Примеры использования Import of cfcs на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Confirmation on imposing a ban on the import of CFCs from 2010.
Nevertheless, specific regulations concerning lists of licensed importers, import quota allocations, anddegressive schedules have generally only been introduced for the import of CFCs.
The Party has also reported that no licences for import of CFCs will be issued in the refrigeration and air-conditioning sector from 1 January 2010.
The Party had previously notified the Implementation Committee at its thirtyseventh meeting that it continued to implement a ban on the import of CFCs.
Confirmation that Bangladesh would impose a ban from the year 2010 on the import of CFCs for the manufacture of metered-dose inhalers for which there were alternatives;
To note Azerbaijan's undertaking that complete phase-out of CFCs would be achieved by1 January 2005 and to urge Azerbaijan to confirm its introduction of a ban on the import of CFCs, to support that undertaking;
The Committee welcomed the Party's establishment of a permanent ban on the import of CFCs, although it recognized that the Party had itself expressed reservations as to its ability to enforce that ban fully.
In response to a subsequent request by the Secretariat,the Party had explained that these deviations were attributed to the absence of any law to regulate the import of CFCs and the low level of awareness in the country.
Decision XVII/26 had noted that Azerbaijan had introduced a ban on the import of CFCs in accordance with decision XVI/21, but had also noted with concern that the Party had not achieved total phaseout of CFCs by 1 January 2005 as required by that decision.
While all countries visited have covered all controlled substances by legislative acts, specific regulations concerning lists of licensed importers, import quota allocations, anddegressive schedules have generally been introduced for the import of CFCs only.
The recommendation had also requested Azerbaijan to report to the Secretariat on the status of its ban on the import of CFCs and its commitment to achieve total phase-out of CFCs by 1 January 2006.
Azerbaijan had further confirmed that it had consumed CFCs in 2005, reporting consumption prior to the import ban of 21.3 ODP-tonnes of Annex A, group I, CFCs. The Secretariat had requested the Party to submit as soon as possible the date from which the absolute ban on the import of CFCs would commence in Azerbaijan.
The representatives had further explained that action had been taken to avoid future noncompliance through the simplification of the procedures relating to the import of CFCs, including a reduction in the number of agencies involved and a clarification of their roles and responsibilities.
The party explained in its submission that, although it had managed to reduce its CFC consumption to zero since 1995, the vacancy of an environmental officer post and lack of human resources had resulted in its inability to control effectively the import of CFCs into the country during the period 2007- 2008.
Azerbaijan had been included for consideration because of decision XVII/26,which noted that the Party had confirmed the introduction of a ban on the import of CFCs, in accordance with decision XVI/21, but which had also noted with concern that Azerbaijan had not achieved total phaseout of those controlled substances by 1 January 2005, in accordance with that decision.
To date, Azerbaijan had not submitted the requested report on the status of its efforts, in cooperation with UNEP, to seek further assistance from the Global Environment Facility, norhad the Party reported on the status of its ban on the import of CFCs relative to its commitment to achieve total phaseout of CFCs by 2006.
Similarly, in correspondence dated 20 June 2008,Barbados had reported that its existing legislation on import controls already allowed it to restrict the import of CFCs, but that it was also in the process of preparing a dedicated ozone-depleting substance import and export regulation which would allow it to control all substances included in the Montreal Protocol.
At the thirty-eighth meeting of the Committee representatives of the Party had explained that its noncompliance with the Protocol's CFC consumption control measures in 2005 had arisen from a combination of factors, including the time required to complete the complex contractual andlicensing procedures associated with the import of CFCs and the long supply chain in a country the size of the Russian Federation.
As those regulations did not apply formally in 2007, the Party noted,it had been difficult to control imports of CFCs prior to that year.
Due to these activities, illegal imports of CFCs have been detected and seized in several cases.
In the period November 2009- March 2010, however, a voluntary agreement between the Government andCFC importers had ensured zero imports of CFCs.
Due to import licensing andcustoms training, illegal imports of CFCs have been detected and seized in several cases.
Seizure of illegal imports of CFCs and HCFCs in 2004 as a result of its strong enforcement capacity and subsequent compliance with decision XVI/27;
Seizure of illegal imports of CFCs and HCFCs in 2004 as a result of its strong enforcement capacity and subsequent compliance with decision XVI/27;
The high volume of imports of CFCs in 2004 could not be intended for use by those companies; he assumed therefore that it was intended for stockpiles.
Corrective action was under way,resulting in limiting imports of CFCs in 2006 to no more than 69 tonnes and returning the Part to compliance by the end of the year.
To note that Nepal has subsequently reported that 74 ODP-tonnes of imports of CFCs have been detained by its customs authorities as the shipment lacked an import license, and that Nepal therefore wished to report the quantity as illegal trade under the terms of decision XIV/7;
The Party's response had provided additional context with respect to the import and use of CFCs in the Russian Federation for the manufacture of meter-dose inhalers.
To recall that in its decision XV/39 the Fifteenth Meeting of the Parties had congratulated Nepal on seizing 74 ODP-tonnes of imports of CFCs that had been imported in 2000 without an import license, and on reporting the quantity as illegal trade under the terms of decision XIV/7;
To recall that in its decision XV/39, the Fifteenth Meeting of the Parties had congratulated Nepal on seizing 74 ODP tonnes of imports of CFCs that had been imported in 2000 without an import license, and on reporting the quantity as illegal trade under the terms of decision XIV/7;