Примеры использования Control over territory на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
AQAP has lost control over territory seized in 2012, including several major towns.
Hekmatyar's military activities are designed to gain exclusive control over territory.
The control over territory Russia acquired again after the war with Ottoman Empire in 1735-1739.
Mutual acceptance by Governments andde facto authorities of papers where control over territory is divided.
Similarly, control over territory did not imply total control over individuals.
Люди также переводят
Some delegations expressed concern about the use of the words"any authority exercising actual control over territory.
Furthermore, armed groups without effective control over territory have been held to have committed human rights violations.
In this respect, it should be taken into account that control over individuals did not mean that there was total control over territory.
Control over territory has proven to be the key factor enabling armed groups in the Democratic Republic of the Congo to profit from the exploitation of natural resources.
This war entrenched hostilities between the Spanish and French,as they would continue to vie for control over territory and influence throughout the world.
During the reporting period,CPJP extended its military control over territory in the north-east, including in the Bamingui-Bangoran and Vakaga regions southwards to the Haute Kotto region.
At the other extreme, some armed groups will operate only sporadically, or in an entirely clandestine manner, andexercise no direct control over territory.
Drones enable a State to perform targeted killing without exercising effective control over territory and without having the individual in custody.
That reference needed also to cover conflicts in which only organized armed groups were engaged,regardless of whether they exercised control over territory.
This may be both appropriate andfeasible where the group exercises significant control over territory and population and has an identifiable political structure which is often not the case for classic"terrorist groups.
As a consequence, warring factions seek to maintain or expand their control over territory and its inhabitants, often forcing them to work in slave-like conditions in the extraction of natural resources see S/2003/1027 and S/2002/537.
The degree of organization of these armed groups, their size, sophistication, andthe extent to which they exercise actual control over territory and population vary from one situation to the next.
States Parties andany authority exercising actual control over territory in which a United Nations operation is conducted shall respect the exclusively international character of the responsibilities of United Nations personnel.
It is especially appropriate andfeasible to call for an armed group to respect human rights norms when it"exercises significant control over territory and population and has an identifiable political structure.
In addition, non-State armed groups that exercise effective control over territory, such as ISIL, are increasingly considered to be bound by international human rights obligations in relation to all people within that territory. .
This applies mutatis mutandis to factions in a civil war which have agreed to the role and presence of the United Nations andhave de facto control over territory where United Nations peacekeepers are deployed.
The Central African Republic exemplifies the explosive mix of different groups vying for control over territory using violence: forces who had themselves been guerrillas before securing power; loosely organized armed groups; self-defense groups and criminal gangs.
The Special Rapporteur recognizes that parties to conflict may be reluctant to conclude such agreements for fear of legitimizing the other party ordue to concerns that they may concede control over territory or governmental functions.
However, it is clear that, even with the establishment of an all-inclusive government,exercising effective control over territory and natural resources would require time and would be possible only within the context of a broader framework of sound institution-building.
Non-State armed groups are also bound by the expectation of the international community that they will respect norms contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,especially where they exercise control over territory A/HRC/2/7, para. 19, and E/CN.4/2006/53/Add.5, paras. 25-26.
Similarly, fact-finding commissions have concluded that armed groups that are stable, organized, andhave effective control over territory have legal personality regarding a defined range of international humanitarian law and human rights obligations see A/HRC/19/69, paras. 106-107, and A/HRC/17/44.
Where control over territory is divided, national and de facto authorities should cooperate pragmatically(e.g. through humanitarian actors or other impartial intermediaries) to allow for family reunification despite obstacles such as closed boundary lines.
Furthermore, although non-State actors cannot become parties to the Convention, the Committee noted that,under certain circumstances, in particular where an armed group with an identifiable political structure exercised significant control over territory and population, non-State actors were obliged to respect international human rights.
The workshop agreed that those non-State actors which exercise effective control over territory, people and resources have a clear obligation to desist from actions which provoke forced population displacement, to protect those populations which have been displaced and to facilitate the return and reintegration of the internally displaced in their own communities.