Примеры использования Falls within category на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
When a house has an annex, such as a garage,a warehouse or a shed, this falls within category C.
Her detention falls within category II of the categories applicable to the cases submitted to the Working Group.
Additionally, the detention of Mr. Al Ammari from 5 December 2013 to the present falls within category I of the categories referred to by the Working Group.
His detention falls within Category III of the categories of arbitrary detention developed by the Working Group.
The deprivation of liberty of the 19 individuals solely for dissenting opinions, thus, falls within category II of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
Finally, the facts that Dr. Said Zair:( a) has not been brought before a judge;( b) has not had a fair trial before an impartial and independent tribunal;( c) has been unable to challenge the lawfulness of his detention;( d) has not had a defence lawyer; and(e) has been kept in incommunicado detention for more than one year and five months, falls within Category III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.
His detention also falls within category II of the categories applicable to the cases submitted to the Working Group.
The deprivation of liberty of Lieutenant Colonel Bertrand Mamour from 15 June 2002 on is arbitrary and falls within category I of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
His detention thus falls within category III of the categories applicable to the cases submitted to the Working Group.
The detention of Cao Maobing in a psychiatric hospital is arbitrary,being in contravention of article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and falls within category I of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
The arbitrary detention falls within category II of the categories applicable to the cases submitted to the Working Group.
The deprivation of liberty of Messrs. Al Karoui and Matri is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 9 and10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and falls within category III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.
The arbitrary detention falls within category II of the categories applicable to the cases submitted to the Working Group.
The Working Group concludes that in the present case, there are violations of articles 5, 9 and11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and that the case falls within category III of the arbitrary detention categories referred to by the Working Group when considering cases submitted to it.
Their detention thus falls within category III of the categories applicable to the cases submitted to the Working Group.
Therefore, his arrest and detention are arbitrary, being in contravention of article 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and of article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights, and falls within category III of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
Therefore, his detention falls within Category I of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.
The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Al Uteibi is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 9 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and articles 9 and 19 of the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights, and falls within category II of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group.
Mr. Chen's deprivation of liberty thus falls within category II of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
In the absence of all comment by the Government, the Working Group believes, in view of the circumstances of the case, that the detention of Colonel Mamour is arbitrary,being without any legal basis, and falls within category I of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Chamia, thus, falls within category II of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
The deprivation of liberty of Somyot Prueksakasemsuk, being in contravention of article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 19, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,is arbitrary and falls within category II of the arbitrary detention categories referred to by the Working Group when considering the cases submitted to it.
Thus, the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Tohti falls within category III of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
The deprivation of liberty of Marcus Haldon Hodge is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 9 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as well as articles 9, 10 and11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; it falls within category III of the arbitrary detention categories referred to by the Working Group when considering the cases submitted to it.
Thus, the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Turgunov falls within category III of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
In the light of the foregoing, the Working Group considers that, since 16 April 2012, the detention of Mr. Tadic Astorga has absolutely no legal basis, neither in Bolivian law nor in the relevant norms of international human rights law,and therefore falls within category I of the categories applied by the Working Group when considering cases submitted for its attention.
Thus, Mr. Salim's andMr. Omar's deprivation falls within category III of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Al-Maleh solely forexpression of his opinions, thus, falls within category II of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
Thus, the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Al Bajadi falls within category II of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Group.
Therefore, the Working Group finds that his detention also falls within Category II of the categories applicable to the consideration of the case submitted to the Working Group.