Примеры использования Definition of terrorism should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
That definition of terrorism should include the following elements.
The second objection is that peoples under foreign occupation have a right to resistance and a definition of terrorism should not override this right.
The definition of terrorism should distinguish clearly between heinous acts of terrorism and such legitimate struggles.
That subject matter, as we know, has been around the proverbial block many times,with differing views as to what the definition of terrorism should be.
Any definition of terrorism should establish a clear distinction between terrorism and armed struggle in self-defence or for self-determination.
CARICOM attached importance to ensuring respect for human rights andcivil liberties in all counter-terrorism action and emphasized that any definition of terrorism should acknowledge the legitimate struggle of peoples for self-determination.
The definition of terrorism should be a purely legal formulation; in other words, it should not be coloured by political, religious, cultural or other considerations.
The group recognized the difficulty of defining incitement butconcluded that the lack of an agreed definition of terrorism should not be used as a pretext for inaction, since all are aware of what terrorism is.
Any definition of terrorism should also take into account the use by States of technologically sophisticated means which caused infrastructural damage and spread fear with a view to imposing control.
Any comprehensive convention on international terrorism must address the issue of State terrorism and any definition of terrorism should be crafted in such a way as to cover all terrorist activities, whether sponsored by a State or non-State actor.
The definition of terrorism should be crafted so as not to exclude any type of terrorist activities, whether sponsored by a State or religious sect, a non-State actor or an individual demagogue.
Regarding the definition of terrorism, the Special Rapporteur would like to recall that at the national level,a definition of terrorism should include three cumulative elements-- the aim, the purpose and the means, with an emphasis on the last element, i.e. seeing terrorism as a choice of morally inexcusable tactics.
The definition of terrorism should include State terrorism, which was much more destructive. Furthermore, measures to combat terrorism should not in any way violate basic principles of human rights.
The work of the General Assembly to develop the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, the efforts to put in place a comprehensive convention on terrorism, andthe calls for establishing a clear definition of terrorism should all lead to an internationally agreed transparent and balanced definition of terrorism that ensures the success of counter-terrorism efforts at all levels.
The view was expressed that the definition of terrorism should extend to an attempt to commit terrorist acts and that terrorist acts should not be differentiated on the basis of their scale or damage.
In that connection, the protracted discussions on the draft comprehensive convention on international terrorism, a process currently hindered by the international community's inability to agree on a universally accepted definition of terrorism, should be accelerated since such a definition was crucial to ending impunity for the perpetrators of terrorist acts and improving the international response thereto.
Some delegations had reiterated that a clear definition of terrorism should be included in the draft convention, as well as a clear distinction between acts of terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples against foreign occupation.
The legal definition of terrorism should take into account the legitimate struggles of peoples for self-determination, freedom and independence in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations, international law and human rights.
They reiterated their view that a universal definition of terrorism should be adopted and that a comprehensive global anti-terrorist convention should be elaborated.
The definition of terrorism should condemn State terrorism, which included foreign military occupation and/or the forced annexation of land or property, crimes against humanity and war crimes, as the worst form of terrorism. .
These debates have, inter alia,brought out the issue of whether a definition of terrorism should focus only on acts carried out by non-State actors, or whether it should incorporate as well the concept of State or State-sponsored terrorism. .
Any definition of terrorism should focus on the aspect which set it apart from other crimes, namely its purpose, which was to subject the population to terror as a means of forcing a Government or organization to adopt a particular line of action.
There is a growing understanding that any definition of terrorism should focus on terrorist acts against civilians, regardless of whether such acts are committed by persons, individually or collectively, or by states and their organs.
According to them, a definition of terrorism should reaffirm the resolve of the international community that all forms and manifestations of terrorist acts, wherever and by whomever committed, could never be justified.
A comprehensive legal definition of terrorism should not only draw a clear distinction between terrorism and people's legitimate struggle for the right of self-determination, but must also take into account all forms of terrorism, including State-sponsored terrorism. .
As to paragraphs 49 and 59,it should clarify the definition of terrorism as emerging from the law of 2003 which should not be used to limit freedom of association and expression or forms of political disagreement expressed without violence.
Another issue was the definition of terrorism that should be adopted.
The convention should include a clear definition of terrorism, which should exclude the legitimate struggle for self-determination of peoples under foreign occupation or colonial or alien domination.
Since it was difficult to reach a consensus on a general definition of terrorism, States should continue to reinforce their cooperation through international judicial procedures and the exchange of information.
The draft comprehensive convention on international terrorism should contain a clear definition of terrorism that took into account the legitimate rights of peoples under colonial and foreign occupation.