Примеры использования Delegation to specify на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
He asked the delegation to specify which neighbourhood was meant.
It noted that the appeal for international assistance was therefore of crucial importance andthus invited the delegation to specify, if possible, the priority areas in which it would like to receive special assistance.
He asked the delegation to specify the circumstances in which it was felt that restrictions should be maintained.
Noting that work permits could only be withdrawn if a crime was committed,she asked the delegation to specify which bodies or persons could withdraw permits and what the procedure was for withdrawal.
He asked the delegation to specify what those offences were and to indicate the numbers of persons sentenced under that legislation.
With regard to the Constitutional Court(paras.16 to 18 of the report), he asked the delegation to specify the precise scope of that Court's jurisdiction and to explain how it differed from a Supreme Court.
He asked the delegation to specify whether that meant that international treaties were self-executing, or whether implementing legislation was required.
With reference to issues arising in connection with article 1 of the Convention and paragraph 53 of the third periodic report,he would like the delegation to specify which articles of the Convention were regarded as self-executing in Cypriot law, and which were not.
He also asked the delegation to specify the maximum duration of pretrial detention.
Article 43 of the Code of Criminal Procedure upheld the right of a detainee to the assistance of a lawyer from the moment of detention,but she asked the delegation to specify whether the term"moment of detention" was construed as running from the time when a suspect was apprehended, when he was taken to a custodial facility or when charges were laid against him.
She asked the delegation to specify the circumstances in which the police and armed forces operated jointly and to clarify the details of the state of emergency.
Taking note of the creation of the Justice and Reconciliation Commission which had considered the gross human rights violations committed, identified the victims andassessed their eligibility for compensation, he asked the delegation to specify the violations in question,to indicate which population groups had been victims of abuses, who the perpetrators were and whether those persons would be obliged to answer for their actions in the courts.
He also invited the delegation to specify whether birth certificates were issued for all children, including the children of refugees.
With regard to article12 of the Convention, he asked the delegation to specify, with regard to psychiatric hospitals, what procedure existed for filing a complaint in cases of torture and what action was taken on such complaints.
He asked the delegation to specify whether the Supreme Court could rule only on points of law or whether it could reconsider the merits of a case when dealing with an appeal of that kind and whether the compensation awarded to victims of torture by the civil courts were in all cases made ex gratia.
Recalling the provisions of article3 of the Convention, she asked the delegation to specify what constituted substantial grounds, under Swiss law, for believing that a person was in danger of being subjected to torture and the rules of evidence which were applicable.
He also invited the delegation to specify how exactly recourse to diplomatic assurances offered sufficient guarantees under article 3 of the Convention.
He asked the Lithuanian delegation to specify what the grounds for restriction were and to provide further information on that point.
He asked the delegation to specify which domestic law was referred to and provide some examples of how that principle was put into practice.
He asked the delegation to specify the types of restraint devices carried by prison guards, such as tear gas, pepper gas, batons and various kinds of weapons.
He therefore asked the delegation to specify what percentage was allocated to poor areas in central and western China and what percentage to minority areas.
In addition, Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked the delegation to specify whether police prosecutors actually existed in the State Party, and to describe in detail how the prosecution was structured.
He would like the delegation to specify whether it was an official doctrine which had to be accepted by everyone or whether it was possible not to adhere to it.
He asked the delegation to specify the extent to which the Albanian language was used in Kosovo for toponyms, in judicial proceedings and in the activities of public bodies.
He also invited the delegation to specify the place of the Convention in Spain's domestic legislation and to say whether it could be invoked directly before the Spanish courts.
He asked the Mauritian delegation to specify whether the special measures for the protection of witnesses and vulnerable persons, described in paragraph 86 of the report under consideration, had already been introduced.
He asked the delegation to specify whether the rights and guarantees provided for in the Constitution and other relevant laws extended to migrant workers in irregular situations and their families.
She also asked the delegation to specify the official title of the person who currently held the position as the Advocate for Equal Opportunities for Women and Men and Advocate of the Principle of Equality.
He also asked the delegation to specify the steps taken by the State party to guarantee that detainees had access to a private doctor and their right to confidentiality of medical data.
She would also like the delegation to specify the exact reason why remand and convicted prisoners were held on the same premises and why there was no real justice system for minors.