Примеры использования Current capacity to pay на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Current capacity to pay was best assessed from the most recent accurate data available.
They consider the statistics inflated and unrepresentative of Moldova's current capacity to pay.
The current methodology was broadly consistent with the need to reflect current capacity to pay and to mitigate short-term fluctuations in GNI, and there was no effective alternative to that approach.
In addition, it considered even the assessment rate proposed for 1997 as not fully reflecting its own current capacity to pay.
Further discussion was, however,needed to determine a base period that would reflect current capacity to pay while preserving stability and predictability in the scale.
Some members favouring a shorter base period considered that it would better reflect Member States' current capacity to pay.
It noted that it had no technical basis for judging Cambodia's current capacity to pay as recent economic indicators are not available, but rather had arrived at its conclusion on the basis of its understanding of Cambodia's special circumstances.
A three-year base period would best ensure the needed correlation between current capacity to pay and assessment rates.
In order for there to be better correlation between assessed contribution and current capacity to pay, the statistical base period should be reduced to three years, as recommended by the Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Working Group on the Implementation of the Principle of Capacity to Pay. .
Some members stated that a shorter,three-year base period would more closely approximate the current capacity to pay of Member States.
Some members believed that such recalculation would reflect current capacity to pay better, while others felt that it might lead to annual renegotiation of the scale, making annual assessments less stable and predictable, quite apart from contravening rule 160 of the rules of procedure.
Some members of the Committee stated their preference for the three-year base period as proposed by the Working Group,on the grounds that it better reflected current capacity to pay.
His delegation could see no viable alternativeto the current methodology, which in general accurately reflected current capacity to pay and damped out short-term fluctuations in gross national income.
We recognize the need to adjust the existing peacekeeping scale of assessments, which is based on the 1973 system, in the light of changed circumstances,including countries' current capacity to pay.
The discussion of the statistical base period had once again centred on the conflicting interests of stability(long base periods) and current capacity to pay(short base periods), and a gradual reduction in the length of the base period had been suggested.
Annual automatic recalculation of the scale was needed to eliminate excessive fluctuations andto ensure that contributions reflected current capacity to pay.
Views had differed on the length of the base period: a shorter period would use only the most recent income data andtherefore reflect more closely current capacity to pay; a longer period would smooth out year-to-year fluctuations in income and secure greater stability between scales, as well as ensuring the use of more reliable data.
Third, Ukraine supported the conclusion of the Committee on Contributions that the current length of the statistical base period was indicative of the past rather than current capacity to pay of Member States.
Lastly, any new arrangement for the apportionment of the Organization's expenses should reflect an accurate determination of each Member State's current capacity to pay and should enable the Organization to function without financial difficulties.
With reference to rule 160 of the rules of procedure, the Slovak Republic as one of the two successor States of the former Czech andSlovak Federal Republic requests determination of its assessment rate on the basis of its current capacity to pay.
However, the changing world economic situation required the Organization to develop a methodology for the preparation of the scale of assessments that reflected each Member State's current capacity to pay in a more equitable manner, based on the most current, comprehensive and comparable data available.
He noted with satisfaction the concrete proposals put forward by the ad hoc Working Group recommending the reduction of the statistical baseperiod to three years, with possible annual recalculation to better reflect current capacity to pay.
A number of members considered that a single base period would be simpler and technically sounder,with some favouring a three-year base period, to correspond more closely to current capacity to pay, and others favouring a six-year period, to help to smooth out the impact of short-term fluctuations in GNI data.
Some members argued that a three-year base period would have the advantage of providing the most recent, andtherefore realistic, approximation of Member States' current capacity to pay.
Given the political, economic and social transformations taking place in allparts of the world, a 10-year period could not reflect the current capacity to pay of countries, especially new Member States.
Since the data available for 1985-1990 were inherited from the time when his country had had a centrally planned economy, they did not accurately reflect the existing economic realities at that time, or the present-day realities,or his country's current capacity to pay.
His delegation fully supported the conclusion of the Committee on Contributions that"a determination of assessment rates for the 22 Member States that better[reflected] their current capacity to pay could only be achieved in the context of a new scale of assessments.
Mr. SWETJA(Indonesia) said that, although his delegation sympathized with the concerns expressed by the 22 Member States, it fully concurred with the Committee's conclusion, as stated in paragraph 28 of its report,that"a determination of assessment rates for the 22 Member States that better reflect their current capacity to pay could only be achieved in the context of a new scale of assessments.
After lengthy discussion of the individual representations,the Committee concluded that a determination of assessment rates for the 22 Member States that better reflect their current capacity to pay could only be achieved in the context of a new scale of assessments.
The Committee on Contributions had recognized that the assessment rates of Ukraine and the other countries which had been part of the former Czechoslovakia, the former Soviet Union and the former Yugoslavia needed considerable adjustment andhad rightly concluded that the determination of assessment rates for those States that better reflected their current capacity to pay could only be achieved in the context of a new scale of assessments.