Примеры использования Delegation was in favour на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
His delegation was in favour of option 3.
The second sentence of paragraph 5 provided clarification, and his delegation was in favour of retaining it.
His delegation was in favour of consensual initiatives.
Mr. Khani Jooyabad(Islamic Republic of Iran)said that his delegation was in favour of retaining the draft article.
His delegation was in favour of adopting a flexible method of work.
Mr. Abbas(Pakistan), supported by Ms. Goicochea(Cuba), Mr. Ramlal(Trinidad and Tobago), Mr. Al-Eryani(Yemen), Ms. Udo(Nigeria) and Ms. Baroudi(Morocco),said that his delegation was in favour of granting an exemption to Liberia under Article 19.
His delegation was in favour of increasing the number of members of COPUOS.
Referring to the proposal made by Sierra Leone for the establishment of a dispute prevention and early settlement service(A/53/33, chap. IV),he said that his delegation was in favour of avoiding duplication and preserving the freedom of States to choose whatever means they considered appropriate for the peaceful resolution of disputes.
His delegation was in favour of reverting to the wording of article 90 of the United Nations Sales Convention.
As to the list of crimes, his delegation was in favour of including all the subparagraphs.
His delegation was in favour of giving the Prosecutor ex officio power to initiate an investigation and supported article 6 c.
Ms. PEÑA(Mexico) said that her delegation was in favour of providing without delay the funding requested for UNOMSA.
His delegation was in favour of taking additional time to consider the issue, if that would allow the Committee to reach a consensus.
With respect to paragraph 6, her delegation was in favour of the period in question being two full years.
Her delegation was in favour of deleting paragraph 2 since the Statute already contained a provision on applicable law in article 20.
With respect to the form of the event, her delegation was in favour of a self-standing, high-level conference under United Nations auspices.
His delegation was in favour of basing the legal regime for unilateral acts on the 1969 Convention on the Law of Treaties.
With regard to article 106, his delegation was in favour of the scale of contributions to the regular budget of the United Nations being used for the Court.
With respect to paragraph 2(e), his delegation was in favour of full-time judges; the reference to judges appointed on a part-time basis should be deleted.
Another representative said that his delegation was in favour of authorizing only the quantities recommended for critical uses by the Panel and that the substance should be sourced exclusively from existing stocks.
However, other delegations were in favour of redrafting the paragraph and the title.
As regards the final document, delegations were in favour of a"Statement" or"Recommendations", rather than a"Declaration";
Some delegations were in favour of starting to work on non-binding guidelines, leaving aside legally binding options for consideration at a later stage if at all.
Most delegations were in favour of employing the definitions used in inland navigation, particularly those contained in the Rhine Inspection Rules and in Directive 2006/87/EC.
Some delegations were in favour of restricting the right to submit a communication to child victims or their legal representatives.
Most delegations were in favour of removing the square brackets around subparagraph(b) in that article, thereby making the accommodation of reporting on diffuse sources a core element of PRTRs.
However, many delegations were in favour of deleting the paragraph because they were not in favour of defining the subsequent steps at this stage.
While some delegations were in favour of requesting comments solely from the Court, others stressed that comments should be requested from both the Court and Member States.
Most delegations were in favour of the workshop addressing deliberate release, including placing on the market, and some delegations were also in favour of contained use being covered.
Two delegations were in favour of adding an additional sentence providing that"States should strive,in particular, to facilitate access for children to information regarding the activities and the functioning of the Committee.