Примеры использования Has not exhausted all domestic на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Second, the State party contends that the author has not exhausted all domestic remedies.
The author alleges that, although he has not exhausted all domestic remedies, those remedies have been unreasonably prolonged, making it unlikely that an effective solution will ever be reached.
He preferred to turn directly to the Committee even while admitting that he has not exhausted all domestic remedies.
The State party argues, first, that the author has not exhausted all domestic remedies in respect of her allegation that the Canadian refugee protection system is discriminatory.
In respect of the allegationof unduly lengthy proceedings, the State party maintains that the author has not exhausted all domestic remedies.
In the light of the above, the State party considers that the author has not exhausted all domestic remedies and that his allegations of violations are not sufficiently substantiated.
The author has not exhausted all domestic remedies in connection with the complaints that he has brought before the Committee, since the avenue he chose was inappropriate for the reparation of the alleged violations.
With regard to the complaint of a violation of article 17 of the Covenant,the State party considers that the author has not exhausted all domestic remedies considering that he is filing the complaint before the Committee for the first time.
Finally, the author has not exhausted all domestic remedies, inasmuch as he lodged an appeal with the Constitutional Court but the Court has been unable to consider it, given the author's refusal to instruct a lawyer.
In its observations of 7 February 2000, the State party challenges theadmissibility of the communication, arguing that Asensio López has not exhausted all domestic remedies since he had the possibility of appointing counsel and submitting the application for reconsideration in the proper manner.
The State party claims that the author has not exhausted all domestic remedies given that the Council of Ministers decision of 19 November 2010 authorizing the author's handover was appealable before the Supreme Court and later, if necessary, before the Constitutional Court in the form of an application for amparo.
On the claim that the eligibility requirements for acquiring Australian citizenship are unequally imposed upon New Zealand citizens so as to render them ineligible toapply for Australian citizenship, the State party submits that the author has not exhausted all domestic remedies, as he has not taken steps preparatory to applying for Australian citizenship.
On 23 January 2007, the State party argued that the author has not exhausted all domestic remedies and that his allegations that his rights have been violated are insufficiently substantiated.
Regarding the argument that he has not exhausted all domestic remedies, the author submits that such remedies should be available and efficient and that, according to the Committee's practice, an efficient remedy is one that provides compensation and offers a reasonable prospect of redress.
The Committee takes note of the State party's argument that the author has not exhausted all domestic remedies, given that he selected an inappropriate remedy for the alleged violations, and that he has not filed a special federal appeal with the Supreme Court against the Federal Chamber's decision of 13 July 2012.
The State party notes, in addition,that the complainant has not exhausted all domestic remedies with regard to his first asylum application, since the appeal that he had lodged against the decision of the Federal Office for Migration of 25 March 2008 was rejected on 6 May 2008 by the Federal Administrative Tribunal because it had been submitted after the legal deadline.
The State party considers that the authors have not exhausted all domestic remedies.
Additionally, the State party argues that the authors have not exhausted all domestic remedies.
The two communications which had been submitted against the Government to date had been found inadmissible because the authors had not exhausted all domestic remedies.
Consequently, since the authors have not exhausted all domestic remedies, their communication is inadmissible.
As to the complaintof unreasonably lengthy proceedings, the State party considers that the authors have not exhausted all domestic remedies.
The Committee takes note of the State party's argument that Mr. Zhuk had not exhausted all domestic remedies at the time of submission of the communication in view of the fact that he had not submitted an application for a supervisory review.
The State party further submits that the author had not exhausted all domestic remedies.(This information was not provided by the State party in its submission on admissibility and the merits). Reference is made to various articles of the Civil Procedure Code which could have been availed of by the author.
The Committee takes note of the argument of the State party that Mr. Yuzepchuk had not exhausted all domestic remedies at the time of submission of the communication, in view of the fact that he had not submitted an application for a supervisory review by the Supreme Court.
Since March 2005, the UK has been named in only two applications to the UN CEDAW committee, andboth were found inadmissible on the ground that the applicants had not exhausted all domestic remedies that were available to them.
Therefore, in the absence of an explanation from the authors to demonstrate that, in their case, this remedy was not available orwas not effective, the Committee concludes that the authors have not exhausted all domestic remedies.
Ms. Nikolova(Bulgaria) said that, with regard to the response to the Committee's decision on theKeremedchiev case(communication No. 257/2004), the individual concerned had not exhausted all domestic remedies.
The State party considers, therefore, that the requirements of article 5, paragraph 2(b),have not been met, since the authors have not exhausted all domestic remedies to redress the alleged violation.
In this respect, the Government considers that the petitioners were not deprived of their liberty unlawfully and that they have not exhausted all domestic legal recourses, in particular individual recourse before the Turkish Constitutional Court.
With regard to the requirement laid down in article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol,the Committee takes note of the State party's argument that Mr. Kovalev had not exhausted all domestic remedies at the time of submission of his communication in view of the fact that his applications for supervisory review and for presidential pardon were still pending before national authorities.