Примеры использования Development support services на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Development support services.
A fixed annual allocation of $6 million for the Development Support Services facility;
Ii development support services;
D Expenditures that could not be broken down by sector; these include Programme and biennial support budgets as well as other development support services.
Development support services $6 million.
Люди также переводят
A/ includes programme support costs, programme support to resident coordinator system, development support services, and economists programme.
Line 3.1.1- Development support services.
A/ Includes regional, global and other programmes(Evaluation, TCDC,Programme of Assistance to the Palestine People, development support services, etc.) for programme, donor and local resources.
Development support services and UNDP economist programme.
Moreover, in the case of Colombia,the evaluation indicated that over-concentration on development support services poses a risk to the reputation of UNDP and raises questions about its business model.
Development support services: Development effectiveness.
In addition, programme-related activities, currently covered by the biennial support budget, have been rationalized,including a shift of the allocation for development support services from the budget to the programme.
Development support services provide a strategic capacity for rapid response and support to upstream initiatives in UNDP areas of work.
Notes Covers, both for regular and other programme resources, regional and global programmes and other Evaluation, TCDC,Programme of Assistance to the Palestine People, Central America, Development Support Services, etc.
They emphasized the Economists' Programme and Development Support Services should focus on strategic interventions while traditional technical assistance should be covered at the country programme level.
UNDP should submit, in the context of the Administrator's budget proposal for 1998-1999, an evaluation report, through the Advisory Committee, to the Executive Board on the development support services programme, with the aim of determining the extent to which this initiative has met its intended objectives;
Hence, the UNSAF(old SPPD/STS) facility and the development support services shown under the country programme subheading as the concerned facilities are designed for programme activities at the country level.
The Committee is of the opinion that the role of the SURFs should be monitored carefully, in light of technological developments andother facilities now available to the country offices through UNDP, such as development support services(DSS) and other organizations, regional or international, including the specialized agencies.
For line 3.1,support to the resident coordinator and development support services(DSS), line 1.4, evaluation line and line 1.5, technical cooperation among developing countries, the following fixed allocations are proposed for reasons explained below.
The Committee also recalls that, in paragraph 41 of its report DP/1995/52, it recommended that the Administrator submit, in the context of his budget proposal for the biennium 1998-1999, an evaluation report on the development support services(DSS) programme, with the aim of determining the extent to which this initiative has met its intended objectives.
DSS: development support services; EO: Evaluation Office; HDRO: Human Development Report Office; LIC: low-income country; NCC: net contributor country; ODS: Office of Development Studies; RC: resident coordinator; SPPD: support services for policy and programme development; STS: support for technical services as the project level; TCDC: technical cooperation among developing countries.
Programme expenditure, including programme support to the resident coordinator system, development support services and the UNDP economist programme, had increased by 4 per cent, from $498 million to $520 million see table 5.
Recalls decision 2013/4, acknowledges the information provided in DP/2013/37 and requests UNDP to provide, in the informal discussion leading up to the formal discussion of the integrated budget, before the second regular session 2013, information presenting the funding requirements and the rationale, the interrelationships andthe synergies for the functions financed under the following fixed lines: development support services, economists' programme, policy advisory services, as well as the Office of Development Studies.
Programme expenditure, including programme support to the resident coordinator system, and development support services decreased slightly by 1 per cent, from $3.77 billion in 2008 to $3.73 billion in 2009.
Such increases would be both in absolute dollar terms(about $18 million,taking into consideration that the Economist Programme and part of the development support services allocation are currently financed from savings under the 2002-2003 biennial support budget) and as a percentage of available programme resources about 4 per cent, taking into consideration that HDRO and ODS are currently financed under line 1.3.
The components enumerated below support programme quality, coherence and alignment and relate to results in South-South cooperation, gender mainstreaming, and cross-cutting support at country and regional levels,through:(a) in-country catalytic support, through development support services; and(b) in-country strategic economic advisory support, through the economists programme; complemented by(c) regional advisory support, through policy advisory services. .
Programme expenditure, including programme support to the resident coordinator system, development support services, and UNDP economist programme, increased by 10 per cent, from $561 million in 2007 to $617 million in 2008.
Programme expenditure from regular resources,including programme support to the resident coordinator system, development support services, and the UNDP economist programme, increased by 3 per cent, from $617 million in 2008 to $635 million in 2009.
Total programme expenditure,which includes programme support to the resident coordinator system, development support services and the economist programme, amounted to $4.53 billion, a 0.2 per cent increase over the 2008 expenditure of $4.52 billion.
Aggregate programme expenditure,which includes programme support costs, programme support to the resident coordinator system, development support services and economist programme, amounted to $4.53 billion, a 13 per cent increase over the 2007 expenditure of $4.01 billion.