Примеры использования His constitutional rights на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In his country, Morocco, he enjoyed all his constitutional rights and freedoms.
Murashov argued that, in various cultural traditions, symbols and signs in question have meaning not associated with the ideology of Nazism, and, therefore, the ban on their use anddissemination violates his constitutional rights.
Before the February 14 court session Nikol Pashinian claimed that his constitutional rights are being violated at"Artik" penitentiary.
They also examine complaints concerning the decisions and actions(or no action) of central and local public authorities, organizations, enterprises, associations and officials of all ranks who, according to the petitioner's opinion,violated his constitutional rights and freedoms.
Anyone who believed that his constitutional rights had been violated could apply to the Constitutional Court at any time.
The Government maintains that from the moment of Mr. Turgunov's detention, his constitutional rights were fully observed.
Mr. Velandia Hurtado, in turn,filed a request for protection of his constitutional rights(acción de tutela) with the Administrative Tribunal of Cundinamarca, on the ground that the guarantees of due process had not been respected in his case.
The right to redress is guaranteed to anybody who may deem that a public address has violated his constitutional rights.
The fact that he was an American citizen exercising his constitutional rights meant very little to representatives of the Federal or local Government.
An investigation may also be undertaken by federal authorities(such as the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice),particularly if the prisoner claims his constitutional rights have been violated.
The State party concludes that the author's claims,alleging a violation of his constitutional rights and the international obligations of Belarus, are unfounded.
Respondent lawyers Sansano and Rous, being members of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines claimed that they only assisted complainant De Jesus during the custodial investigation, andthat they had properly advised him of his constitutional rights.
The author maintained that by submitting these motions he was attempting to defend his constitutional rights and that in response he was placed in a psychiatric hospital.
He argues that because of his lack of financial means to retain counsel and the unavailability of legal aid for purposes of filing a constitutional motion before the Supreme(Constitutional)Court of Jamaica, he is effectively barred from exercising his constitutional rights.
The Constitution itself provides that if any person alleges that his constitutional rights are being, or are likely to be contravened, he may apply to the Supreme Court for redress.
In the case of Daniel Musili Nyeki v. Kenya Wildlife Services,the plaintiff's claim was based on the assertion inter alia that the defendant had violated his constitutional rights by treating him in a racially discriminatory manner.
The author argues that the State party has rendered his constitutional rights meaningless and nugatory by failing to provide legal aid for constitutional motions.
For example, in a drug case the accused might argue that the search warrant by which the police entered his house andseized the drugs was defective and that his constitutional rights were therefore violated.
She would also like to know whether a person could defend his constitutional rights before a higher court, and how a decision in his favour would be enforced.
He adds that the State party does not provide legal aid with respect to filing a constitutional motion before the Supreme(Constitutional) Court of Jamaica, and that, as a result,he is effectively barred from exercising his constitutional rights, since he cannot afford to retain counsel.
Section 17 of the Constitution provides that a citizen,who alleges that any of his constitutional rights has been, is being or is likely to be contravened, may apply to the Supreme Court for redress.
The Government in its response dated 19 November 1993 stated that Chen Lantao was tried for inciting mobs to disrupt traffic and fomenting social disorder and specifically denied that his conviction had anything to do with listening to the Voice of America orfor peacefully exercising his constitutional rights.
It refers to section 25 of the Jamaican Constitution,which provides that anyone who alleges that any of his constitutional rights have been violated may apply to the Supreme Court for redress.
He exercised his constitutional rights throughout the litigation process and enjoyed all the legal guarantees of a fair trial at all stages thereof, including the right to legal representation and communication with legal counsel, the right to a presumption of innocence and the right to appeal, through two levels of litigation.
Ms. BAEKOVA(Kyrgyzstan), in response to points raised by Mr. Bhagwati,said a citizen who considered that his constitutional rights had been infringed was entitled to bring a complaint before any court, including the Constitutional Court.
The Act governing his activities provides that anyone can turn to the Parliamentary Commissioner if he considers that as a result of the proceedings of some authority or public service entity, a decision or measure taken, or failure to take measures,he suffered a grievance relating to his constitutional rights, or there is an impending danger of this happening.
A constitutional complaint may be filed by any citizen who deems his constitutional rights to be violated by an act or action of any State body or agency, after exhausting the regular legal remedies.
The author claims that the Minister's refusal to register Mr. Gonzalez as a citizen of Guyana,as well as the failure to comply with the Court order to review his case within the one-month deadline, violates his constitutional rights as the spouse of a Guyanese citizen and amounts to"miscarriage of justice.
Anyone who deems that his constitutional rights and freedoms have been violated by a decision of a judicial or administrative authority or by any other body with public authority can institute proceedings before the Constitutional Court, providing all the admissible legal means(administrative proceedings or audit in a civil or extrajudicial procedure) have been exhausted article 28 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia.
Under our Constitution, on the other hand, as my colleagues will all have had the experience, in every type of Court, a person, for example,charged with a criminal offence who asserts an invasion of his Constitutional rights, leading to the inadmissibility of evidence tendered against him, can have that issue decided in the Court in which he is being tried.