Примеры использования Inventive step на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
And[the patent] was considered not to involve an inventive step”.
How is the inventive step of applications for inventions evaluated?
Generally, checking an invention for an inventive step is not an easy task.
Grounds for the claims were non-compliance of the patent with novelty and inventive step.
A useful model with an inventive step that will meet patent protection requirements.
However, TK as such cannot be patented,since it does not satisfy the novelty and/or inventive step criteria.
Patents protect inventions that are new,involve an inventive step and are capable of industrial application.
As the inventive step is often minimal and originality is the only requirement, the minimum period of protection under TRIPS is 10 years.
The substantive requirements under EPC are:(i)novelty; inventive step; and(ii) industrial application.
The invention must show an“inventive step” that could not be deduced by a person with average knowledge of the technical field.
In order to gain protection,an invention must possess novelty, an inventive step and is susceptible to industrial application.
Technological developments of Mintek-Technologiya JSCtypically include know-how elements, and most of the equipment and tools samples are executed at an inventive step.
Patent is granted only in casewhen technical solution has novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability or utility.
Apply strict standards of novelty, inventive step and industrial application or utility(consider higher standards than currently applied in developed countries).
In order to be patentable, the invention must fulfill certain conditions novelty, inventive step, industrial application.
The inventive test requires the invention to exhibit an inventive step that could not be deduced by a person with average knowledge of the technical field.
The purpose of the information search is to discover prior art used to determine the compliance of the claimed invention to conditions of patentability- novelty and inventive step.
Other issues that could also be more openly addressed would include the possible interpretations of novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability(see chapter 6) and the disclosure of the origin of biological material(chapter 4).
During the examination it should be checked that the intellectual property object meets the following requirements defined by the legislation:industrial applicability or utility, inventive step and novelty.
This revolves around the nature of the inventive step required for patenting, the nature of the claims for the invented use of that material, and the extent to which those claims might limit use of the underlying genetic material.
May the new year inspire people to invent more devices, truly novel,industrially applicable and having inventive step, and more methods to make the world happier.
Invention does not contain an inventive step if it was obtained as a result of addition, substitution, exclusion, multiplication and other similar trivial operations with known elements and parameters in a product or a process by known methods and rules, and if the result of such operations is obvious for a person skilled in the art.
In general, as with a patent, to be protected by a utility model, an invention must be new,involve an inventive step, and lend itself to industrial application.
In 1999 the EPO determined that according to the evidence“all features of the present claim have been disclosed to the public prior to the patent application… and[the patent]was considered not to involve an inventive step”.
Information search ends when analyzed all sources of information ordocuments are found to demonstrate lack of novelty and inventive step in respect of not only the entire facility as a whole, but also all of its distinctive features.
In which case seeking an exclusion from patent protection may best be achieved by a strict application of the criteria for patentability. These include, as we have discussed above, clearly defining what constitutes a patentable invention as opposed to an unpatentable discovery, andensuring that the concepts of novelty, inventive step and industrial utility are properly applied.
Verification of the compliance of the claimed invention with the patentability criteria relating to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability shall be carried out on the filing date of the Eurasian application and, where priority is claimed, on the priority date.
The criteria for awarding a PVP certificate involve lower thresholds than the standards required for patents. There are requirements for novelty and distinctness, butthere is no equivalent of non-obviousness(inventive step) or utility(industrial applicability).
Subject to the provisions of paragraph(3), in relation to each claim,whether the claim appears to satisfy the criteria of novelty, inventive step(non-obviousness), and industrial applicability, as defined for the purposes of the international preliminary examination in Article 33(1) to 4.
In June 2016, SIPO issued its preliminary and non-binding report, which concluded that the claimed invention was probably not patentable, as the technology covered by the patent application was more than 40 years old andappeared to lack an inventive step, one of the main requirements for patentability.