Примеры использования His forcible return на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Bangladeshi authorities would be interested in the reasons for his forcible return.
He claims that his forcible return to India would constitute a violation by Canada of articles 3 and 16 of the Convention.
In complaint No. 319/2007(Singh v. Canada) the complainant, an Indian Sikh,claimed that his forcible return to India would amount to a violation of his rights under article 3 of the Convention.
He claims that his forcible return to Myanmar would constitute a violation by Canada of articles 3 and 16 of the Convention.
The complainant claims that if hewere returned to China, he would be subjected to torture and his forcible return would constitute a breach by Australia of his rights under article 3 of the Convention.
He claimed that his forcible return to the Islamic Republic of Iran would thus be in breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee requested the State party to take steps in response to the finding of a violation of the complainant's rights under articles 3 and22 of the Convention, because of his forcible return to Egypt, and to prevent similar violations in the future.
The complainant claims that his forcible return to Turkey would constitute a breach by Switzerland of its obligations under article 3 of the Convention.
In light of the extensive evidence submitted, both on the general country situation, and on the author's personal circumstances, the Committee considers thatthe author has sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, that his forcible return to Pakistan would expose him to a risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to articles 6 and 7 of the Covenant.
He claims that his forcible return to the Russian Federation would constitute a violation of article 3 of the Convention against Torture by Denmark.
In the light of these considerations, including the complainant's corroborated claims of past torture,the Committee was of the view that there were sufficient arguments to conclude that the complainant would face a personal risk of torture if returned to the Islamic Republic of Iran and that his forcible return to that country would constitute a breach by Denmark of his rights under article 3 of the Convention.
The complainant argues that his forcible return to Turkey constitutes a breach by Denmark of its obligations under article 3, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
He set out several facts in support of his claim, including the political activities of his father, a UDPS member; the political views attributed to the complainant as a result of his father's activities; the fact that he was a Luba from Kasaï and the links of this ethnic group to UDPS; the political situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo; and his detention andtorture following his forcible return to the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2002.
He claims that his forcible return to Sudan would constitute a violation of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment by Australia.
In case No. 1833/2008(X. v. Sweden),the author claimed that his forcible return to Afghanistan would amount to a violation by Sweden of his rights under articles 6 and 7 of the Covenant.
He claims that his forcible return to Iran would amount to a violation by Sweden of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
The Committee declared inadmissible the complainant's claim that his forcible return to India would subject him to severe emotional trauma, thereby violating article 16 of the Convention, and observed that, although his deportation may give rise to subjective fears, it would not amount to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of article 16.
He claims that his forcible return to India would constitute a violation by Canada of articles 3 and 16 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
He claims that his forcible return to Burundi would constitute a violation by Canada of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment.
He claims that his forcible return to Sri Lanka would amount to a violation by Switzerland of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
He claims that his forcible return to Turkey would constitute a violation by the Federal Republic of Germany of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
The complainant claims that his forcible return to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation by the State party of article 3 of the Convention, since he would face a high risk of torture if he were deported to that country, as a young single male Tamil who had previously been arrested and tortured several times as a suspected LTTE activist.
The complainant claims that his forcible return to Iran would constitute a violation by Sweden of article 3 of the Convention, since he would run a high risk of being arrested and subsequently tortured, or even executed, upon return to that country, given his past military functions, as well as the fact that he had expressed his political views in public.
The author claims that his forcible return to Afghanistan amounts to a violation by Sweden of his rights under articles 6 and 7 of the Covenant, since there is a real risk of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, as well as threats to his life in Afghanistan by Afghan authorities, individuals as well as armed groups.
The complainant claims that his forcible return to Ethiopia would constitute a violation by Switzerland of his rights under article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, since he risks being subjected to torture or other inhumane and degrading treatment by the Ethiopian authorities if returned. .
The complainant claims that his forcible return to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation by Switzerland of article 3 of the Convention, since there are substantial grounds for believing that, as a young Tamil who was repeatedly arrested and interrogated by the authorities and militia groups, and whose brother was known to be an LTTE member, he would be subjected to torture upon return to Sri Lanka.