Примеры использования Foreign works на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
He translated and edited foreign works as well.
Foreign works of Murmansk artists, 1996, 1997, Norway.
You have ever read foreign works in the original?
Foreign works are covered by section 54 read with the International Copyright Order, 1968.
In the United States, the Act restored copyright status to foreign works previously in the public domain.
Under these provisions, foreign works not formerly copyrighted in Russia should also have become copyrighted in Russia.
Likewise, Soviet publishers were free to negotiate with foreign authors orpublishers licenses to publish foreign works in the Soviet Union.
Furthermore, copyrights on foreign works were made subject to the rule of the shorter term.
Russian legal scholars had warned of this, andthe government feared the impacts on the trade balance with Western countries if Russian publishers would suddenly have to pay royalties for foreign works.
Earlier foreign works that were not covered by other treaties and that had until then not been subject to copyright in the U.S. remained uncopyrighted in the United States.
Nevertheless, the common practice in Russia did not change;pre-1973 foreign works were still commonly considered to be uncopyrighted in Russia due to this reservation.
Since then, foreign works subject to the Berne Convention are copyrighted in Russia if they were copyrighted in the source country when Russia joined the Berne convention i.e., in 1995.
The new article 5(4) of the Russian copyright law was supposed to resolve the situation by restoring copyright on such foreign works and making Russia's copyright law fully compliant with the Berne Convention.
A effectively copyrights many foreign works that were never before copyrighted in the U.S. The works are subject to the normal U.S. copyright term, as if they had never entered the public domain.
According to the Russian representative at the negotiations on Russia's accession to the WTO, law 72-FL indeed was intended to rescind the non-retroactivity reservation,thereby restoring copyrights on pre-1973 foreign works.
Previously, foreign works published before May 27, 1973, when the USSR had joined the Universal Copyright Convention(UCC), had not been copyrighted at all in the Soviet Union or in Russia, even after Russia had joined the Berne Convention in 1995.
The VAAP replaced the several previously existing collecting societies(such as the VUOAP),taking over their tasks and additionally managing copyrights on foreign works in the USSR and also the copyrights on Soviet works abroad.
By virtue of the UCC, foreign works first published after May 27, 1973 outside of the USSR became copyrighted in the Soviet Union if the author was a national of any other signatory country of the UCC, irrespective of where this publication occurred, or if the work was first published in any other UCC country, regardless of the nationality of the author.
Patry also concedes that under the Berne Convention,the U.S. would indeed be required to grant copyright to foreign works, even if such works were not copyrighted in their country of origin as per article 5(2) of the Berne Convention.
At the time, Italy applied a copyright period of 56 years pma, so Italian protection had expired at the end of 1980: Germany, however, applied a 70 years pma period to works of German authors and the"rule of the shorter term"(Art. 7.8 Berne Convention) to foreign works.
For Russian and Soviet work that originated in Russia, this was just a restatement of article 18(1) of the Berne Convention;but as far as foreign works were concerned, this reservation effectively denied the retroactivity of the Berne Convention within Russia.
In addition, the Contracting Parties undertake, as far as possible support through appropriate policy provisions applicable to the distribution of royalties, the principle of solidarity between the members of the opposing sides,even in cases where as a result of local law foreign works were subject to discrimination.
It amended Title 17("Copyrights") of the United States Code to include a completely reworded article 104A on copyright restorations on foreign works and to include a new chapter 11, containing a prohibition of bootleg sound and video recordings of live performances.
Since its accession to the Berne Convention in 1995,the following foreign works were copyrighted in Russia: Soviet works published in the Russian SFSR, as well as works of authors who became citizens of the Russian federation after the demise of the USSR became subject to the copyright law of the Russian Federation of 1993(and its amendments) due to the strict territoriality of copyright law.
Luxembourg also continues to support the translation of literary works, whether written by native authors orauthors residing in Luxembourg, or foreign works considered to be of genuine cultural or intercultural interest.
When the USSR joined the UCC in 1973 and the treaty entered in force withrespect to the USSR on May 27, 1973, foreign works first published on or after that date outside of the USSR became copyrighted in the Soviet Union if the author was a national of any other signatory country of the UCC, irrespective of where this publication occurred, or if the work was first published in any other UCC country, regardless of the nationality of the author.
International copyright treaties such as the Berne Convention(BC) or the Universal Copyright Convention(UCC) work through national treatment:signatory countries agree to grant copyright to foreign works under their local laws and by the same rules they grant copyright to domestic works. .
The accession to the UCC caused a dual system in Soviet copyright law, with the effect that foreign works published after May 27, 1973,were actually granted a stronger copyright protection than Soviet works because for foreign works the definition of the UCC of"publication" applied, which was narrower than the definition of"publication" in Soviet law, which continued to be applied to Soviet works. .
The Countries- Suppliers of Foreign Work Force to Russia.
Given the size of the foreign working population in Monaco, the rules concerning priority of recruitment had no adverse effect on foreigners' access to employment.