Примеры использования Court could exercise на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Court could exercise that function provided that the Charter and Statute were amended accordingly.
Since the principle of sovereignty was inviolable,the situations in which the Court could exercise its jurisdiction had to be clearly identified.
On the one hand, article 11,paragraph 2, provided that the Court could exercise its jurisdiction only with respect to crimes committed after the entry into force of the Statute for that State, unless that State had declared its acceptance of the Court's jurisdiction.
It had also been noted that if the States concerned were not party to the Statute, the Court could exercise jurisdiction with their consent.
In that connection, article 6 should be amended so that the Court could exercise jurisdiction if a situation was referred to the Prosecutor by the Security Council or by the General Assembly.
We also commend the inclusion of a definition of the crime of aggression and the conditions under which the Court could exercise jurisdiction with respect to that crime.
His Government also appreciated that the Court could exercise its jurisdiction only where the national jurisdiction could not or was unwilling to try the crimes referred to in article 17 of the Statute, and was convinced of the existence of guarantees to protect legitimate State interests.
It was regrettable that the Statute included generalexpressions concerning the crime of aggression, and that it would be many years before the Court could exercise its jurisdiction in that field.
The former seems to be the correct interpretation otherwise the court could exercise powers on the territory of a non-State party without its consent.
Ireland would find it difficult to accept an“opt-in/opt-out” approach in relation to those crimes, given their serious nature, ora regime under which State consent was required before the Court could exercise its jurisdiction.
As to the role of the Security Council,he supported the proposal by the Syrian Arab Republic that the Court could exercise its jurisdiction if the Security Council decided that an act of aggression had been committed.
In addition to reviewing articles 8 and 124,the Conference amended the Rome Statute to include a definition of the crime of aggression and the conditions under which the Court could exercise jurisdiction over that crime.
With regard to the States that had to be parties to the Statute orto have accepted jurisdiction before the Court could exercise jurisdiction, his delegation supported option 1 for article 7, and article 7 ter regarding acceptance by non-parties.
Furthermore, the Preparatory Commission was to prepare proposals for submission to the Review Conference on the definition andElements of Crimes of aggression and the conditions under which the Court could exercise its jurisdiction with regard to that crime.
On the other hand, she notes that the State party underlined that,pursuant to article 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code, a court could exercise judicial control over the lawfulness of the apprehension or detention on remand, in conformity with article 9, paragraph 4, of the Covenant.
The main outcome of the Conference was the adoption of amendments to the Rome Statute that sought to define the crime of aggression andestablish conditions under which the Court could exercise jurisdiction with respect to that crime.
With regard to article 21, 1(b),Belarus would have preferred to retain the provisions of article 24 of the 1993 draft statute, under which the court could exercise its jurisdiction if it was accepted by the State which had custody of the accused in the case of a given crime, apart from the exceptions indicated in draft article 23.
Furthermore, the crime of aggression has been included in the Rome Statute butthe ICC cannot currently exercise jurisdiction over this crime because there has been no agreement so far on a defi nition of aggression and the conditions under which the Court could exercise its jurisdiction.
As to exercise of jurisdiction, the third stage, under article 6(a)taken in conjunction with article 11, the Court could exercise jurisdiction if a situation was referred to it by a State party.
The Commission agreed that any explanatory material to article 17 undecies should clarify that the court could exercise jurisdiction on arbitration matters, whether the place of arbitration is located in the enacting State or in another State and that the provision should not be construed as expanding the territorial jurisdiction of courts. .
The Conference amended the Rome Statute to include a definition of the crime of aggression and the conditions under which the Court could exercise jurisdiction with respect to that crime see resolution RC/Res.6.
Another representative said that he would have preferred to retain the provisions of article 24 of the 1993 draft statute, under which the court could exercise its jurisdiction if it was accepted by the State having jurisdiction under the relevant treaty, apart from the exceptions indicated in article 23 of the same draft concerning acceptance by States of the Court's jurisdiction.
The first Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, held in Kampala from 31 May to 11 June, has been hailed as a historic event,as it provided an opportunity to introduce amendments to the Rome Statute to include a definition of the crime of aggression and the conditions under which the Court could exercise jurisdiction with respect to that crime.
With regard to paragraph 2 of article 23,some delegations felt that requiring a prior determination by the Security Council that an act of aggression had been committed by a State before the court could exercise its jurisdiction with respect to individual criminal responsibility for that act was consistent with the role of the Security Council under the Charter and the role of the court under the statute.
The first-ever Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the ICC,which took place in Kampala from 31 May to 11 June 2010, can be seen as a critical milestone in the evolution of international criminal justice, as it amended the Rome Statute to include a definition of the crime of aggression and the conditions under which the Court could exercise jurisdiction with respect to that crime.
Furthermore, to give the Court inherent jurisdiction would favour a State that was not a party to the Statute, because in their case the consent of the custodial State or the territorial State orboth would be required before the Court could exercise its jurisdiction, whereas in the case of States parties the Court would automatically exercise jurisdiction.
With regard to the Chairman's second question, his delegation considered that one or more of the four States listed in option 1 for article 7 should be a party to the Statute before the Court could exercise its jurisdiction by way of the complementarity mechanism envisaged in article 15.
Its courts could exercise universal jurisdiction over the crime of genocide and other crimes, such as torture, which Brazil had a treaty obligation to suppress.
Its courts could exercise universal jurisdiction over the crime of genocide and the crimes, such as torture, which Brazil had a treaty obligation to suppress.
Its courts could exercise universal jurisdiction over the crime of genocide and other crimes, such as torture, which Brazil had a treaty obligation to suppress.