Примеры использования Formulation of a reservation на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Formulation of a reservation at the.
Objection to late formulation of a reservation.
Formulation of a reservation at the international level.
Draft guideline 2.3.1 Late formulation of a reservation.
Late formulation of a reservation.
Люди также переводят
Since enlargement of the scope of a reservation can be viewed as late formulation of a reservation, it seems inevitable that the same rules should apply.
Late formulation of a reservation.
The possibility of enlarging the scope of a reservation would therefore be subject to very strict conditions,namely the rules applicable to late formulation of a reservation.
Joint formulation of a reservation.
The fact that a treaty provision reflects a rule of customary international law does not in itself constitute an obstacle to the formulation of a reservation to that provision.
Late formulation of a reservation by a successor State 585.
Concerning draft guideline 3.1.8,the fact that a treaty norm reflected a norm of customary international law was no impediment to the formulation of a reservation.
Draft guideline 2.1.3 Formulation of a reservation at the international level.
Secondly, the Special Rapporteur had proposed that the fact that a treaty provision reflected a customary norm should not in itself prevent the formulation of a reservation to that provision.
Since the formulation of a reservation operated against the implementation and even the entry into force of a treaty, the other contracting parties were entitled to know the reasons why the reservation had been formulated.
There must be no exceptions to that fundamental rule; in that regard,the statute should contain a provision that would prevent States parties from avoiding that obligation through the formulation of a reservation.
Given that the relevant rules regarding the formulation of a reservation are duly specified in Part 2 of the Guide to Practice, paragraph 3 of this guideline refers to that part of the Guide.
His delegation agreed that the fact that a treaty provision reflected a rule of customary international law did not in itself constitute an obstacle to the formulation of a reservation to that provision.
If the term"formulation of a reservation" was understood as producing an immediate legal effect, it was questionable whether representatives to international conferences should be empowered to perform such an act.
With regard to the enlargement of the scope of a reservation, it seemed that such a possibility went beyond the time limit set for the formulation of a reservation under article 19 of the Vienna Conventions.
Draft guideline 2.1.3,"Formulation of a reservation at the international level", defined the persons and organs authorized, by virtue of their functions, to formulate a reservation on behalf of a State or an international organization.
The question which guideline 3.1.5.5 seeks to answer is a different one,namely whether the formulation of a reservation(clearly expressed and sufficiently detailed) can be justified by considerations arising from internal law.
The reference in square brackets would not be necessary if, as the Special Rapporteur suggests, the above draft guideline is included under section 2.3 of the Guide to Practice,entitled"Late formulation of a reservation.
The provisions contained in the draft guidelines should apply: in other words,the State party could resort to late formulation of a reservation or enlargement of its scope, provided the other States parties raised no objections.
Furthermore, the possibility of enlarging the scope of a reservation would, under the Special Rapporteur's proposal, be subject to very strict conditions: as draft guideline 2.3.5 stated,such an enlargement would be subject to the"rules applicable to late formulation of a reservation.
With regard to guideline 1.1.7,he shared the view of the Commission that, while joint formulation of a reservation by a number of States could be made, it should not in any way affect the unilateral nature of such a statement.
Moreover, the formulation whereby the rules on the widening or limitation of a conditional interpretative declaration were explained by reference to draft guideline 2.3.5,which in turn referred the reader to draft guideline 2.3.1("Late formulation of a reservation"), was not entirely successful.
Similarly, where the possibility of formulating reservations was prohibited by the treaty in question, the formulation of a reservation would not only violate article 19 of the Vienna Convention but would also cause a"fragmentation" of the treaty, the actual scope of which would become difficult to determine.
The modification of an existing reservation for the purpose of enlarging the scope of the reservation shall be subject to the rules applicable to late formulation of a reservation as set forth in guidelines 2.3.1, 2.3.2 and 2.3.3.
As guideline 5.1.8 below indicates,it is necessary to consider that the formulation of a reservation by a successor State, formed from a uniting or separation of States, in respect of which the treaty remains in force should be likened to the late formulation of a reservation. .