Примеры использования International code of conduct for private security service providers на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.
Examples were the Montreux Document and the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.
The International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers' Association was established on 20 September 2013 at the first meeting of its General Assembly, held in Geneva, and serves as the governance and oversight mechanism for the Code. .
Comments on the draft Charter of the Oversight Mechanism for the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.
IMO acknowledges the value of the Montreux Document and the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers, but notes that they are not directly relevant to the situation of piracy and armed robbery in the maritime domain and do not provide sufficient guidance for private military and security companies ibid., para. 2.1.
In a parallel development, on 9 November 2010, 58 private security companies signed on to the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.
This mechanism-- the Charter for the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers-- was adopted in February 2013.
On 30 March 2012, the Working Group submitted comments on the draft Charter of the Oversight Mechanism for the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.
On 16 January 2012, the Temporary Steering Committee of the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers issued the draft Charter of the Oversight Mechanism for the Code for public consultation.
Companies employing private security forces should consider abiding by initiatives such as the Voluntary Principles on Security andHuman Rights and the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.
Those included the growing support for the Montreux Document and the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers(ICoC), as well as the launch of an oversight mechanism of the Code to certify companies and receive complaints about violations.
Private security companies must also guarantee under the contracts that they are aware of and in compliance with international and local laws, as well as the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers 2010.
I am pleased to inform you that, on 9 November 2010,some 60 private security companies signed an"international code of conduct for private security service providers"(see annex), in which they undertook to respect human rights and humanitarian law in their activities.
The Working Group welcomes efforts to clarify obligations under international law andidentify good practices, such as the Montreux Document, and industry selfregulation initiatives, such as the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.
Building on these foundations,the Signatory Companies to this International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers(the"Code") endorse the principles of the Montreux Document and the aforementioned"Respect, Protect, Remedy" framework as they apply to PSCs.
While the United Kingdom did not use private companies for military operations,as a leading State buyer of private security services, it promoted compliance with the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.
On 16 January 2012, the Temporary Steering Committee of the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers, a multi-stakeholder initiative supported by the Government of Switzerland, issued the Draft Charter of the Oversight Mechanism for the Code for public consultation.
The Working Group welcomes efforts to clarify obligations under international law and identify good practices, such as the Montreux Document,in addition to industry self-regulation initiatives, such as the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.
On 16 January 2012, the Temporary Steering Committee of the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers, a multi-stakeholder initiative supported by the Government of Switzerland, issued the Draft Charter of the Oversight Mechanism for the Code for public consultation.
The Working Group welcomes efforts to clarify obligations under international law and identify good practices,such as those contained in the Montreux Document, and industry self-regulation initiatives, such as the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.
On 21 September 2012,Mr. Rona participated in a civil society meeting on the draft charter of the oversight mechanism for the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers in Washington, D.C., organized by Amnesty International and the Rockefeller Foundation.
The United States intends to continue to convene Governments, civil society and business stakeholders to seek joint solutions on business and human rights and continue to serve as participants in key multi-stakeholder initiatives, such as the Voluntary Principles on Security andHuman Rights and the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.
At the industry level, the process for developing mechanisms for implementing the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers is under way.
Ensure that they, as well as security companies and other subcontractors, respect human rights defenders and do not harass or perpetrate violence against them and that those employing private security forces consider joining initiatives such as the Voluntary Principles on Security andHuman Rights and the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers;
The Working Group supported efforts such as the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers but was most concerned with developing a transparent grievance mechanism and rigorous audit procedures and with a human rights assessment of the type proposed by the former Special representative of the Secretary-General on business and human rights.
In that regard, the Montreux Document on Pertinent International Legal Obligations and Good Practices for States related to Operations of Private Military andSecurity Companies during Armed Conflict and the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers could help set standards.
Many delegations recalled the need for a legally binding document by pointing to the weaknesses of national legislation, the Montreux Document on private military andsecurity companies, and the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers, more particularly related to criminal accountability and remedies for victims.
Building on the foundations of the Montreux Document, which clarified the responsibilities of States in relation to the use of private military and security companies in armed conflict,the private military and security industry, with the support of the Government of Switzerland, developed the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers in November 2010.
Others have worked through collaborative efforts, including multi-stakeholder initiatives, at the national or the international level, such as the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative.
The Working Group welcomes efforts to clarify obligations under international law and identify good practices, such as the Montreux Document on pertinent international legal obligations and good practices for States related to operations of private military and security companies during armed conflict, andindustry self-regulation initiatives such as the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.