Примеры использования Inclusion of such a provision на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The inclusion of such a provision does not seem necessary.
Inclusion of such a provision will be considered for enactment by Parliament.
In essence two reasons have been advanced against the inclusion of such a provision.
The inclusion of such a provision in the current context was considered problematic and in need of review.
The sponsor expressed support for the inclusion of such a provision in the text of the paragraph.
The inclusion of such a provision, preferably in article 14, would make it easier for countries to adopt the model law.
The Islamic Republic of Iran said that it was opposed to the inclusion of such a provision and called for its deletion.
The inclusion of such a provision does not imply that all international organizations would necessarily be affected.
ICAO believes the benefits of both the old and the new regimes would be realized with the inclusion of such a provision.
Austria supports the inclusion of such a provision, as international practice underlines the importance of a regular exchange of data and information.
The Committee must respect the wish of the General Assembly,expressed in resolution 421(V), concerning the inclusion of such a provision.
Some support was expressed for the inclusion of such a provision on the ground that the payment of a deposit would deter parties from making frivolous requests for review.
Concerning expulsion in connection with extradition, dealt with in revised draft article 8 as reproduced in footnote 540 of the Commission's report(A/66/10),conflicting views had been expressed with respect to the inclusion of such a provision and its potential import.
It was stated that the inclusion of such a provision in draft article 12 might raise questions as to the need to include a similar provision in draft articles 11 and 14.
While several delegations expressed support for the article as contained in document E/CN.6/1997/WG/L.1,other delegations considered that the inclusion of such a provision in the optional protocol would represent a major step which needed careful consideration.
The Commission agreed that the inclusion of such a provision would be useful and desirable because it would promote a more uniform understanding of the Arbitration Model Law.
Noting the comments of the Committee resource person with regard to the constructive role of the Committee,some delegations welcomed the inclusion of such a provision as a modern means of dispute resolution and as encouraging a friendly settlement between the parties.
The mere inclusion of such a provision in a legal instrument diminished the status of custom as a source of law, since it clearly indicated which practice was considered desirable by the international community.
It was said that inclusion of such a provision might jeopardize the chances of it being implemented, or indeed jeopardize the overall acceptability of the Model Law, particularly in those countries that did not recognize anti-suit injunctions.
Nor must the principle of universal jurisdiction be confused with that of aut dedere aut judicare,which did not in itself establish universal jurisdiction for a treaty-based offence any more than the inclusion of such a provision in domestic extradition legislation or bilateral extradition treaties would do.
While there had been agreement in the Commission on the inclusion of such a provision, a variety of suggestions had been made as to its structure and formulation, as well as that of its title.
In other words, the inclusion of such a provision could have jeopardized the draft articles, because an international organization could be tempted to invoke its specific characteristics in order to avoid the consequences of its wrongful conduct altogether.
On the one hand, it was said that there was no worldwide consensus with respect to the standards andpractices concerning the granting of ex parte interim measures by arbitral tribunals and that inclusion of such a provision in the absence of such consensus could undermine the role of the Model Law as an international standard reflecting worldwide consensus.
They pointed out that the inclusion of such a provision in the optional protocol would be a contribution by the Working Group to the progressive development of international law with regard to the right to reparation for human rights violations.
Concerns were also expressed that the inclusion of such a provision was contrary to the principle of equal access of the parties to the arbitral tribunal and could expose the revised text of the Arbitration Model Law to criticism.
Other Governments oppose the inclusion of such a provision, mainly on the ground that the obligation to negotiate prior to the taking of countermeasures is not part of customary international law, unlike the prior demand for cessation and reparation.
While France was not in principle opposed to the inclusion of such a provision in the convention itself, as a State which was satisfied with the existing regime applicable to the watercourses which it shared with other States, it sought assurances, before the convention was elaborated, that those arrangements would remain unaffected.