit from consideration of the issue, possibly through a special coordinator appointed by the Conference for the purpose.
We also believe that our possibilities for addressing some of the current security concerns would be greatly advanced if the Conference on Disarmament could establish subsidiary bodies to deal with nuclear disarmament and with the prevention of an arms race in outer space.
We remain convinced that the Conference on Disarmament could play an important role, and we believe equally that it is high time that we cut through the Gordian knot with which it has been bound.
Of the delegations that expressed their views, a number urged the participants in the negotiations to support, without reopening,the draft presented by the Chairman so that the Conference on Disarmament could take a decision to approve the draft treaty so that it could be sent to the United Nations General Assembly for endorsement and opened for signature.
We are convinced that the Conference on Disarmament could contribute to fighting international terrorism by adopting a balanced programme of work without delay. This would enable us, inter alia, to begin negotiations on the FMCT.
The significance of a CTBT as an important contribution to ongoing non-proliferation efforts would only be enhanced if the Conference on Disarmament could succeed in negotiating a treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
The Conference on Disarmament could make quick progress and advance the nuclear disarmament agenda by concluding legally binding and effective international arrangements to assure non-nuclear-weapon States against the use or the threat of use of nuclear weapons.
In accordance with item IX of its established agenda- the so-called dialogue- andwithout prejudice to its negotiating role in all areas of its agenda, the Conference on Disarmament could identify and develop confidence-building measures in relation to agreements on disarmament and arms limitation under negotiation in the Conference. .
Perhaps the Conference on Disarmament could, as a start, prepare a model regional instrument on the limitation of conventional weapons, based on the experience of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, which is expected to be modernized on the basis of the decision taken in July this year by the OSCE.
We believe that the expansion of the Conference on Disarmament could be part of the solution, rather than of the problem.
Some weeks ago, there had been high expectations that the Conference on Disarmament could reach agreement on a programme of work, which would have allowed the international community finally to commence negotiations on a treaty banning the production of fissile materials for weapons purposes.
As the sole multilateral disarmament negotiating body, the Conference on Disarmament could play a critical role in negotiating global measures on specific conventional weapons and weapons systems.
Therefore they averred that the Conference on Disarmament could carry out its mandate by taking into account all the approaches that promote this goal.
We believe that the two ad hoc committees established in the Conference on Disarmament could be instrumental in increasing the security assurances for non-nuclear-weapon States and in banning the production of fissile material for nuclear-explosive devices.
Without diverting attention from the core issues of its agenda, the Conference on Disarmament could start pondering what kind of international agreement could be formulated once the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons reaches its final stage in 2005.
Kazakhstan is firmly convinced that the Conference on Disarmament can and must prove its efficiency.
My country considers that the Conference on Disarmament can play a complementary role.
I hope the Conference on Disarmament can make significant progress under strong leadership.
The Conference on Disarmament can legitimately be proud of what it has already accomplished.