Примеры использования High administrative court на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
On 31 January 2001, the High Administrative Court dismissed the appeal.
File an extraordinary appeal with the Supreme Court against a judgement of the High Administrative Court;
In the High Administrative Court in 1993 136 judges were employed, including 9 judges employed part-time.
Furthermore, it notes that the State party itself emphasized that the High Administrative Court was a tribunal within the meaning of article 14, paragraph 1.
Act on the High Administrative Court of 11 May 1995(Dz. U. No. 74, item 368 with later amendments);
A total of 29 cases were reviewed by the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeals,of which 17 were subsequently appealed to the High Administrative Court.
Moreover, in 1993 the High Administrative Court examined 1,486 cases with the participation of the public prosecutor.
For example, in the verdict delivered on 28 February 1994 concerning permits for aliens to be domiciled in Poland, the High Administrative Court referred directly to the provisions included in article 23 of the Covenant.
In 1992 the High Administrative Court had 24,336 complaints filed, i.e. over 10,000 more than in 1989.
Lastly, the author contradicted himself when denying that the disciplinary authorities and the High Administrative Court are tribunals within the meaning of article 14, and at the same time invoking Perterer v. Austria.
The High Administrative Court and regional courts decide on appeals against decisions in asylum and migration procedures.
Neither the Disciplinary Appeals Commission nor the High Administrative Court qualified or acted as tribunals within the meaning of article 14 in his case.
The High Administrative Court and County Administrative courts are specialized courts hearing cases in respect of the disputes arising from administrative legal relations.
In the final stage of parliamentary work is the new High Administrative Court Act providing for further development of the competence of the said Court. .
The Disciplinary Appeals Commission rejected his requests on 25 January and 10 April 1996, respectively.On 7 June 1996, he complained to the High Administrative Court; this complaint was dismissed on 19 December 2002.
He further submits that he complained to the High Administrative Court as soon as he learned from the press that such a recourse was possible.
On the basis of the results obtained 1,769 means of appeal were undertaken, including 1,228 applications for instituting administrative proceedings,358 objections were lodged along with 64 complaints to the High Administrative Court.
He failed to substantiate that the High Administrative Court lacks the attributes of a tribunal within the meaning of article 14 of the Covenant.
In the judiciary, the judicial power is exercised by First Instance Courts, the Courts of Appeal, Administrative Court, the High Administrative Court and the Supreme Court of the Republic of Macedonia.
By decision of 8 May 1996, the High Administrative Court upheld the dismissal, apparently because the author had failed to comply with service discipline.
Despite an active, indeed swashbuckling, style of litigation, Mr. Lederbauer andhis counsel never requested that the High Administrative Court expedite its decision, or even sent a letter of inquiry to the Court. .
He also recalls that it took the High Administrative Court more than seven years to decide on his complaint against the decision suspending him from office, which is unreasonable delay.
In this case,the Committee notes the State party's argument that the author himself submitted that neither the Disciplinary Appeals Commission nor the High Administrative Court"qualified or acted" as tribunals within the meaning of article 14, paragraph 1.
Similarly, the appeal to the High Administrative Court concerning the qualification by the Regional Qualifying Committee was not the proper remedy to be exhausted by the author.
In particular, the High Specialized Court for Civil andCriminal Cases, the High Administrative Court and the High Economic Court function as courts of cassation.
High Administrative Court over decisions taken by the HCJ; the definition of“breach of oath”; different procedural safeguards, including limitation periods and an appropriate scale of sanctions, and also respect for the principle of proportionality.
At various points in time, the author filed five separate appeals to the High Administrative Court, three appeals to the Constitutional Court, and five appeals to the Disciplinary Appeals Commission.
The State party refers to the legal background to the case and argues that the remedy available to the author for the refusal of employment was an appeal to the Police Chief Commander and, if necessary,subsequently to the High Administrative Court.
The State party argues that the author's complaints to the Minister and to the High Administrative Court should not be taken into account, since they were not legal remedies to be exhausted.
Though the High Administrative Court did allow the case to lie upon its docket for a long interval, the finding of actionable delay is rather doubtful against a factual background in which the author was making repeated and conspicuous attempts to impede and revisit every decision reached in his suspension and discharge.