Примеры использования Duration of registration на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Duration of registration.
Extend or reduce duration of registration.
Duration of registration of citizenship: 3 months;
However, in a jurisdiction that prescribed a maximum duration of registration, the result would be the same regardless of the registry's response.
The duration of registration of the PLC company is about 5 weeks.
Yet another suggestion was that the problem of option B not setting any limit to the duration of registration could also be discussed in the commentary.
Cost and duration of registration services for sole traders.
Ms. Walsh(Canada), referring back to the initial notice,said that section D of form I concerning duration of registration stated that the notice would be effective until a certain date.
As to the exact time of the duration of registration, it was stated that it depended on the average life of a financing agreement.
With respect to form IV(Amendment notice pursuant to a judicial oradministrative order), the Commission agreed that section G(extend or reduce duration of registration) should be deleted entirely.
The tax authorities have the right to extend the duration of registration procedures in cases where a new entity is founded, if changes are made to administration, founding members and/or registry holders for up to 20 additional days.
Another suggestion was that reference should be made to article 26 to clarify that a renewal of the duration of registration would take place by way of registration of an amendment notice.
In addition, it was observed that the problem could be addressed by way of calculating registration fees on a per year basis,thus discouraging overreaching in the choice of the duration of registration.
In systems where the law prescribed a maximum duration of registration, the registry would normally be structured in such a way as to prevent periods greater than the maximum duration from being registered.
Mr. Patch(Australia) enquired about the practical consequences of the receipt by the registry of a notice specifying a duration of registration that exceeded the maximum period permitted by law.
With respect to incorrect statements in the notice as to the duration of registration, new text should be added to track the text of recommendation 66(with respect to the protection of third parties that relied on such notices) and the relevant commentaryof the Guide(see chapter IV, paras. 89-91);
The constitutional referendum, initially slated to take place on 27 November,had to be postponed owing to the need to extend the duration of registration, particularly in the provinces of Bandundu and Equateur.
Yet another suggestion was that subparagraph 1(d), should be placed within square brackets and the relevant footnote should be expanded to clarify that the subparagraph would apply only if the enacting State chose in article 11 option B or C,permitting the registrant to select the duration of registration.
With regard to recommendation Z,the representative of France had pointed out that an error in the description of the duration of registration or the maximum amount secured seemed to have no consequences whatsoever.
In addition, it was noted that,if the law allowed parties to determine the duration of registration(see recommendation 66), erroneous statements of the duration of registration would be corrected by the system, as, if the registrant paid for 5 years but stated 10 years on the notice, the notice would be cancelled after the expiry of 5 years, while, if the registrant paid for 10 years but wrote 5 years on the notice, the registrant could amend the notice at any time see recommendation 70.
Recommendation Z stated that an error in the information provided in the notice with respect to the duration of registration and the maximum amount secured did not render a registered notice ineffective.
It was also noted that whether or not the registry would reject an erroneous statement in that regard was a matter of the technical design of the registry that would not affect the duration of registration under the law.
Mr. Weise(American Bar Association)said that section J of form II entitled"Extend or reduce duration of registration" should be amended in the light of the amendments adopted at the previous meeting to recommendation 13.
In option B, the maximum time limit should be deleted and set out in an option C,while the second sentence should be deleted, since in an electronic registry of a self-select system, a notice would be rejected if the duration of registration had not been selected; and.
The law should provide that an error in the information provided in the notice with respect to the duration of registration and the maximum amount secured, if applicable, does not render a registered notice ineffective.
With respect to form II(Amendment notice), the Commission agreed that:(a)"registration no. of initial notice" in the second box should be revised to"registration no. of the initial notice to which the amendment relates"(the same changes should be made to the second box of form IV and to form VIII,section B.2); and(b) section J should read"J. Extend duration of registration" and should be revised to reflect options A to C of recommendation 13.
In response to another question, it was noted that,if the law prescribed a limited duration of registration(see recommendation 66), an erroneous statement would not affect the duration of the registration to the extent permitted by the law.
The notice need only provide basic information concerning the security right, that is:(a) the name or other identifier of the grantor and the secured creditor or its representative,as well as their addresses;(b) a description of the encumbered asset;(c) the duration of registration; and(d) a statement of the maximum amount for which the security right may be enforced, if so provided in a State enacting the law recommended in the Guide see recommendation 57.
Yet another suggestion was that, while, under article 17,if the registrant could choose the duration of registration and failed to do so, the registry would reject the notice, the commentary could discuss the possibility of the registry being designed so as to automatically insert a duration time.
One suggestion was that, as in paragraph 1 of option C, in paragraph 1 of options A and B,reference should be made to the duration of registration of the initial notice, as the duration of the renewal(amendment) notice was addressed in paragraph 2 of all three options.