Примеры использования Information before it на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee notes that, according to the information before it, there have been no complaints concerning torture.
Regarding the financial implications of the possible establishment of an Arbitration Board and a Disciplinary Board,the European Union would like further information before it could reach an informed decision on the matter.
The Committee concludes that the information before it does not justify the finding of a violation of articles 7 and 10 of the Covenant.
At its meeting on 8 July 1999, since it had reinstated the control proceedings, the Presidium availed itself of its legal discretion to determine the application itself, on the basis of the information before it.
The Committee considers that the information before it is not sufficient to establish a violation of article 7 in the author's case.
By letter of 30 September 2003, counsel for the complainant was requested to comment forthwith andadvised that failure to do so would result in the Committee's consideration of the case on the basis of the information before it.
On the basis of the information before it, the Committee found that the author's deportation would not entail a violation of article 6.
The Public Key Infrastructure implemented by Statistics Canada uses certificates that are installed on the respondent's workstation for the duration of a web session to encrypt the information before it is transmitted across an electronic network using an SSL session.
On the basis of the information before it, the Committee concludes that there has been no violation of article 14, subparagraph 3 a.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,is of the view that the information before it discloses a violation by the State party of article 14, paragraph 3(c), of the Covenant.
The Committee notes that the information before it does not show that the author has raised these particular allegations before the national courts.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,is of the view that the information before it discloses a violation by the State party of article 22, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
He agreed that the Committee needed more information before it could decide whether it should institute an urgent action procedure.
On the basis of the information before it, the Advisory Committee recommends that the Assembly approve the Secretary-General's estimate of $32,160,000 gross($31,188,000 net) for the period from 1 December 1993 to 30 November 1994.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,is of the view that the information before it discloses a violation by the State party of articles 9 and 14, paragraphs 1, 2 and 3(c), of the Covenant.
The Committee concludes that the information before it does not show that the author has been a victim of lack of independence of the Tribunal in this respect.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,is of the view that the information before it discloses a violation by the State party of the authors' rights under article 19, paragraph 2, of the Covenant.
The Committee notes that the information before it is unclear as to whether the High-Level Committee for Emigration has actually been established and what it has achieved so far.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,is of the view that the information before it reveals a violation of article 7, article 17 and article 2, paragraph 3, in relation to articles 3, 7 and 17 of the Covenant.
In this connection the Committee notes that the information before it does not disclose that the author requested and the Court actually denied him adequate time for the preparation of his defence.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,is of the view that the information before it discloses violations by the State party of the author's rights under article 14, paragraph 1, and article 19, paragraph 2, of the Covenant.
Having examined all the information before it and without prejudging the arbitrary nature of the detention, the Working Group decides to file the case of Mr. Zouari, in accordance with paragraph 17(a) of its methods of work.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,is of the view that the information before it disclose violations by the State party of article 14, paragraph 1, read in conjunction with article 14, paragraph 3(f) and article 10, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
Based on the information before it, the Working Group concludes that the case of Mr. Truong Minh Duc is a particularly grave case of arbitrary detention in terms of Category II of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases by the Working Group.
Nevertheless, the Committee considered that the information before it was not sufficient to enable it to adopt its Views at that stage.
The Committee found that the information before it disclosed a violation of articles 1, 2, paragraph 1, read in conjunction with article 1, article 11 and article 12, read alone and in conjunction with articles 6 and 7, as well as articles 13, 14 and 15 of the Convention.
With respect to the author's complaint under article 14,the Committee notes, from the information before it, that on 7 August 2006- almost 22 months after his second arrest- Abdussalam Il Khwildy was sentenced to two years' imprisonment by a special tribunal.
After having examined the information before it, the Committee concluded that the removal did restrict the complainant's freedom of expression, but that this restriction was provided for by the law, as found by the Supreme Court of Canada in the case.
In its Views on communicationNo. 100/1997(J.U.A. v. Switzerland), the Committee concluded that the information before it did not show substantial grounds for believing that the author run a personal risk of being tortured if returned to Nigeria and, therefore, no breach of article 3 of the Convention was found.
Having analysed all information before it, the Working Group finds that Mr. Jin and Mr. Zhang have been detained solely for creating an organization, organizing meetings and posting articles on the Internet on behalf of the organization called"New Youth Study Association.